toxcrusadr
Omelette au Fromage
Ah, apparently there is a whole theory that Monsanto and others are developing aluminum resistant seeds for various reasons. Monsanto specifically says they are not.
There IS some research on GMOs for aluminum resistance. The reason being that in certain areas, soil has naturally high aluminum, AND has an acidic pH which means the Al is mobile and available for plant uptake (rather than sequestered in insoluble salts). At the same time, many crops are being grown in places they did not originally evolve to grow in, so they are not particularly resistant to aluminum toxicity. MIT - a source that I trust - has a mag article about research on this:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/410926/toxicity-resistant-crops/
It mentions barley, wheat and corn.
There is really no reason to put Al onto crops, but some people seem to have developed theories along the lines that Monsanto can control the entire food market if their seeds can withstand this toxin and no one else's can. But it would have to be spread in massive amounts everywhere to kill everyone else's crops, which just isn't going to happen. Unless you believe the chemtrails are actually aluminum and are sponsored by Monsanto. I like this one guy's analysis, it's something I'd do: he calculated the amount of Al required to increase Al levels in the top 6" of arable land in the US by 1%. Note that Al is a major element in the earth's crust and many soils have percentage levels already. Anyway the amount required would be equivalent to 40 years of total worldwide production of aluminum!
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-monsantos-aluminum-resistant-gmos-and-chemtrails.t341/
Really, it's just a soil chemistry problem they're trying to get around with these GMOs. The aluminum is already there.
There IS some research on GMOs for aluminum resistance. The reason being that in certain areas, soil has naturally high aluminum, AND has an acidic pH which means the Al is mobile and available for plant uptake (rather than sequestered in insoluble salts). At the same time, many crops are being grown in places they did not originally evolve to grow in, so they are not particularly resistant to aluminum toxicity. MIT - a source that I trust - has a mag article about research on this:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/410926/toxicity-resistant-crops/
It mentions barley, wheat and corn.
There is really no reason to put Al onto crops, but some people seem to have developed theories along the lines that Monsanto can control the entire food market if their seeds can withstand this toxin and no one else's can. But it would have to be spread in massive amounts everywhere to kill everyone else's crops, which just isn't going to happen. Unless you believe the chemtrails are actually aluminum and are sponsored by Monsanto. I like this one guy's analysis, it's something I'd do: he calculated the amount of Al required to increase Al levels in the top 6" of arable land in the US by 1%. Note that Al is a major element in the earth's crust and many soils have percentage levels already. Anyway the amount required would be equivalent to 40 years of total worldwide production of aluminum!
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-monsantos-aluminum-resistant-gmos-and-chemtrails.t341/
Really, it's just a soil chemistry problem they're trying to get around with these GMOs. The aluminum is already there.