Let me put it this way: It seems kind of, well, "silly" to be choosing a tweeter based upon flange size rather than performance when it's relatively easy to make flange adapters for just about any tweeters to make them fit.
I recall reading about tweeter replacements on the Classicspeakerpages website where an appropriate replacement for AR3, I believe it was, had been found, and everybody was whining about the flange size. Ultimately, the distributor had to get a bunch of them stamped out in order to sell tweeters. You can make them out of virtually anything from a vinyl floor tile to 1/4" steel. I did mine in aluminum with a couple of hole saws.
While the motivation to upgrade to a "modern" tweeter is reasonable, it's virtually a given that the sound will not be the same as the originals. Not that that's a bad thing, but where does one begin to make a rational selection based upon performance?
http://www.zaphaudio.com/tweetermishmash/
More importantly, where does one stop? You're going to make a selection of the basis of someone on some forum saying they stuck something in there and it sounded good? It's a bag of snakes, and the bottom line for "upgrade" of AR and other vintage acoustic suspension speakers is, ultimately, all you have left is the logo. Let them be. Restore using original drivers, or follow the recommendations of AR enthusiasts who have done a comprehensive evaluation of alternatives. :yes:
[Not some vendor, either, unless it's "Satisfaction Guaranteed...." :nono: ]