New speakers in today...Eosone RSF 200s. I got them on EBay for $70 (actually $57 after an EBay bucks certificate earned from buying my other gear
). I saw them on there and figured I would buy them to use in my computer setup, especially since I had just gotten all 7 of my Onkyo speakers, the 4 satellite stands, and the Onkyo sub sold and out of the house (for a good chunk of change). Currently, they're in the Kenwood system for testing.
This was the first time I was able to A/B the Eosones against a pair of Boston Acoustics (VR20s directly and CR8s indirectly). Man, the Eosones really do beat the Bostons (at least the VR20s and CR8s). The Eosones are crystal clear and smooth and have nice full bass. They sound like their big brother RSF 600s, just a bit less bass. The Bostons sound a bit muddy, lacking in bass (7" vs. 8", so understandable, but the Bostons have the advantage of tower vs. bookshelf), a bit harsh, and slightly muddy (especially in the midrange - voices sounded muffled) in comparison. It's not bad enough to make the Bostons sound bad, but it's still noticeable and they don't sound as good as the Eosones. Certainly noticeable enough that I found myself switching back to the Eosones as fast as possible, feeling very pleased when I did. Turning down the treble a tick helped the Bostons along, but the Eosones were still smoother. Imagining, soundstage, and depth were excellent with both speakers, but the Eosones edged out the Bostons there as well. Everything sounded more real on the Eosones, which meant they have better timbre, and this (along with the rest of the tonal qualities) led to a more gripping and powerful sound that was a lot more enjoyable to listen to. The height of the VR20s probably contributes to a bit of this problem as they are only 32" tall, however that's not something I would be able to change very easily so they are what they are. Even the CR8s, which were in the same position as the Eosones, were bested by the VR20s in a direct comparison so were really bested by the Eosones.The positions of both speakers are not ideal, but they are not ideal in about the same way for both speakers so that eliminates that variable at least partially.
I did find the Bostons to be more revealing than the Eosones of bad recordings,
however the Eosones still shined more than the Bostons on good recordings. For what I listen to, having both of those traits is definitely a good thing. I just want the best sound for
my music.
The Eosones are heavy for their size, around 20 pounds apiece (shipping weight was 41 pounds for the pair). I expected nothing less, considering the heft of their big brothers. The VR20s weigh around 30 apiece and the CR8s are about 16. That definitely speaks volumes about their build quality, because they weigh around 20
without grills.
For $57, I have an amazing set of speakers. The Boston VR20s, while they still sound nice in comparison, are clearly beaten by them. It's interesting that the Eosones bested them so handily considering they both cost pretty much the same in the mid-90s (~$600 for the RSF 200s vs. ~$550 for the VR20s). That just goes to show that price isn't everything, and design and build quality can make a huge difference.
My dad and I are probably going to try to make some new grills for them. The vinyl is cracked on the top front of left speaker, but I might just leave it because that looks to be a pain to fix. There are some surface scratches, mainly on the top of the right speaker. Those three issues (plus the lack of brand recognition) brought the price down, which was fine by me. I can deal with some minor cosmetic issues for that price
, especially since the grills can be replaced (except for the logo, which will sadly be missing).