Cartridge Advice

I use following cartridges, all on the same Marantz headshell for relative ease of swapping:

Ortofon 2M Bronze (~30 hours)
Nagaoka MP-110 (~10 hours)
Sumiko Pearl (~40 hours)
Piezo YM-308II (hours unknown)

I've got one more headshell that needs a cartridge to both create a set of 4 complete setups for a display holder I have and, more importantly, to ideally provide a different listening experience.

I am beyond thrilled with the Bronze -- it's been my primary cart this year, and appreciate the MP-110 and Pearl for their neutrality. I bought the Piezo because I regretted selling an Acutex cartridge I once had, and dig it's sound, as well.

I run the 6300 straight through a 2275 and listen primarily to classic rock, alternative rock, and jazz vinyl.

I'm not experienced enough to analyze the spec particulars of the cartridges I own, but I think they are all fairly similar in output (~5 mV).

Would really appreciate recommendations that you believe would produce a different (not necessarily better) listening experience. At this time, I need cap cost at $100-$150. I bought the Piezo well below that and hold it in similar regard as the Nagaoka and Sumiko.

 

@cloneofkane , are you using the original solid aluminum head-shell that came with the Marantz 6300?

 

I'd say the Shure M97xE would be your best bet
https://www.lpgear.com/product/SHEC03.html

But if you want to get into a really different sound, AudioTechnica cartridges are usually VERY detailed. Some love 'em; some think they are too bright. I switch between a Shure V15 and an AT14Sa on a Linn Basik.
https://www.lpgear.com/product/ATC06b.html

Good listening.

 

What about trying a Grado?

 

Yes -- they are all original solid aluminum headshells used with the 6100/6200/6300 turntables.

 

Shure M35x

That cart is just fun. And it is very forgiving. Also won't set you back much.

 

Shure M97xE was a consideration before trying the Sumiko and Nagaoka, so I know it fits the budget and is a well-regarded cartridge for the money. Am I right in remembering that it is a more laid back, subdued sound?

Grados are moving iron, right? I can do a search comparing Grados to the Shure M97xE and my carts, but is there a particular Grado you had in mind? New models vs. old?

 

Yes, the M97Xe is very laid back in my opinion, to the point of being dull. I sold the one I tried.

Another house sound I am not fond of. Also laid back to the point that I sold the Grados that I tried. Many are fans of the Grado sound. It just doesn't do it for me.

 

"Fun" sounds interesting, man! Quick Google search shows it to be a DJ cart... that would definitely be different. Would like to hear more about makes the M35x more fun than other cartridges you've listened to.

 

I missed the Audio Technica comment earlier. The first cart I had was the at95e, which I thought sounded great for the cost. Bright and detailed are characteristics I heard about the Ortofon 2M line -- are AT's and Ortofon 2M's on par or is one considered more bright/detailed than the other?

 

Those solid aluminum head-shells add considerable mass to the tone-arm, so in my opinion, a cartridge with a medium compliance stylus would be preferable. The exception would be the Shure M97xE. The stabilizing brush allows it to be used in medium mass tone-arms.

 

Too bad you can't stretch your budget a little and give a HOMC cart, like the Denon DL-110 a try.

If you want fun, want to try something from Shure, but are worried the M97xE would be too laid back, what about one of the vintage Shure cartridges of the M75, M91 or M95 variety. These are plentiful and affordable and there are a lot of good aftermarket stylii (as well as a few NOS genuine Shure stylii still floating around out there) to give you some good options and still keep the total cost well within your budget.

 

Actually not different at all. The M35X is very smooth sounding, unlike the high output M44-7 which is loud and has solid bass response but at the same time kind of harsh.

 

The M97xE is a somewhat neutral sounding cartridge. When I first bought mine, I thought it was on the dull side, but the more I listened to it, I came to realize that it is very smooth and enjoyable.

 

I appreciate the thoughts and welcome more/others. I know I could do a lot more to understand better the science and specifications side of the relationship between the tone arm/headshell and cartridge, among other things. The tech that serviced my 6300 told me the Bronze was a perfect match for the 6300, its tone arm and headshell. It does sound amazing, but I just took his word for it.

 

Some Marantz headshell are pretty heavy, which one are you using?

 

Shure SC35C on order, and I going to try that Audio-Technica AT3600 too I will need another headshell, though.

 

You are going to like the SC35C cartridge. When you are ready for a new stylus for it, the JICO SS35C stylus will be a step up from the stock stylus.

The current Made in Mexico SS35C stylus has a .7 mil conical tip. The original Made In USA tip was .6 mil conical, same with the JICO. You'll find the JICO SS35C to reproduced the higher frequencies better.

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product...cts_id=1040&osCsid=ltv4fdb601voo3uaji08egcoa7

 

Received and set the Shure SC35C up yesterday, and have been listening to some titles that I thought would be interesting based on the comments quoted above: Black Keys Magic Potion, The Stooges Fun House, and Black Sabbath Paranoid. Fun listening indeed, almost to the point of distraction! Bass and kick drum just hammer away even at 8 o'clock. Guitar solos muddied compared to other carts that separate more cleanly, but no complaints at all. It is definitely the "different" sound I was looking for, and a bargain at $59.

I have 2 manual tracking force gauges, neither of which is capable of setting 4-5 grams recommended for this cartridge. After balancing tone arm to 0, I just kept turning the counter weight to 1, 2, 3, and 0 (4), and have been spinning at that setting. Thought occurred to me: should I be worried at all about a tracking force of ~4 grams damaging vinyl?