Just for my qualifications - I was the Service manager of Rockville (Md) Kawasaki in 1976-77 - no longer in biz due to the 4 dumbo investors ...
Had a yamaha in 1970, bought a new Honda CL350 in 1972 - swapped it for a Triumph Trophy 500 later that year and never went back.
Tho I did repairs on a number of bikes - and nearly bought a Knucklehead at one point, I generally rode British bikes until I stopped riding circa 1980.
Around 2000 I bought an old Trophy 500 in Nashua NH, barn fresh, got it running, fixed it up, and decided the magic wasn't there
(too many idiot drivers around DC), and since I don't feel immortal like I did when I was 18,
I sold it off and put the money into Audio instead - and here I am now!
My point was simply that Harley is not the peak of innovation -
Otherwise I have no complaints about Harleys - like a small block chevy, they're brute force reliable.
And thus this thread since there are MANY friends of the Harley brand ...
Again, I wish Harley Davidson well and many years more!
But lets not bash other brands - that gets old, the arguments never settle,
and I gather folks here have had both good and bad experiences with them.
Had a yamaha in 1970, bought a new Honda CL350 in 1972 - swapped it for a Triumph Trophy 500 later that year and never went back.
Tho I did repairs on a number of bikes - and nearly bought a Knucklehead at one point, I generally rode British bikes until I stopped riding circa 1980.
Around 2000 I bought an old Trophy 500 in Nashua NH, barn fresh, got it running, fixed it up, and decided the magic wasn't there
(too many idiot drivers around DC), and since I don't feel immortal like I did when I was 18,
I sold it off and put the money into Audio instead - and here I am now!
My point was simply that Harley is not the peak of innovation -
Otherwise I have no complaints about Harleys - like a small block chevy, they're brute force reliable.
And thus this thread since there are MANY friends of the Harley brand ...
Again, I wish Harley Davidson well and many years more!
But lets not bash other brands - that gets old, the arguments never settle,
and I gather folks here have had both good and bad experiences with them.
I would have to disagree with this statement, simple and reliable IMHO is not a bad thing.
A Harley is infinitely rebuildable ,you can ride one forever and it will still hold some value.
A Japanese bike not so much,when something goes wrong inside the engine or trans they are off to the junkyard.
The cost to repair far outweighs the value if you can even get the parts.
You can still get parts for Harleys made 50-90 years ago and even older , there are many examples of bilkes that old still being ridden.
A trans problem on a Japanese bike even a minor one means completely tearing the engine down in most cases,not so with a Harley.
I've been riding the same Harley for over 18 years now and it has never made me walk or call a tow truck.
That says something in my book as the bike nears 200,000 miles.