I posted the initial question trying to understand the differences in design (and sound) between my old Krell FPB300 (with me for more than five years) and my new mc602.
To me the 602 sounds much better than the FPB300. Being the 300 a class A amp which according to Krell doubles its power every time the impedance halves, according to strictly common knowledge it SHOULD sound batter than the Mc...But to me the Mc sounds much BETTER. After reading all the responses and mainly Ron-c's it seems, in the end, that class is just a factor to take into consideration. Perhaps a Mcintosh AB or B class amplifier sounds better than a Krell class A amp, but the Krell sounds better than, say a Parasound...The answer is in the ear of the beholder.
To me the 602 sounds much better than the FPB300. Being the 300 a class A amp which according to Krell doubles its power every time the impedance halves, according to strictly common knowledge it SHOULD sound batter than the Mc...But to me the Mc sounds much BETTER. After reading all the responses and mainly Ron-c's it seems, in the end, that class is just a factor to take into consideration. Perhaps a Mcintosh AB or B class amplifier sounds better than a Krell class A amp, but the Krell sounds better than, say a Parasound...The answer is in the ear of the beholder.