Jeepers!
I am flabbergasted (how does one's flabber gets gasted anyway?)
That we are still 'arguing' about basics such as this must make a lot of designers wearing out their graves doing all that spinning ... (with respect)
.....suggesting engineers from the 50's and 60's had all the knowledge about such things as we do today is silly. The rules have changed without a doubt and though many principles remain valid, there have been a caveat or two added to them as we continue to learn.
Sir,
Respectfully, as you have a relatively free say, I hope to be allowed a reply in sort.
I am an electronic engineer from the fifties and sixties, and have spent most of my professional life in a world-renowned research institution. Thus, by your qualification, I am capable of reacting. As you were not there then, may I point out that: yes, much knowledge has been
added, but the basic rules have
not changed, and today's engineers have
not added a single thing to basics such as then formulated by Thevenin, Kirchoff, Ohm, Tesla and other pioneers. Instead and respecfully, there rather seems to be either ignorance or disregard of basics in some arguments put forth above.
I not trying to be belligerent, only amazed at some conclusions drawn that is in conflict to some degree or other, with electrical basics. When I last checked Ohm's Law was still valid, and wonderous behaviour of metals and electrons suddenly ascribed, are not new discoveries as if we were fools then or had a shuttered outlook in our profession.
In that vein some experiments are easily compiled for good old blind listening tests. E.g.:Feed an (decent) amplifier from a Variac, 'generate' several listening tests each at a lower line voltage, until the audience begins to identify differences. Similarly (this requires some care in setting up), feed mains to the same amp via a normal(?) power chord, alternated with mains feed through two reels of SWG #30 wire, long enough to each drop the line voltage by some 10Vac (we have a 230Vac system) - the reels adding some inductance as well for good measure. The added 20V drop in fed voltage may be part of the experiment, or may be cancelled by feeding from a Variac. (The temperature rise of the spools of wire will have to be watched.)
Too long ago to recall the exact results; just to say: They would broaden the horizons of some.
I am exceeding my welcome: In conclusion: there was an article by Douglas Self some two decads ago, titled: "Why I buy my cables at Woolworths." (At the time Woolworths England was still selling appliances.)