The most expensive component of my support is the Clearaudio Magix. I have seen Chinese versions of the same idea selling for a tiny fraction of the cost of the Clearaudio Magix.
Again I have no experience whatsoever with those products nor have I ever read one single testimony from a user whether they are effective or a rip-off. If however they work as well as the Magix it could bring the cost of this method within reach of the average diyer.
So what did you do to determine the COG of the table?
Regards
Mister Pig
Perhaps we need to barricade our tables!
Although you and I share a love for the amazing Yamaha GT-2000' I am not quite onboard yet with this direction. Assuming you already have the table on a massive piece of stone (as we both do) and considering not only the huge mass of the plinth but the well designed feet, I have to wonder exactly how much sound/vibration is coming up this path.
Compared to...
The sound waves traveling through the air affecting the cover, arm and basically every part of the table directly. Now if you were advocating putting the table in the next room or locating it inside one of those printer silencers from the 80s (before laser printers - anyone remember big and loud dot matrix line printers?), I wouldn't question you. But I'm at a loss to explain why everyone is so hell bent to isolate the table's feet when the sound waves in the room can so easily and directly affect every part of the table anyway.
Why do we ignore the 'elephant' in the room ( the very music we are listening to) in our discussions around turntable isolation?
Jblnut
The transformation of the sound of an already very capable turntable has to be heard to be believed. It is not a small incremental upward shift in sound quality(when tuned). It is a large leap forward. Well worth all of the refinements and years of experimenting with how to optimise this method.
So what specifically does 2,500$ worth of magnets do to the sound? Do you have measurements or comparisons?
For the same reason that users of Scanning Electron Microscopes and other precision scientific instruments isolate their instruments from ground borne structural vibration.
Theo - I want to thank you for sharing both in pictures and in words what you have been trying to tell us about for some time. I did not mean to put you on the defensive in this thread. It's in my nature to "question everything" and unfortunately that rubs some folks the wrong way. We all want to learn not only the basics, but what tweaks, mods and in some cases cutting edge tricks we can do to get our systems to sound their best.
You have clearly invested a lot of time, money and mental energy in the pursuit of de-coupling your turntable from the surface on which it rests. You have posted a lot of very positive things that resulted from that effort. But my fundamental question remains and I don't think it can or should be dismissed out of hand. We can clearly hear and in many cases feel - with our own bodies - the sonic energy the sound waves in the air impart on the room. Should we pretend these don't exist ?
I have known more than one audiophile who has located the turntable in either a separate sonic enclosure (insulated closet) or an adjacent room. I would think that after all you've done and noted in this thread, that you would at least have something positive to say about this next step which you must consider at some point. If this (and I think it is) a thread that says "isolation matters - the more the better", then why not have a discussion here in that direction ?
jblnut
The only explanation I have is that the vibrations coming through solid Earth feeding into the turntable are the most detrimental.
I feel that it takes a very,very good turntable(in a very,very good system) to require this type of intervention.
What I can achieve with this support is a huge improvement when I properly fine tune it.. Huge is the only proper word to describe the magnitude.
It's hard to understand the improvement to an already great turntable, one that you are more than satisfied with, until you hear the improvement. It is especially the great turntables that benefit the most from this type of intervention. They are the ones that have the ability to step up to another level. This support is not adding anything to their ability, just removing some of what holds them back.
I don't think that there would be the same effect with all turntables. I think that the turntable would have to be of a certain level of capability to reveal all of this to the same level that I'm getting. In other words, you are not going to be able to transform a Fisher-Price turntable into a VPI Classic Direct just by putting it on my support and tuning it in. It is not enhancing anything. It is allowing the turntable to perform to its optimum or closer to it. No frogs turning into princes here I'm afraid.
theo... I for one know you don't start any topic willy-nilly so I am paying attention. You also seem to be very excited about what you just put together and what your hearing.
I never really think about or even get involved in turntable isolation threads. The reason being is I have SOTA Stare Sapphire decks and what I feel is the best isolation, built into a table, I tend to scoff at all the home brews people need to do with their tables.
But now you have me wondering...
I have bouncy wood floors and the SOTA's never skips or misses a step when I pound on the plinth, jump up and down, you name it the arm and platter just float in their own world.
The Cosmos platters and arm boards are made of multiple layers of mediums, things like bonded lead, aluminum and acrylic to kill all resonance. I'm using SME Series V arms and Blackbird cartridges, sub chassies are all weight transfered balanced and leveled.
So do you think this would do anything for me to try and invest the time into. I have three of these tables set up in my main system and they're not tables you just move around do to set up a time. Have I already been isolated from "Ground" being on wood floors, racks and the table isolation?