A friend bought a pair of Canto Quinto 530 speakers and asked me to add binding posts and re-cap them. I thought that I'd make use of it to make a data dump here for the benefit of anyone else that comes across a pair of these speakers.
First some specs copied from HiFi Wiki...
General
Technical Data
Weight isn't included above but I just weighed a cab and got 10.2 kilos.
The tweeter and midrange are the same 1087 and 1086 (respectively) drivers found in the Quinto 510 and 520. The 1087 tweeter can also be found in the Canton GL 300F. The woofer is a 3157.
I measured the DCR of the drivers and got 4.0 ohms for the tweeter, 3.7 ohms for the mid, and 3.4 ohms for the woofer.
I measured cabinet wall thickness and got 19mm for the front, sides, back and top walls. But I was surprised to see that the base is 25mm thick. Measured that 3 times to make sure that I hadn't gotten it wrong but it really is that thick.
Some pics...
Cheers,
James
First some specs copied from HiFi Wiki...
General
- Manufacturer: Canton
- Model: Quinto 530
- Production year: 1981
- Produced in: Germany
- Color/Finish: Black, White, Walnut
- Measurements: 285 x 460 x 270 mm (WxHxD)
- Weight:
- New Price ca.: 1100,- DM /Pair
Technical Data
- Cabinet Style: 3-Way Closed, Bookshelf Speaker
- Drivers:
- Woofer: 26 cm
- Midrange: 2,8 cm Dome (Nr. 1086)
- Tweeter: 2 cm Dome (Nr. 1087)
- Load Carrying Ability: 80/120 W (RMS-/Peak)
- Sensitivity:
- Frequency Range: 25 - 30.000 Hz
- Crossover Points: 1000 / 5000 Hz
- Impedence: 4 Ohm
Weight isn't included above but I just weighed a cab and got 10.2 kilos.
The tweeter and midrange are the same 1087 and 1086 (respectively) drivers found in the Quinto 510 and 520. The 1087 tweeter can also be found in the Canton GL 300F. The woofer is a 3157.
I measured the DCR of the drivers and got 4.0 ohms for the tweeter, 3.7 ohms for the mid, and 3.4 ohms for the woofer.
I measured cabinet wall thickness and got 19mm for the front, sides, back and top walls. But I was surprised to see that the base is 25mm thick. Measured that 3 times to make sure that I hadn't gotten it wrong but it really is that thick.
Some pics...
Cheers,
James





















,








