zilch, man, this is an 'over-the-top' contribution. :thmbsp:
wayne, enjoy your 'advanced class' econowave posts. :thmbsp:
these have got to be linked up on the page 1 index. nice work guys. this is fantastic work.
both money and time are scarce right now, so i am still thinking through my project. as for woofer matching to the econowave, one that i've been eyeballing is the bms 15s320. appears to be well built, plots on their site appear encouraging, models kind of like the jbl 2226, but costs a little less money. if i go that route, then i would need subs, which would also employ p.a.-style woofers.
alternatively jbl 2235's (either new or recones) seem to be getting lots of props. my concern with 2235's (or any 15" with an fs on the lower side; most p.a. lines including bms don't have 15's with low fs like the 2235) is that they might be trying to do too much. in a larger, low tuned cabinet, there is going to be lots of cone motion when the bass get's pumping. i'm concerned that this might muddy up the mid-range as the volume gets turned up. the idea of helper woofers (.5 style) doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense to me. it would seem to make more sense to just put the extra woofers in separate cabs as subs.
so, the questions are:
1. any thoughts on bms 15s320 for matching to econowave?
http://bmspro.com/15S320.bms_15s320.0.html
2. at what spl (or even better what cone excursion) does it become better to separate the bass from the mids, so the former doesn't muddy up the latter?
thanks.