Denon 103, 103R, 301......Which one would you get?

Compared to a AT33ptg/II the 103R definitely sounds a bit muffled in the upper frequency range. (i'm using raal ribbon tweeters, so its easy to hear the difference)
It's a very musical and smooth cart though, so i like it anyway.
 
Last edited:
I've tried many cartridges in my system including Ortofon VMS20E, 2MRed, Shure M91ED, Grado F3E+, Denon DL-110 but the one that delivered the best performance was the plain vanilla DL-103. It might or might not work for you. Synergy is the key.
 
....
I will say that it really likes a lot of arm mass. I have a Jelco SA-750D (eff. mass: 20g w/headshell), and adding some additional weight to the counterweight (a large washer affixed with BlueStik) and to the headshell (3g insert plate) REALLY made things pop. Bass got phatter and tighter, dynamics became more impactful, and the imaging really expanded. ....

Just for your information:effective_mass_jelco_tonearms_WM.jpg
 
Here's a 24/96 needledrop FLAC I did not too long ago using my DL-103 on the TD-124/Jelco, using a Shure SUT and Rega Brio-R.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ck5v7q70j9buqa4/11.You Set The Scene.flac?dl=0

The record is "You Set the Scene" by Love, from the MOFI 2x45 of "Forever Changes."

UDSACD2131-2.jpg
 
Where did the post go with links to 103 vs 103R recordings?

Please post those again. I was looking forward to hearing them.
 
Probably a PM would be better. People can understandably be worried about piracy despite just having samples for comparison
 
If the arm is suitable, the 301/II is the better choice. As you move up the line, all the upper end Denons are higher compliance ellipticals with metal bodies.
 
As you move up the line, all the upper end Denons are higher compliance ellipticals

You can occasionally come across the Denon 103S type which was elliptical "like" think they called it special contour or something
like that.
 
You can occasionally come across the Denon 103S type which was elliptical "like" think they called it special contour or something
like that.
Don't forget the 103D and M, among others. It seems everytime Denon sought to improve the 103 line, the went with higher compliance and elliptical, and sometimes metal bodies*. Maybe these were the testing grounds for their other lines.

*edit: after reading through Collin1141's link I guess not. Still, it was and still is a fairly common upgrade.
 
Last edited:
I'll soon be running a DL301mk2 along with my current favorite which is the DL103. I had read mixed opinions about the DL103 on the Technics 1200 but it seemed like an affordable entry to MC carts and I'm really glad I got it.

Made me curious about the next step up with the 301mk2!
 
I'll soon be running a DL301mk2 along with my current favorite which is the DL103. I had read mixed opinions about the DL103 on the Technics 1200 but it seemed like an affordable entry to MC carts and I'm really glad I got it.

Made me curious about the next step up with the 301mk2!
They're two different animals
 
It would be great if the 301 will give an event better performance but maintain the musicality of the 103 which I've really grown to enjoy.
 
Besides compliance, the most important difference is output followed by stylus type
Proper loading will differ in order to realize the full potential of any of them
Depending on whether you use a transformer, a head amp or if your phono amp provides the gain needed, that will be the ultimate deciding factor as for the most overlooked aspect of all of this as far as rewards go
Noise floor
And that will determine the overall arc of performance to a LARGE degree, i.e. - inner detail without the veil and good transient response
You can't have it all without being able to control or adjust the variables, not just the cartridge itself
The higher the cart's output, the greater the chances are for raising the noise floor
It all depends on your hardware (how much flexibility or what you have) AFTER the cart
 
My Luxman SUT is made for the 103, so 103 it is. I would not classify it as dull at all.
SUTs can be ideal if you feed them into a good quiet phono line stage
The only drawback is that all SUTs won't work optimally with all low output transducers (low output moving coils) giving rise to the possibility that you may need more than one if you have more than one moving coil (with different output voltages) in order to realize the different cartridges' full potential
Obviously they should be matched as best possible

If you've found a good match that makes you happy then stick with it
No need to fool with a good thing

I gave up on SUTs when OP amp based phono stages made gain and loading changes possible with well designed all in one units - simplicity and flexibility - and they are QUIET
This being one instance where I have come to appreciate good ICs from folks like Analog Devices and Texas Instruments (Burr-Brown) rather than a combination of passive married to discrete archetecture
Took a while for the "new technology" to catch up with the old
 
Back
Top Bottom