i wouldn't use Bennics for anything...
I'd use ERSE's
What's wrong with Bennics?
i wouldn't use Bennics for anything...
I'd use ERSE's
LOL - what an unnecessary scare! But glad it's all OK.
Interesting to know the old caps were close to spec…..I didn't test mine, but have them and may just do that some time for grins.
Curious why you changed all the inductors? Hope this doesn't change the voicing of the speakers - did you get exact duplicate specs? I don't see folks changing those often unless they are damaged or are attempting to "upgrade" and revoice the originals. Just curious, thanks and great progress!
What's wrong with Bennics?
Glad Indyaudio found you the wiring info you needed, I thought you were reffering to the series-parallel wiring of the drivers.
You know that Home Depot and Lowes have innertubes for handtrucks right?
My Q bases were completely shot from water damage when I got them. I built new ones from birch ply and yes, the contact cement method is the way to go.
Please post pics and impressions once you have them set up!
IMHO, the original ceramic pots are, ahem..., junk. I wouldn't hesitate to replace them with new 4 ohm pots if I needed to. Buddha6's pots look to be much better made examples than what's typical.
I guess it's worth noting again that Infinity used Potentiometers in the Quantums, not Lpads, even though it seems like a Lpad would make more sense. That may be why it was reported that the Pots used had minimal effect attenuating, something like +-2dB. What they did to the impedance in the circuit and the resulting crossover frequency changes I can't say.
There are vintage mil-spec 5 ohm 25 watt pots available on ebay but they look huge.
i found these...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/130697071117?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
hmmmm, upon further review they don't seem to have a back on them, unless its off for the pics...