Frank Sol
Lunatic Member
Have you personally heard a stock 1240 with your MM carts?
nope
How did I know you haven't :nono: You seem to have to be negative about any TT in the PLX1000 range without having any 1st hand experience
Very odd
Have you personally heard a stock 1240 with your MM carts?
nope
you obviously haven't read my comments very well.How did I know you haven't :nono: You seem to have to be negative about any TT in the PLX1000 range without having any 1st hand experience
Except one opinion is based on first hand experience, the other on reading reviews.you obviously haven't read my comments very well.
In any case, Frank, this is getting very tedious and not contributing much to anyone reading this thread who might be trying to decide if the PLX-1000 is worth checking out. You have your opinion; I have mine. It's obvious never the twain shall meet, so let's give it a rest.
Because no one else here has bought one (as far as I know), and I think I need one more TT (this will be #9), I have decided to buy this much anticipated DD table. I have already drawn lines in the sand for this table, and if it doesn't perform to my utmost expectations, its going back.
I'm an engineering guy, not a reviewer, so keep that in mind.
I hope it turns out well.
In the second part of the review, I will install one of the cartridges (probably a Grado) to check for hum issues...
I don't have any prejudice towards this table. I stated from the first post that there is a firm line drawn in the sand, and if this table doesn't pass my expectations, it goes back.
Er, no. Other than the Reichart and Guttenberg reviews, all the others I read were actual users on this or other forums. Their first-hand experience is every bit as valid as Wayner's, plus they don't show the kind of inconsistencies his review and comments do (not only about the PLX, but also about the Technics).Except one opinion is based on first hand experience, the other on reading reviews.
I meant Frank Sol. You (Garven) have never seen the deck, so your opinion can only be secondhand.
Actually I have seen and touched a PLX-1000. I was in a Pro Music Shop a couple of months ago and saw one. I was in a hurry and didn't have time to audition it plus it wasn't hooked up to anything. I checked the bearings to see if they were loose (they weren't). Before buying one, I'd obviously want to audition it carefully using my own LPs, but until I'm ready to purchase, I've read lots of impressions online from people who actually own it. All but 2-3 are positive.I meant Frank Sol. You have never seen the deck, so your opinion can only be secondhand.
Actually I have seen and touched a PLX-1000. I was in a Pro Music Shop a couple of months ago and saw one. I was in a hurry and didn't have time to audition it plus it wasn't hooked up to anything. I checked the bearings to see if they were loose (they weren't). Before buying one, I'd obviously want to audition it carefully using my own LPs, but until I'm ready to purchase, I've read lots of impressions online from people who actually own it. All but 2-3 are positive.
Not in the forums where I hang out!Online impressions can be misleading. More than a few people own and enjoy Crosley or Ion turntables and post their positive impressions of those turntable-shaped objects.
Online impressions can be misleading. More than a few people own and enjoy Crosley or Ion turntables and post their positive impressions of those turntable-shaped objects. The Bose 901 also gets a lot of love in online forums.
I love both Crosley and Ion.
I read a review where a guy sold his tricked out Technics SP-10 Mk3 once he heard his new Ion
I wasn't aware it's been linked here before. It's my first time. Yup, he's an Aussie in Dubai. You got to appreciate him living in one of the hottest countries in the world requiring a special permit to drink a cool one and allowing it only in designated bars and hotels for foreigners. Maybe that explains the full 30 minutes dealing with the PLX-1000. That's too long.
I thought it was pretty clear what was going on inside, the minute he lifted the bottom. Excuse me for saying so, but what's inside doesn't strike me as a $700 worth of quality TT content. Frankly, it looks sorta flimsy and the pitch fader soldered on to the PCB is, IMHO plain stupid.
That Pixle guy has some very interesting observations, backed up by solid explanations and obviously technical experience, regarding the expected durability of that TT. I think he makes a strong argument.
I kinda agree about the dubious cleverness of the experiment he devised with the speaker behind the TT. I don't think it represents a real life scenario and I also think it wasn't really placed straight, yet, you got to admit the Technics dealt with it quite remarkably, as opposed to the PLX.
That experiment doesn't really require a physics lab and a particle accelerator to reproduce. It seems more like old news. No one seems to seriously give a fudge enough to attempt it, probably because by now no one has too many expectations for 'supreme' Technics like performance out of the PLX. Given enough time it would probably go down in history as just another Technics clone out of the Hanpin plant. We seem to forget those very quickly. It was just the same shebang with the Stanton ST-150 a few years back. Even the pricing policy was identical. It's old news now and no-one is experimenting with it. What for...
We should probably place wagers on who's gonna be the TT maker / audio distributor that comes up with the next Technics / Hanpin clone. Philips maybe? Yama? That'll resurrect the likes of this thread again and probably encourage more experiments and comparisons. My money is on the prospect it will never, ever outperform the original. On a positive note - they might get the anti-skate to work by then.