dnewma04
The Healer
The graphs actually fall in line with what I would have expected overall. Very flat response with just a very slight amount of presence in the midrange area. When I had mine, I tended to run the mids and tweets very slightly backed off from the center position to make them a bit more laid back sounding and this explain why. Overall, I'd say these are very impressive, if accurate and help explain why I found the NS-1000X to be one of the better sounding commercially available speakers I have run across. The woofer response is particularly good, IMO but the one thing that is lacking is the off axis response of the individual drivers, though. The one thing that was sort of dissappointing to me is that the tweeters response over the last octave is largely average looking. It makes me wonder what they would have sounded like with a top notch tweeter like a Hiquphon OWI or OWII and I also which I could see a waterfall plot, which I wouldn't be surprised to find wouldn't be their strong point.
Response on axis as well as 30 and 60 degrees off axis
Response with the adjustments at flat and +/- 3dB on the mids and tweets.
Response onaxis with individual driver rolloffs with the 500 and and 6000hz 12db crossover points.
Polar response
Individual driver response graphs:
JA-3114 woofer with carbon fiber cone:
JA-0803 Dome Mid:
JA-0548 Dome Tweeter:
Response on axis as well as 30 and 60 degrees off axis
Response with the adjustments at flat and +/- 3dB on the mids and tweets.
Response onaxis with individual driver rolloffs with the 500 and and 6000hz 12db crossover points.
Polar response
Individual driver response graphs:
JA-3114 woofer with carbon fiber cone:
JA-0803 Dome Mid:
JA-0548 Dome Tweeter: