I'm using the MX135 and MC207, and am very happy with the sound. The pair seem to be one of the best options for both top-quality 2-channel audio and HT, and so I've been surprised by the lack of info on the MX135 (minimal reviews or comments) on the web. Are there many other MX135 owners out there?
The unit does surprise me in some areas of its functionality. It is unfortunate that I can only record a digital source to a digital output, and similarly a balanced audio source to an analog output. I wonder why I cannot use the MX135's prestine DAC/ADCs to record an analog source to DAT, for example. Perhaps I'm just missing something obvious, but the documentation seems quite clear on the subject.
The bass management is also not as flexible as it should be... for example, I prefer to use my main speakers for most of the bass and subs to supplement only the very bottom end (below 45 hz). Yet the MX135 is limited to only one sub and a crossover of 60 hz or above. It's not a big deal, but surprising considering the competition. I'm currently using the MC Bass Mode to turn on both my "large" speakers and the subs, and then setting the crossover in the subs... it roughly works, but it's not as flat as it could be with differing specs for each surround-type speaker. some competing A/V controllers allow you to set the sub crossover point for each speaker in your surround sound system -- this is the ideal.
There are other areas too where units such as the Anthem's offerings have better functionalilty at a much lower price point, but overall, I would of course much prefer the MX135. All the key areas are covered beautifully, and most importantly, it sounds wonderful. Even my wife forgave me when she heard it -- now she wants to try tubes!
The unit does surprise me in some areas of its functionality. It is unfortunate that I can only record a digital source to a digital output, and similarly a balanced audio source to an analog output. I wonder why I cannot use the MX135's prestine DAC/ADCs to record an analog source to DAT, for example. Perhaps I'm just missing something obvious, but the documentation seems quite clear on the subject.
The bass management is also not as flexible as it should be... for example, I prefer to use my main speakers for most of the bass and subs to supplement only the very bottom end (below 45 hz). Yet the MX135 is limited to only one sub and a crossover of 60 hz or above. It's not a big deal, but surprising considering the competition. I'm currently using the MC Bass Mode to turn on both my "large" speakers and the subs, and then setting the crossover in the subs... it roughly works, but it's not as flat as it could be with differing specs for each surround-type speaker. some competing A/V controllers allow you to set the sub crossover point for each speaker in your surround sound system -- this is the ideal.
There are other areas too where units such as the Anthem's offerings have better functionalilty at a much lower price point, but overall, I would of course much prefer the MX135. All the key areas are covered beautifully, and most importantly, it sounds wonderful. Even my wife forgave me when she heard it -- now she wants to try tubes!