He's now at $1900.
My concern is that I think i need to put some money into it to make it function properly - recap, etc.
Decisions time. Any AK wisdom appreciated.
Thx
Prices on these are ALL over. I'm seeing eBay examples as low as $700, and nice ones up to $2k+. Realistically I don't think $1900 on Craigslist is reasonable, but it's a pretty rare amp. If it were me, and I wanted it, I would either wait a bit to see how much lower the seller will go, or I would just go take a look and bring cash, and make an offer. That one has been up for a month now, so it's entirely possible that you could get it for substantially less. Or you can play the "it's my dream amp and I really want it and it's going to a good home but it's a ticking time bomb and it'll cost me a fortune to have it rebuilt" card and see how that goes.
I would not buy one for $1900 if it had not been restored. $1500 is the most I would spend on an unrestored example if it was in mint condition. You are right to think it will need work to work properly. Maybe it has been, any shots of the underside?
This is my opinion exactly. $1500.00 super nice unrestored and working. Super nice, restored capped etc, $1900.00 or a bit more and I'd be happy.I would not buy one for $1900 if it had not been restored. $1500 is the most I would spend on an unrestored example if it was in mint condition. You are right to think it will need work to work properly. Maybe it has been, any shots of the underside?
I think everyone under estimates the real value of it. He should put it on ebay, and if it went for less than 4 grand I would be surprised.
That looks completely untouched to my eyes.
Yes, the circuit is in fact very similar to a McIntosh. They employed a cathode feedback circuit on the output tubes which helps to lower distortion. In the AU-111, this circuit runs through a dedicated winding in the output transformers.
I think everyone under estimates the real value of it. He should put it on ebay, and if it went for less than 4 grand I would be surprised. If it were not that I have so much stuff already, I would grab it myself.
(The pic link is in the original post above)Though it uses cathode feedback in the output stage the AU-111 circuit should not be confused with the (unity-coupled) Mc Intosh circuit, but is rather comparable to a QUAD II ouput stage. Cathode feedback ouput stages were used by other U.S manufacturers to help reducing distorsion but they aren' t actually a Mc Intosh circuit.
Regarding the AU-111's current market value I think 3 to 4 grand is just crazy and totally overrated : it's admittedly a nice looking classy amp but looking inside I can only see the typical japanese low grade components (Elna and Shizuki oil caps, cheap resistors... which all must be replaced now) and cramped wiring mess, similar to what can be found in other cheap japanese Hi-Fi gear from that era, like National, TRIO, Pioneer,etc... and the 1st stage of the phono preamp section use solid state devices (transistors) which isn't a good point I.M.O.
Surely, once restored it has the potential to sound good but still I don't understand why it should cost 3 to 4 times more than an equivalent U.S made vintage amp which uses higher quality parts,materials and better workmanship. It's even more expensive than a Mac ! I would never pay over 1000$ for a unrestored AU-111 in good cosmetic condition, for 3000$ (or more) the internals must at least looks like THIS