• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Energy 2.2i Need help

ZeroG

Super Member
Moving this part of the discussion from Speakers.

I currently have a pair of Energy Veritas 2.2i and center channel 2.0i. The top end sounds a little too hot to me, a bit on the shrill side. Overall I find them fatiguing, and I would like to make them sound better. I haven't gotten rid of them yet because they are such an expensive speaker and I would prefer to make them work for me - somehow.

That said, in the same room I also have a pair of L110s and ADS L810s. To my ears the L810s sound the best, particularly on jazz. Rock sounds better on the JBLs. Home theater sounds better on the Veritas. Sorry, but that's what I hear.

Still, I would not get rid of the 2.3is so easily. In the demo rooms they sounded head and shoulders above the rest, with the exception of the 2.4i.

Seems that rock sounds best on the JBLs because JBL was the studio monitor of choice back in the day and most classic rock was mixed on JBL.

FWIW, Klipsch (which bought Energy parent company API) tech support tells me that even though new Veritas and other Energy-branded speakers are being built, that API actually went out of business and the older parts are no longer being produced. He said Klipsch bought the name and the old stock.

Not sure how accurate that is. My 2.1's were warranty upgraded by Energy (just pre-Klipsch) into a pair of 2.2is (thanks!) which were made in China. The drivers looked to be absolutely identical to the old, the difference being that the defective plastic clad boxes (which often peeled) were now gloss-painted MDF. I would guess that the Canadian plant's equipment went to China, where the current crop of Energy speakers are built.

But if you keep the Veritas, you might want to check with Energy for parts availability in the event you might need a tweeter/midrange module.

I still would not trade for the JBL but sell and convert to something else. OR if you did trade for the JBL the 250 (T/ Ti?) series (triangular) would be in a similar $$ class and would have that presence that only a large woofer gives.




How are your room's acoustics? Any treatments?

I don't want to hijack the thread, but if you haven't looked into that then start there.

To keep it relevant I'll submit that before I treated my room I found the 100t3's to have a shrill top end and unpleasant midrange. After treatements they were surprisingly refined and accurate and much, much more enjoyable to listen to. I'll add that they had kind of fallen out of favor after I got my Vandersteen 2ci's and I pulled them out of rotation for quite some time. While the Vandersteens were in the game I did much of the acoustic treatments. After I got my tube amp I decided to give the high sensitivity JBL's another go. Man, what a sweet transformation the acoustic treatments and ST-70 amp made to the 100t3's.

I would also look elsewhere for upgrades. Not to the speakers but to what they're being fed. Two speakers of varying quality might sound the same on some gear. But at some point, the better speaker will leave the other behind when you get to a point where it can show improvements lost on the other one.

I've done a slow path of upgrade since first buying the Energy's years ago. Went from a Denon 3803 to NAD 2600 outboard amps to a pair of Adcom 2535s to current rig which is B&K @ 200wpc across the front 3 channels. HT is via an Outlaw 990 and 2 channel preamp is via an Emotiva USP.

At this point significant cash for more expensive electronics would be a challenge.

That said, room acoustics might help, but don't know where to begin. Room is about 12 x 18, 8ft ceilings, carpeted.

Moving the Energys farther from the back wall did make a difference, but the room layout doesn't really allow them to sit in the middle of the room.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Changes made upstream of your speakers may very well solve your problem, but IMO it's not the logical starting point. Based on my experience (as well as the testimonials of many, many others) I believe until the room acoustics are optimized (as much as your living situation will allow), upgrades/changes to any part of the system (components, cables, speakers, etc.) aside from the room (because it's part of the system as well) is not going to allow all the potential improvement said changes may offer. For example...if your room has a null between 60 and 100 hz in it's response or is highly reflective, it doesn't matter if you pick up a set of speakers with killer bass and outstanding imaging...you're not going to hear their incredible 60-100hz capabilities and killer imaging. The room simply won't have a favorable response to the soundwaves.

All that having been said can you describe your floorplan for us? Do you have real estate on the wall behind the speakers and behind the equipment rack (assuming it's in between the speakers) to put up some absorption panels? Have a look at these links to get an idea of what you need to be thinking about.

http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=446798
http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=446798
http://www.realtraps.com/art_room-setup.htm
 
Back
Top Bottom