24/96 vs 24/192

Discussion in 'Digital Sources' started by moejr, Nov 30, 2016.

  1. +48V

    +48V hi-fi or die

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Tega Cay
    Since this is the sole focus and subject of the op a.k.a. post #1…is it too much to ask that you & et alia elaborate on this specific point henceforth instead of relentlessly contributing further to the exorbitant amount of thread drift? Perhaps indeed....
     
  2. E-Stat

    E-Stat Super Member

    Messages:
    4,000
    Why didn't you make that observation from the very first response, i.e. post #2 which compared Redbook to 24/192?
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2016
  3. analoge4ever

    analoge4ever Active Member

    Messages:
    185
    Location:
    Lock Haven, PA
    When I record a live event @ 24 bit 96Khz PCMI, afterwards I can and do play the recording through my system. Now I'm still discovering things when I mix, but almost everything, even the order in which I do things, does make a difference. So if I get everything right my Redbook CDs are almost indistinguishable from the original PCMI recording, but it is really pretty difficult to avoid changing the sound.

    My point is that the same song at different resolutions probably will sound different, but not necessarily because of the resolution alone.
     
    Audioraven likes this.
  4. E-Stat

    E-Stat Super Member

    Messages:
    4,000
    Reading the results of the AES study to which I linked and brought to your attention multiple times.

    This study aims at investigating whether listeners can perceive differences between musical files recorded at 44.1kHz and 88.2kHz with the same analog chain and type of AD-converter. Sixteen expert listeners were asked to compare 3 versions (44.1kHz, 88.2kHz and the 88.2kHz version down-sampled to 44.1kHz) of 5 musical excerpts in a blind ABX task. Overall, participants were able to discriminate between files recorded at 88.2kHz and their 44.1kHz down-sampled version. Furthermore, for the orchestral excerpt, they were able to discriminate between files recorded at 88.2kHz and files recorded at 44.1kHz.

    And yet, thirteen of the sixteen participants have performed The Impossible". :)

    I didn't really believe you had an honest interest in actually learning anything - just droning on about your preconceptions and clicking the bold button.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2016
    Alobar, SoNic67 and Audioraven like this.
  5. +48V

    +48V hi-fi or die

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Tega Cay
    Ah…the notorious “answer a question with a question” dodge. Sorry, but I do not share your interest in further cluttering this thread with unproductive and frivolous debate tactics.

    [sigh] At least we now know that it was indeed asking too much from you to keep your focus on topic.
     
  6. +48V

    +48V hi-fi or die

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Tega Cay
    Maybe a larger font will help re-center things back on topic......
    :rolleyes:
     
  7. E-Stat

    E-Stat Super Member

    Messages:
    4,000
    You're 142 posts late.
     
    Alobar and SoNic67 like this.
  8. Alobar

    Alobar Pulling out of the Last Chance Texaco.. Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,887
    Location:
    SE Alaska
    Now you have broached another subject entirely. Stating that chasing after the best quality means that one doesn't enjoy music is where many will justify less SQ. It may or may not be so but it is not the subject of this thread. BTW, I suspect it isn't so much about perfect hearing, but better listening ability. If someone is texting on the phone, typing on a forum, getting bitched at by a wife (or husband) or any other of the multitude of distractions, then you are nowhere near critically "hearing" the music, even with perfect hearing!
     
  9. lini

    lini just me...

    Messages:
    5,309
    Location:
    Munich, Bavaria
    Yup, you probably should have - but to be honest, I might have forgotten to just as well...

    On that topic, what often appears pretty ironic to me is that many, if not most of the earlier CD players from the times, before CD burners became common or even before CD-Rs existed, have absolutely no problem to play these - and then the drives suddenly became more picky. Just contrary to what one would usually expect...

    Greetings from Munich!

    Manfred / lini
     
  10. RhythmGJ

    RhythmGJ Super Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    >>>>On that topic, what often appears pretty ironic to me is that many, if not most of the earlier CD players from the times, before CD burners became common or even before CD-Rs existed, have absolutely no problem to play these - and then the drives suddenly became more picky. Just contrary to what one would usually expect...<<<<

    Absolutely true! The best player I had (as far as accepting anything) was an original 1980s Sony Discman with am/fm/tv radio from Japan. Gave up the ghost a few years ago, but basically would play anything. Next would be a cheap $20 portable. Those were both before my current Numarks, which also play just about anything. But a fairly expensive Marantz I had (6-disc), a 100 disc player (forget the brand), and several computer drives were very, very finicky. It seems late 90's through mid-2000s were when the machines became "too smart for their own good."

    GJ
     
    moejr likes this.
  11. moejr

    moejr Super Member

    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Londonderry NH
    I just experienced that today. My 1989 Kenwood CD Player will play burned CD not a problem though if more than 12 songs it starts to have problems reading so you just keep the burns 12 songs or less. But as I said previously the 1999 Kenwood DVD/CD player cannot play CDR's. That's just plain messed up.
     
  12. JustinCase

    JustinCase AK Subscriber Subscriber

    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    I've read it somewhere on here that the 1st generation Sony Playstation was / is a very dependable player for pretty much anything. Apparently they designed it so that it could read disks that us kids abused and used as frisbees. The Playstation will play just about any cd you throw into it afaik.
     
    moejr likes this.
  13. SoNic67

    SoNic67 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    920
    That's an urban legend. The DAC in that PS1 is a horrendous first generation delta-sigma, quickly replaced by manufacturers because of the issues they discovered.
    The grease on the rails is dry and it cannot go past a certain point (starts from the interior towards out).
     
    tmtomh and moejr like this.
  14. moejr

    moejr Super Member

    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Londonderry NH
    I'll
    I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the tip.
     
  15. Tom Bombadil

    Tom Bombadil AK Member Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    Madison, Wisconsin
    This is true. I own two of them, picked up for $5 each. They are the least accurate CD players I've ever heard. My standard demo CD cuts sound very different as compared to how they sound on good quality CD players & DACs. That said, I can understand why some people like them. They roll off highs more than any player I've ever heard. And the bass is warmer and less defined. Sounded something like if you had a DSP mode for Way Over The Top Tube sound.
     
    tmtomh and SoNic67 like this.
  16. SoNic67

    SoNic67 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    920
    ^ That might be true.
     
  17. +48V

    +48V hi-fi or die

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Tega Cay
    Bumping the OP in one last chivalrous attempt to poll the AK community in this thread with their own personal experience. It's a simple question.

    Please, no more third party links to opposing he said/she said studies, videos, Redbook straw man derailments, etc. There's plenty of that behind us.

    If you have in fact compared 24/96 tracks to 24/192 tracks, tell us if YOU personally have experienced a difference. Is it possible we can now get some simple answers?

    :)
     
  18. RhythmGJ

    RhythmGJ Super Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    No, none. (Difference that is; to these ears)...

    GJ
     
    tmtomh likes this.
  19. Andyman

    Andyman Scroungus Stereophilus Subscriber

    Some folks hear a difference, others don't, so only you can determine if it matters to you. I played a few hi-rez tracks in my modest system and certainly don't notice any huge difference, if any at all. But others may.

    That being said, I built my system for my enjoyment, not others. So find your sweet spot and enjoy the hell out of it, others be damned...
     
  20. +48V

    +48V hi-fi or die

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Tega Cay
    Oh, I almost forgot. :oops:

    Put a check in the No column for me.
     

Share This Page