Recommendations for negative scanning?

Discussion in 'Cameras and Photography' started by mhedges, Jan 15, 2018.

  1. mhedges

    mhedges Super Member

    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    I have some color negatives I want to get scanned, but it seems like I'm about 5 years too late as far as finding anyone local to do it. So I guess I have to send them out. Anyone have any recommendations?
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2018
  2. Redikilowatt

    Redikilowatt Audio Understudy Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,464
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    There are several relatively cheap products available for moderate to low quality scans.
    The are good for scanning a lot of film quickly so you can figure out which ones are worth sending to pros.
    The quality is OK for viewing on monitor and perhaps up to 4x6 printing. However, they lack resolution for high quality print.

    If you pass through my neck of the woods I will be happy to let you borrow one.
    The Wolverine F2D Super was purchased from another AKer.
    I found the ION PICS 2SD at a local thrift and couldn't resist. Both will scan slides and negatives (110 & 135).
    Roger
     
  3. mhedges

    mhedges Super Member

    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    Thanks but my friend already has something like that. I want a high quality scan, usable for larger prints.
     
  4. Redikilowatt

    Redikilowatt Audio Understudy Subscriber

    Messages:
    2,464
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    Got 'cha.
    I was in prepress in print industry. High end drum scanners were common in print shops but not so much anymore.
    Good luck!

    Roger
     
  5. Wildcat

    Wildcat Spring ain't here... Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,960
    Location:
    SCS, MI (near a lake)
    Many years ago (I'm thinking 15 years now), I picked up a Minolta Dimage slide/film scanner on eBay. Never worked right--it had a bright line through the photo about a third of the way down from the top. Naturally, couldn't find drivers for a modern OS to try it again. That's when I tried VueScan, and it actually cured the issue I had with the scanner. Works perfectly now. It's very slow, especially if I scan something in two or more passes, but it seems to do well with quality. What's cool is that it also scans using infrared, so it has a way of using both the infrared and color scan to help eliminate dust and scratches. When I bought the scanner, it was refurbished, so I would think it's pushing maybe 17-18 years old. Probably would be tough to find one now. They were more popular back then. I only wish I had found the APS-C attachment so I could scan my APS film cartridges. (It was a $100 option at the time.)
     
  6. leesonic

    leesonic Hold on, here comes the bass. Subscriber

    Messages:
    4,469
    Location:
    Southern NJ
    I know nothing about this, so this might be a basic question. How do you alter the color of the negative to become a positive, or does the software do that for you?

    Lee.
     
  7. mhedges

    mhedges Super Member

    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    I believe the software reverses the color and removes the amber tone.
     
  8. jbailey930

    jbailey930 AK Member Subscriber

    Messages:
    771
    Location:
    N. Va
    hmm, around 6 years ago I borrowed a friend's older NikonCoolscan for approx 300 negatives. It was cumbersome and time consuming. When I shoot film not, maybe 1-2 rolls a year, I have the processor print as well as make digital copies.

    I heard about www.scancafe.com on photog forums I frequent. You pack up your negatives and send overseas. My recent Google search shows some not so great review though. This link appeared in my search http://www.digmypics.com/pricing.aspx

    Let us know what you end up doing.
     
  9. Wildcat

    Wildcat Spring ain't here... Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,960
    Location:
    SCS, MI (near a lake)
    Yep! Usually in the scanning software, you specify what it is you're scanning. (If I'm not mistaken, VueScan might even ask which brand/type of film or slide you are scanning, such as Kodachrome or Ektachrome.) Then the software knows what to do with the scan output. I know we could make those adjustments in Photoshop/Lightroom if needed, but having the scanner take care of it just takes some of the fuss out of it. Same with any noise (dust/scratch) reduction--better to have the software handle it, but only if the software can do a better job than any Photoshop/Lightroom filter. (Surprisingly, Polaroid used to offer a Photoshop plugin which worked better than those Adobe provided.) Gotta admit the infrared trick works better than any other I have tried, and any remaining blemishes are easily fixed elsewhere.

    Definitely. Scans take a while. If I know I want to scan something, though, I can do it while I'm working on other things, and stop every so often to reload a new negative or set of slides. I cringe, though. I have a few dozen sets of my own to scan, plus my dad left me with dozens more that have many long-departed family members in them.
     
  10. mhedges

    mhedges Super Member

    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    My friend tried to do some scanning for me. I'm not sure what he was using. Some of the file sizes were insane. Like almost a gigabyte. But I didn't think they looked all that great. I may just be expecting too much. I'm not sure what is reasonable.
     
  11. Wildcat

    Wildcat Spring ain't here... Subscriber

    Messages:
    3,960
    Location:
    SCS, MI (near a lake)
    I think my TIFF scans were in the neighborhood of 56MB each. 1GB seems awfully large. Unless the resolution was kicked up to some extreme value, I can't think of any other reason an individual scan should be that large.

    @mhedges As for quality of the scan, what did you find disappointing? It might depend on the scanner, but I know that a film scanner should have a micro-focusing ability so that any wrinkles or warps in the film are accounted for. (Otherwise you would see large areas that were blurry.) Even with that, scans look...well...different from digital photos. Whether it's better or not, it's hard to say, and also highly dependent on film used. The last few scans I tested came out well, but needed a little massaging in Photoshop to tweak levels, color balance, etc. Here are two of those, from 1989 (Kodachrome):

    upload_2018-1-16_15-54-21.png

    upload_2018-1-16_15-54-54.png

    upload_2018-1-16_15-57-33.png


    I should point out that in my dad's old slides, the Ektachrome really had a lot of color shift into the maroon side of the spectrum. Took some heavy color balance changes to correct it, but it worked--all the natural colors were still hidden in there. An incorrect color balance can make or break a photo, especially when it's bad to the degree these were. (The old Kodachrome slides, 60 years on, were still pretty much color-correct!)

    There used to be ways to scan negs/slides on a flatbed, but never tried them. I didn't think the scanning engine had the resolution to do them properly.

    -----------------------

    FWIW, I was just kicking around in VueScan for a moment here. If I choose 35mm film as a source, that is where it gives me choices in film.

    upload_2018-1-16_15-42-1.png

    And this is under the Color tab (there is a "Generic" option for vendor, along with a handful of major film brands):

    upload_2018-1-16_15-42-38.png
     
  12. old_tv_nut

    old_tv_nut See Yourself on Color TV! Subscriber

    Messages:
    13,363
    Location:
    Sahuarita
    By the way, how many is "some?"

    Edit: And what film size?
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2018
  13. mhedges

    mhedges Super Member

    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Greensboro NC
    Not many. 5-10, I think. They are all 35mm.
     

Share This Page