I'm afraid I'm not following your reasoning. My question still stands - who in this environment will spend $4,500 on a cd player without a couple of digital inputs? This is not 2007.
I believe McIntosh has spelled it out in their announcement. This is a CD/SACD player only. You will find digital inputs on the preamplifiers. Most total Mac system owners won't blink an eye at this.I'm afraid I'm not following your reasoning. My question still stands - who in this environment will spend $4,500 on a cd player without a couple of digital inputs? This is not 2007.
Not likely, as that means fewer models to sell which translates to fewer overall sales. The broader the line, the greater the chance of having something for every customer. This also provides for lower product development and material costs across the board as certain features and architecture can be shared and amortized among units. Finally, smart manufacturers want to keep their manufacturing facilities running as often as possible, up to 24/7, as this allows them to maximize their investment in the facility and real estate as well as their contribution to the community from which they operate.It wouldn't surprise me if Mc starts slimming down their product line up in the next couple quarters. With only maybe only one CD/SACD player, and one transport, they're already dropped the MR88, and are only offering the MR87.
Mac knows people want analog tone controls, now if we could get our variable loudness back...
I agree that Mac knows at least a minority want tone controls, myself included, analogue or otherwise, but do they really believe we want a range of +/- 12db? I mean Please, give us no more than +/- 6db.
Bringing back the variable loudness would be nice too, but less needed with the 5 band EQ.
Mortis:
Your comment on the "range of +/- 12db?" Gave me a chuckle. As it was timely. I was at a dealer event and in one of the demo rooms one of the attendees was a bit animated because the preamp did not have tone controls. And he was pacing in the room and pointing at the preamp and repeating, "how could it not have at least tone controls." And the person he was with struck up a conversation with me and we ended up talking about Triode Corporation product. This person had one of their amps and I had just had on loan one of their preamps. And so I asked this person whether he had tried their preamps since he very much liked the amp that he had. And the animated person, that was his friend/family member, etc., overheard me and mentioned that the Triode preamp was no good because while it had eq, the eq was only +/- 6 db. And a person needed a preamp with AT LEAST +/- 12 db, just like "a McIntosh preamp!!!" So, I guess different strokes...
The D150 and MA8900 use the same DAC so i am not sure you should get the MA8900 unless you prefer only 1 device instead of 2.I am wondering how the MA8900 DAC compares to the D150. Depending, I may part with my MA7900 + D150 in favor of the MA8900 by itself.
The D150 and MA8900 use the same DAC so i am not sure you should get the MA8900 unless you prefer only 1 device instead of 2.
What i am very curious is if you can tell me the performance of D150 compared to the MA7900 built in DAC. I have the MA6700 and i wonder if the D150 is a big improvement.