beatcomber
AK Member
I've read on numerous boards about using heat shrink tubing on the tonearm wand of SL-1200s, to reduce unwanted vibrations, which is considered one of the primary drawbacks of the Technics arm.
I decided to give it a try, and picked up a 2-pack of 3/4" tubing at the electrical section of Home Depot for $1.99. (Note: 1/2" tubing is slightly too small to fit over the end ring of the tonearm.) It was a bit of trouble to get the tubing hot enough to completely shrink around the wand. I started with a hair drier and a small cube-shaped space heater, and that got it about 80% shrunk down. I finished it off with a cigarette lighter, actually running the flame over the length of the rubber tube. I was careful to move it quick enough so that the rubber didn't melt and drip off. It took about 15 minutes to get it tightly formed around the tonearm wand. After letting it cool, I mounted the headshell, reset the VTF (since the rubber added some mass), and sat back to listen.
I wasn't sure what to expect. What I immediately noticed was extended top end - it seemed "brighter" until I realized that there was no loss of bass response, which also seemed a bit tighter. I also immediately noticed how much quieter backgrounds had become. The few seconds between tracks on the LPs were virtually silent. Vastly improved also was the top end 'bloom' and front-to-back imaging, two areas that are often cited as weaknessed on SL-1200s.
Visually, the tubing doesn't look that bad either. Here are some images I lifted from http://home.comcast.net/~omaille/audio/SL-1200/1200Mods.html:
Bottom line, this mod is simple and cheap, and completely reversible. The tonal improvement is significant and not subtle too; my SL-1200 has just been kicked up a few notches, performance-wise.
I urge all of my fellow Techniphiles to try it for yourselves and see if you don't get the same improvements that I've described.
I decided to give it a try, and picked up a 2-pack of 3/4" tubing at the electrical section of Home Depot for $1.99. (Note: 1/2" tubing is slightly too small to fit over the end ring of the tonearm.) It was a bit of trouble to get the tubing hot enough to completely shrink around the wand. I started with a hair drier and a small cube-shaped space heater, and that got it about 80% shrunk down. I finished it off with a cigarette lighter, actually running the flame over the length of the rubber tube. I was careful to move it quick enough so that the rubber didn't melt and drip off. It took about 15 minutes to get it tightly formed around the tonearm wand. After letting it cool, I mounted the headshell, reset the VTF (since the rubber added some mass), and sat back to listen.
I wasn't sure what to expect. What I immediately noticed was extended top end - it seemed "brighter" until I realized that there was no loss of bass response, which also seemed a bit tighter. I also immediately noticed how much quieter backgrounds had become. The few seconds between tracks on the LPs were virtually silent. Vastly improved also was the top end 'bloom' and front-to-back imaging, two areas that are often cited as weaknessed on SL-1200s.
Visually, the tubing doesn't look that bad either. Here are some images I lifted from http://home.comcast.net/~omaille/audio/SL-1200/1200Mods.html:
Bottom line, this mod is simple and cheap, and completely reversible. The tonal improvement is significant and not subtle too; my SL-1200 has just been kicked up a few notches, performance-wise.
I urge all of my fellow Techniphiles to try it for yourselves and see if you don't get the same improvements that I've described.