And vinyl is?Because sometimes it is needed for context. We have a several file cabinets full of paper records and a database full of electronic records at work; not all records are musical recordings.
And vinyl is?Because sometimes it is needed for context. We have a several file cabinets full of paper records and a database full of electronic records at work; not all records are musical recordings.
We used to call them albums.That didn't matter when records were the main means of popular music storage, before CDs and such. The context was in the nature of the conversation.
"Let's listen to some records." "I bought the new Supremes record." "Do you want the record or the cassette?" (Though cassettes were usually simply called "tapes".) It worked fine.
We used to call them albums.
We called 45's records as well. If you're old enough, you remember "record hops".I bought many 45s. But I often called LPs "albums".
I find it odd that some who call records vinyl vehemently object to calling one record a vinyl since that use follows logically.
I've always thought that all these words people used to describe what they were hearing was due to the fact that they didn't understand frequency response and total harmonic distortion.
how do you know if its "minty"?
do you have to lick it? or is smelling it enough?
SCROE makes me want to puke.
likewise TUNA
Thanks for that. This one is the polar opposite of striving for higher fidelity. You might as well say that there are no standards, there is no goal. It's the audio enthusiast's equivalent to Special Olympics. "As long as it sounds good to you" is like "winning" a participation trophy.