Dynaco SCA-35 restoration (with stuffed filter cans)

crooner

Tube Marantzed
Hi Guys and Gals!

I've always been interested in learning how to stuff twist lock caps with modern miniature electrolytics. It respects the classic appearance of the unit being restored.

My first patient is a mint cosmetic condition factory wired Dynaco SCA-35 integrated amp from 1965. Frequently, SCA's are "updated" with all sorts of modern caps and PCB boards. I wanted to have a daily driver and also preserve the originality of the unit as much as possible.

I was checking the web and also some very useful posts by AK member "Kcin", on how to proceed with stuffing the cans.

I ended up going with the hacksaw approach instead of the pipe cutter to open the cans. Yeah, it's a little crude but if done carefully the results are quite acceptable. The employee at the Home Depot messed up a can I brought over when he attempted to use the pipe cutter. Not encouraging. But of course, YMMV.

I reused the original Aerovox cans but used NOS bottom twist lock rings from other cans. I was able to reuse the phenolic wafer and tabs from one can. The other came from a NOS donor. I drilled holes on the phenolic wafer to guide the leads to to the tabs.

I stuffed the cans with Nichicon low impedance 105 degree 450V electrolytics. Had to determine the best compromise between physical dimensions and capacitance. High capacitance is useful but the caps may be too large to fit inside the can.

For the dual can, I went for a pair of 82 uf radial units. The original spec is 50 uF. Just the right size to fit comfortably inside the can.

The quad can required a little more ingenuity to fit all four caps. The values chosen were 68uF@ 450V for the three high voltage sections and 150uF @ 50V for the cathode bypass.

Everything was epoxied in place and clamped for 4 hours to ensure a good fit.

As you can see from the pics, the results are very encouraging!

Aside from rebuilding the cans, I replaced the two silicon rectifiers with high speed SF4007 units and added an inrush limiter.

Everything else looks as stock as it gets.

As for the tubes, the original Dynaco branded RCA 7199s and Telefunken 12AX7s tested excellent. Unfortunately one of the original RCA 6BQ5's was a dud, so I ordered a cheap matched quad of Sovtek EL84s for now.

Tonight I'll do the smoke test and post my findings!

1.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

7.jpg

10.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Very nice! The 565s are nice transformers, you should really enjoy that thing.

Thank you!
Yeah the output trannies are the strongest points in the design. The inrush limiter should keep the failure prone power transformer within limits.

Having owned a couple of SCA-35s and a ST-35 in the past, the thing that strikes me the most is the ultra soft clipping behavior. It simply refuses to play any louder!

The only other equipment that does this, in my experience, is the Marantz tubed stuff. So the little SCA is in pretty good company!
 
That is some nice work. My compliments!

Thank you very much!

If everything goes according to plan, this thing should sing quite nicely. I will hook it up to a pair of Paradigm Phantoms I have on hand.

The original cans, actually tested good, but that didn't stop me from rebuilding them. The whole idea was to learn the process, and the little Dynaco was the perfect unit for the job!
 
Looks great, I'm glad you tried it. You see where a tube cutter makes the whole thing a snap though?

A little time investment makes for a great re-build with low $ and much higher quality electrolytics than are available fromt he the likes of CE mfg, and such.

Kcin
 
Yeah, when you see the innards of the typical Twist Lock you wonder how could such a contraption work reliably at all?

The Nichicon caps, should hopefully last another 40 years!

As for the tube cutter, I'm sure it is easy to master. But then, I don't have a lifetime supply of NOS cans in my parts stash!
 
And Kcin, my thanks for all your useful tips and very detailed restoration threads. You inspired me to go ahead and try this thing! :thmbsp:
 
I like the idea, but I'm against the epoxy part, since it makes it impossible to ever get in there again if you need to re-do things, or in another 40 years, if a second re-cap is required.
 
I like the idea, but I'm against the epoxy part, since it makes it impossible to ever get in there again if you need to re-do things, or in another 40 years, if a second re-cap is required.

You have a point there. Although the epoxy's claim as to be "2 ton" strong is an exaggeration. It should be possible to pry open the thing if needed.

In any case, I'm sure future tube freaks will have access to NOS or used cans for a rebuild 40 years from now. Not the exact same, but very close.
 
Success!!

Well, the little SCA-35 is making sweet music as I type.

I put the set of Sovteks in and used the VARIAC to monitor any abnormalities. But to be honest, with the new power supply components this was very unlikely.

I hooked up the SCA to a pair of Paradigms that I got for $10 at a thrift a few years ago.

