Audiokarma.org
Audiokarma Featured Sponsor

Go Back   AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums > Speakers


We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:54 AM
starchland starchland is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 21
Altec Lansing stonehenge II

how are they worth looking at for 300?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:05 AM
NeilT's Avatar
NeilT NeilT is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 255
Very sweet and very loud and very punchy and very deep and beautifully made cabinets.

Classic medium sized 70's Altecs - I bought a pair way back then and eventually sold them when I moved to a smaller pad. If I lived in NY I'd run not walk.

- Neil
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:46 AM
jimfet's Avatar
jimfet jimfet is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: N.C.
Posts: 13,153
It seems their list were $800 new. We sold them for $700. I think one of the best looking speeks Altec made.
__________________
I'm the one that's got to die, when it's time for me to die.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:29 AM
dshoaf's Avatar
dshoaf dshoaf is offline
That high voltage buzz
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 8,191
Agreed, jimfet. The ones I've always lusted after were the Stonehenge IIIs with the 604 coaxial in it.

As far as marketing goes, this is probably the best name ever given to a speaker. The tall, narrow (for its time) cabinet and the Stonehenge name were brilliant. Unfortunately, Altec's distribution at the time wasn't too good, at least on the east coast and many dealers didn't carry them - at least in my experience. I've never heard the Stonehenge series.

Cheers,

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:41 AM
jimfet's Avatar
jimfet jimfet is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: N.C.
Posts: 13,153
You are correct. We could never get over 2 sets. We would sell out and couldn't get anymore for months. Those were some lovely oak cabs.
They had a papercone tweet, that wasn't the best in the world, but was on par with the rest at the time. Maybe why they went to the coax.
__________________
I'm the one that's got to die, when it's time for me to die.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:49 AM
bowtie427ss bowtie427ss is offline
Parametric Sympathizer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Milk & Honey Boo Boo
Posts: 13,247
Besides parroting what others have already said i would just add that they have a much smaller footprint and more highly accepted WAF than most altecs.

Sadly the Stonehenge II was the most "cheapened up", and only 3-way version using an RCA made woofer and simplified network, but still an impressively good sounding speaker with the only caveat is it's being at the bottom of the efficiency list for Altec.

The Stonehenge I used the very rare 427 woofer comprised of the 414/417 basket and the 416/417 motor and reveals much of the low midrange warmth and "life" of the bigger two-way ancestors.

I think the only reason StonehengeIII got the Stonehenge name was simply from the aspect ratio of it's cabinet, being loaded with 604-8G it really doesn't compare to the other two models in any way.

http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...ome/page07.jpg
__________________
It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere
- Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2007, 08:17 AM
Fuzzy Lumpkins's Avatar
Fuzzy Lumpkins Fuzzy Lumpkins is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Muskego, Wisconsin
Posts: 474
I have a set in my bedroom. The wife never has complained and actually has said how nice they look.

I have a single Stonehenge I with a dead tweeter and no grill. I hate to part it out since the cab is nice but the odds of finding a single and a grill is pretty slim.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2007, 05:05 PM
Wedweb's Avatar
Wedweb Wedweb is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: STL MO
Posts: 380
I have two sets of Stonehenge I's. These are great, and you don't have the run of the mill oak, but afromosian teak.

Though one set has had the woofers replaced with Radio Shack woofers from the late 70's early 80's.

Bo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-14-2014, 05:28 PM
medosmas's Avatar
medosmas medosmas is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lincoln heights-POMONA
Posts: 57
Got one set thinking of parting out

I have a set that I just haven't had the time to take the parts off. Grilles are ok but broken pegs. I think one tweeter has a hole if I recalled.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.



Friends of Audiokarma
We appreciate your help in keeping this site going.
Stereo Repair World
Herbies Audio Lab
Vintage Home Audio
Amps and Sound
Pro DJ Headphones - click here
Organ Donor Parts
Wargos Electronics
Parts Connexion
Sonneteer
Take Five Audio
Sound Stage Direct
Audio Salon
AudioClassics
Audience AV
AV Solutions
Simply Speakers
Tone Arm Audio
BD Enterprise
Musical Paradise
Howard Products
Classic Sound Repair
FM DX Antenna
McIntosh Cabinets
Siliconray
BOI Audio Works
Vinyl Magic Record Cleaner
Amplifiedparts
Grant Fidelity
RSL Speakers
Yesterday's Audio
Urban Antigue Radio
DeWick Repairs
Many Moons Audio
Vintage Electronics Repair
The Tube Store
Politicalchat.org
Audio Doctor
Antique Radio Classifieds
MCM Electronics
Videokarma.org
   
   
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ęCopyright 2002-2014 AudioKarma.org, All rights reserved.