The problem with the guy that makes the new boards is that he doesn't sell to the public. You have to send your amps to him for repair. And I believe it's only the 565's that he make's boards for. I have been talking to him for a couple of days now and seems like he knows his stuff. I will find out. Chris Hoppe's is his name Out of Madison Wi. Hoppe's Brain.com
Actually, I'm happy to sell the boards to DIY'ers for $35/ea! I can't fix them all myself! I was being low-key about selling them—a little worried about copyright, being that they are straight-up copies of the artwork from the original boards. But after talking to a lawyer friend, he doesn't think there's anything to worry about. The current holders of the Adcom brand name would have no right to prevent me making after-market parts for old products. And they are distinct products from the originals, in that they are nicer quality, with the plated through-holes and newer fabrication technology.
I have already sold a handful of boards, and three of those people have reported back with success! It is a rather huge undertaking, more than one might expect. (Thus the fairly high price for my service on this.) But I provide a parts list so you can order a complete set of Dale and TE 0.1% resistors and the like, along with part numbers for known equivalents for all the semiconductors, if you should have blown components. There are also some parts upgrade suggestions, like good MKP caps and non-inductive resistors on the zobel, and better electrolytic caps to use. (Panasonic FC, ED and Nichi FG.)
I don't know where this rumor about Adcom having used paper or phenolic boards comes from. Every Adcom amp I've seen has used a decent quality FR4 fiberglass board, even the very early rack-mount version of the GFA-555. There were some earlier models than that, but I haven't seen them, but I did fix a GFA-1A that was fiberglass. (Neat amp.)
It's not paper, but the electrolyte does soak into the fiberglass. No surprise, fiberglass is basically BPA plastic; easy to dissolve, and eager to absorb chemicals. The electrolyte continues to seep out, even after it's been cleaned perfectly off the surface. I've seen 565's come to me that were once repaired, but went DC again. There was corrosion on the new solder joints.
I don't want to worry that a customer's amp is going to go DC, thus, the new boards. Some people have crazy expensive and irreplaceable speakers.
I have restored a GFA-585 with a pair of these 565 boards! There are some minor mods to the circuitry, but it can be made 100% identical. There are two boards in the 585, and they're mounted vertically instead of horizontally in the 565. There are some minor physical modifications, but it comes out neatly. It becomes a slightly harder to work on because the board layout isn't optimal sideways, but these amps are very reliable once properly fixed.
I don't have a board for the GFA-555 or 555II. They don't suffer from the same capacitor issue as the 565/585. I've seen a few very slightly leaky capacitors on 555's, but it's not due to a bad batch like the Elna's the 565/585 had. And failure modes not nearly as dramatic. The Elna's literally spray all over the inside of the amp. Adcom used many different types here, and none seem more prone to failure than the others.
In the 565, the bad caps just happen to be adjacent to highly sensitive areas like the DC servo. The slightest leakage causes issues.