The source is a E-MU 0404 USB sound card with ASIO drivers hooked up to my laptop playing 24 bit/96 kHz files of some of my favorite LPs.

Listening to Janis Ian's Breaking Silence right now. Janis' voice is as sweet as honey. Bass is surprisingly deep and tuneful on music that actually has deep bass material. I can easily discern individual bass notes. Music seems to jump at you, very lifelike. No distortion that I can detect.

And then there's the Dynaco's inability to clip. Perhaps it's the result of the passive line stage, but this thing cannot be audibly clipped!

This is the behavior I am always looking in an amplifier. And in this regard, it excels. If you want to demonstrate the superiority of tube sound to fellow audio friends, this is it.

Of course, it won't replace my main rig, but for a secondary system is the closest thing to state-of-the-art vintage tube sound!

13.jpg


14.jpg
 
I have one of those too, cost me $100 about 10 years ago. It really does have a sound to fall in love with.

I see yours has 'improved' loudspeaker tags. I should do that too.
 
I have one of those too, cost me $100 about 10 years ago. It really does have a sound to fall in love with.

I see yours has 'improved' loudspeaker tags. I should do that too.

Hi steerpike2!

The gold plated forks are those commonly available on "that auction site". They are simply screwed in, so there are no modifications.

Speaking of the SCA-35, I didn't like the way I rewired the caps last weekend. Too much solder/flux and the wire arrangement wasn't up to my standards. I was probably tired after a long week...:D

So... I rewired the whole shebang again. I used liberal amounts of black heat shrink tubing and made nice shiny solder joints:yes:

I figured since I went through all this trouble re stuffing the cans, might as well wire the thing back together the right way. I'm thinking about the future tech or owner 40 years from now. Hope he likes the results!

Oh, and BTW, I was listening to some Fairport Convention on the little Dyna this morning. Sandy Denny's voice was nicely portrayed. She was in the room with me!

15.jpg
 
My friends are all of the Diepod and mp3 brigade; they looked at the SCA-35 and smirked... until I played something through it!
Then they wanted to bring over their own CDs to hear how they COULD sound!

Then you really disturb them by telling them it only puts out 15 wpc.
 
My friends are all of the Diepod and mp3 brigade; they looked at the SCA-35 and smirked... until I played something through it!
Then they wanted to bring over their own CDs to hear how they COULD sound!

Then you really disturb them by telling them it only puts out 15 wpc.

Yeah, and the SCA-35 is the perfect amp to lure those mp3 generation kids into high quality tube audio. Very compact sized with timeless cosmetics. It packs a wallop, doesn't cost a fortune and can be easily repaired!

I know I would have loved to own a SCA-35 twenty years ago!
 
Yes, I have!

It actually renewed my interest in obtaining a SCA-35.

For my project I went for a factory wired unit that needed nothing cosmetically. Electroplating the chassis and rewiring the whole thing was out of the question. Call me lazy, I guess. LOL!

I wanted to preserve the original appearance as much as possible. Yellow Illinois film caps and blue twist locks would be no-no's! :no:

I also don't like modern plastic cable ties. Thinking about buying a roll of waxed lacing cord to give the unit the finishing touch!
 
Yes,

I think you've taken the more sane approach on this piece... good work! Let me know if you learn how to neatly lace a bundle of wire. I think I've seen the technique documented in an old Navy training book on electricity.

Cheers,

Kcin
 
Yes,

I think you've taken the more sane approach on this piece... good work! Let me know if you learn how to neatly lace a bundle of wire. I think I've seen the technique documented in an old Navy training book on electricity.

Cheers,

Kcin

Thanks!
And yes, I'll let you know how I do with the lacing cord. I'm always in awe when I see a neatly wired piece of military electronics equipment, laced the old fashioned way.

The Marantz top ranks were all military trained, and it shows on their neatly laced wiring! A rarity in consumer gear, even at the time.
 
Hi Guys and Gals!

I've always been interested in learning how to stuff twist lock caps with modern miniature electrolytics. It respects the classic appearance of the unit being restored.

My first patient is a mint cosmetic condition factory wired Dynaco SCA-35 integrated amp from 1965. .......



Very nice job. It looks just like the original. It is great to see someone take the time to preserve vintage equipment. I compare it to the restoration that goes on at the Garber facility in Suitland, MD for the Air And Space Museum of Smithsonian.

I have done this before both ways; uncrimp the bottom or cut off the bottom ring with a saw or pipe cutter. I have also just replaced with components "under the hood". Without doubt, stuffing cans is the most rewarding...
 
Back
Top Bottom