I voted for Canon and Other.
I've been a Canon user since 1974 when I bought a Canon TLb. Finances kept me from really investing in FD-mount lenses and what I had was all stolen in 1982. When I got back into photography a few years later, I dived into the Canon EOS system with an EOS 630 then an EOS RT (pellicle mirror) and a handful of lenses. My interests waned until I bought an EOS 50D a few years ago that, sadly, only gets used a couple times a year.
I think Canon builds good stuff. The EF lens mount for the EOS line was innovative at the time and left the Nikon fans making excuses though Nikon is certainly on par with or better than Canon in some areas. Both companies have extensive systems of bodies, lenses, flashes, and accessories. All that said, I am very tempted to dump all my Canon equipment and go to Sony mirrorless. Conventional single lens reflex designs are starting to look like dinosaurs.
I've been a Canon user since 1974 when I bought a Canon TLb. Finances kept me from really investing in FD-mount lenses and what I had was all stolen in 1982. When I got back into photography a few years later, I dived into the Canon EOS system with an EOS 630 then an EOS RT (pellicle mirror) and a handful of lenses. My interests waned until I bought an EOS 50D a few years ago that, sadly, only gets used a couple times a year.
I think Canon builds good stuff. The EF lens mount for the EOS line was innovative at the time and left the Nikon fans making excuses though Nikon is certainly on par with or better than Canon in some areas. Both companies have extensive systems of bodies, lenses, flashes, and accessories. All that said, I am very tempted to dump all my Canon equipment and go to Sony mirrorless. Conventional single lens reflex designs are starting to look like dinosaurs.