pic of my setup, can't wait to restore the AR's so it will be a fair fight with the fully restored DQ-10's..
No "fair fight" unless you play old vinyl. No matter what amp you use (and I don't care if it's 10,000 wpc) you cannot do better than the attached frequency response curve published by AR with both controls full ON.
The only way to overcome this with the original drivers is to:
1. Bi-amp
2. Cut back on the mid driver to bring it in line with the tweeter (now, this puts the mid way, way behind the woofer and makes a base heavy speaker even more bass heavy)
3. Apply more power to the mid/tweeter amp to bring everything back into balance
Now, I bi-amp my 3a's with just the original three terminals. The better way to do this however is to bring out two new terminals. There is no sonic improvement over what I'm doing, but you gain a lot of flexibility. For example with 4 independent terminals you can easily use a tube amp on the mids/tweeters.
Hope this helps...
Regards,
Jerry
The reason I say "fair fight" is that it's hard to compare when the mids and or highs cut out on AR's when bass hits due to pitted pots and nearly 50 year old caps.
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say.
Can't do better than ARs or can't do better with ARs?
Look, those AR's were designed in an era when vinyl was the main source for sound reproduction. During the late 50's and early 60's record companies enhanced high frequencies on their records to compensate for the poor play back systems (record players with ceramic cartridges) prevalent in the marketplace.
AR designed their speakers to work perfectly with those records. Just look at the response curve from AR which I posted. Fast forward to modern digital playback without that high frequency enhancement and AR speakers sound dull and lifeless. That was what I meant by the shootout isn't really fair.
You can "fix" the problem, but only with two amps. Some say EQ's can help, but EQ's by nature introduce additional problems and distortions.
VINTAGEO, does this make sense now?
Regards,
Jerry
Thanks for the clarification onplane, I was just unclear as to what you were trying to say.
I would rather listen to my vintage AR's than most newer speakers produced today. I guess it's just the feeling I get when listening to them. Like us they aren't PERFECT and I think that'stt the most satisfying part, they don't have to be. As long as we enjoy our music, that's what counts.
Don't judge speakers by their performance numbers, but by the way they actually make you FEEL..
Wooow! What's the value of those oil cans?New film caps have arrived, and new pots grills cloth and badges on their way at xmas!! Gonna be some new old speakers in the house soon!! The caps are HUGE!!!View attachment 1065426
At 60 wpc, it will be ok. Your JVC 1010 will be much better driving the AR's. They like power.So I have a question, I picked up a BEAUTIFUL Sansui model Eight last night and was wondering if it would pair well with the AR's ? I hear they are quite the receiver.. This one has an issue though, bad left channel, I will try to sort that out before I get the AR's all redone.
Nice. You've got two monsters of collectibility and I'm jealous. Depending on who you ask the Model 8 may or may not be more desirable than the fabled 9090.
At 60 wpc, it will be ok. Your JVC 1010 will be much better driving the AR's. They like power.