Well, it looks like the missing victim has come forward: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/trustees-sanctions-better-football-ban-063918993--ncaaf.html
I don't even need to read that. I've read plenty of stuff from that blog before, and it's all been off-the-rails nuts and inaccurate.
Its basically an extremely verbose argument against the claim by the Freeh report that Paterno "allowed Sandusky to retire in 1999 as a respected member of the team instead of a suspected child predator". (<-That's not a direct quote)
Not sure why that little detail requires so much scrutiny, but hey, some people have tons of time on their hands...
I'll just point out one of the facts to show where his credibility and hubris falls apart:First, with respect to the 1998 incident, the Freeh Report says that several authorities promptly investigated and reviewed the matter, including the Department of Public Welfare, the University Police Department, the State College police, and the local district attorney’s office. Freeh Report at 42-47. A “counselor” named John Seasock issued a report that found “no indication of child abuse.” Freeh Report at 42-46. Mr. Seasock interviewed the alleged victim and determined that “there seems to be no incident which could be termed as sexual abuse, nor did there appear to be any sequential pattern of logic and behavior which is usually consistent with adults who have difficulty with sexual abuse of children.” Freeh Report at 44 (quoting Mr. Seasock’s 1998 evaluation of the alleged victim). The Freeh Report adds that Mr. Seasock “couldn’t find any indication of child abuse.” Freeh Report at 45.
The police investigated and “did not question Sandusky at this time,” and the Freeh Report says that “the local District Attorney declined to prosecute Sandusky for his actions.” Freeh Report at 45-46. A “senior administrator” explained that “the case against Sandusky was ‘severely hampered’ by Seasock’s report.” Freeh Report at 46. The University Police also investigatedthe matter and unlike the local police, they interviewed Sandusky. Sandusky claimed “nothing happened” (Freeh Report at 46) and the University Police concluded that “no sexual assault occurred.” Freeh Report at 47.
Why Gricar really decided not to prosecute is no longer available for questioning since he was later went missing and computer hard drive missing.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/...jerry-sandusky_n_1084204.html?ref=mostpopular
1998 – Victim 6 is taken into the locker rooms and showers when he is 11 years old. When Victim 6 is dropped off at home, his hair is wet from showering with Sandusky. His mother reports the incident to the university police, who investigate.
Detective Ronald Schreffler testifies that he and State College Police Department Detective Ralph Ralston, with the consent of the mother of Victim 6, eavesdrop on two conversations the mother of Victim 6 has with Sandusky. Sandusky says he has showered with other boys and Victim 6's mother tries to make Sandusky promise never to shower with a boy again but he will not. At the end of the second conversation, after Sandusky is told he cannot see Victim 6 anymore, Schreffler testifies Sandusky says, "I understand. I was wrong. I wish I could get forgiveness. I know I won't get it from you. I wish I were dead."
Jerry Lauro, an investigator with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, testifies he and Schreffler interviewed Sandusky, and that Sandusky admits showering naked with Victim 6, admits to hugging Victim 6 while in the shower and admits that it was wrong.
The case is closed after then-Centre County District Attorney Ray Gricar decides there will be no criminal charge.
and it's all been off-the-rails nuts and inaccurate.
He is quoting a former federal prosecutor.
The NCAA the other day allowed competing colleges to invade Penn State, trying to poach their players. How embarrassing for O'Brien and his staff to have to deal with this. I guess the colleges have no hesitations to bother their consciences. Yeah, its all about academics. The sanctimony out of that organization is nauseating.
It never ceases to amaze me how readily people are willing to seize what they think is the moral high ground, launch into lynch mob mode, and mete out mass punishment "for the greater good".
Lack of consideration for the plight of the innocent in this situation is one of its most ugly and hateful aspects. Surely it can't be part of the remedy for it?
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...-officials-emails-may-show-sandusky-coverup/1
Penn State e-mails may show Paterno in on Sandusky coverup
E-mails from 2001 between Penn State University's former president, vice president and athletic director discussing what to do about Jerry Sandusky's alleged encounter with a boy in the shower are raising new questions, CNN reports.
The messages from Feb. 26-28, 2001, may illustrate a coverup by former Penn State president Graham Spanier, then vice president Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley.
University officials "knew they had a problem with Sandusky after a 2001 shower incident, but apparently first decided to handle it using a 'humane' approach before contacting outside authorities whose job it is to investigate suspected abuse," CNN reports.
On June 22, Sandusky was convicted of abusing 10 boys over 15 years.
CNN said it does not have the e-mails, but that the alleged contents were made available to them.
In one e-mail, Spanier allegedly acknowledges Penn State could be "vulnerable" for not reporting the incident. "The only downside for us is if the message (to Sandusky) isn't 'heard' and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it," Spanier allegedly writes.
On Feb. 26, 2001, Schultz allegedly writes to Curley that he assumes Curley's "got the ball" about a three-part plan to "talk with the subject asap regarding the future appropriate use of the University facility," ... "contacting the chair of the charitable organization" and "contacting the Department of Welfare."
However, Curley apparently changed his mind and refers to a conversation he had with head football coach Joe Paterno. It's not known what the two discussed.
Curley writes later that he would rather just meet with Sandusky, tell him there's "a problem," and that "we want to assist the individual to get professional help," according to CNN.
Schultz and Curley are currently charged with perjury and failing to report suspected child abuse. They have pleaded not guilty.
The new e-mails could lead to further charges, CNN reports.
There were 4 people and maybe a few more who were aware of the problems with Sandusky ....
Yep, that sounds like four people.
Let's see...
all the football staff
all the athletic department janitors
most of the university facilities maintenance workers
the facilities management staff of the football complex
most of the Penn State police force
some of the Penn State and DPW social workers
a minimum of three Board of Trustees members
secretaries
at least half of the Prosecuting Attorney's office
members of the Board of Directors of the Second Mile Foundation
Curley, Schultz, Spanier, Paterno, the Lead Counsel for Penn State University(Brennan?)