eriathomas
Active Member
https://audiotechnicanewsroom.com/2...next-generation-model-of-the-legendary-at95e/
Why? It's uglier than the original.
Why? It's uglier than the original.
https://audiotechnicanewsroom.com/2...next-generation-model-of-the-legendary-at95e/
Why? It's uglier than the original.
Impressive. Somebody at AT has clearly had enough of third parties selling advanced styli for the 95.
https://audiotechnicanewsroom.com/2...next-generation-model-of-the-legendary-at95e/
Why? It's uglier than the original.
The threaded inserts are a HUGE step forward. EVERY cartridge should use same.
I will not be entirely surprised if the metal cart body underneath the bodywork is exactly the same as the old model.
note these new VM95 bodies are clearly labeled "China"
Only the first two, the C and the E. Starting with the EN, the label says they're made in Japan. Don't know what significance this has, but I'd get the EN for that alone, if not something higher up.note these new VM95 bodies are clearly labeled "China"
The label is where the screw was on the old 95, so maybe they just covered it.I noticed the plastic top is now apparently bonded to the metal body. The screw is gone. So maybe this is in fact a redesign rather than a facelift.
+1. I have to wonder what this means for the recently revamped 510CB and 520EB, which are supposedly higher up the line but don't have the threaded sockets, despite the price premium.The threaded inserts are a HUGE step forward. EVERY cartridge should use same.