• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

My Citation II was on fire!...literally

Citation II has had many of the caps replaced and bias/grid/cathode safety resistors gone over. However I started it up yesterday and it redplated only one of the tubes followed by a Bar-B-Q shining from inside. The only damage I can see was some burned wires around the tube socket and a burned up cathode resistor.

Any ideas whats caused this mess? Room temperature was around 50 degrees so the amp itself was cold could that make a diff? Also My tech used what looks to be 2 watt cathode resistors, That seems to be a bit much after all it seemed to be putting off some mighty flames. When I did my fisher 500c I used either 1 or 1/2 watt resistors. Why didn't the fuse pop before all of this? HEre are some pics

firstd90shots023.jpg


firstd90shots028.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Wow.

It's a good thing you were nearby when this happened. That tube drew so much current that the covering on some wires caught fire. (think of the glowing wires inside of a toaster)

Fuses don't always blow, so I don't consider them to be 100% reliable.

Did you check the OPT on that channel yet to see if it's also toasted?

. . Falcon
 
Is that speaker wire I see going to those grey (B+?) caps on the top left? :yikes: If so get that crap outta there, it has no buisness having 300+ volts going through it.
 
I'm sorry, but I've warned people time and time again - these amps are AT LEAST 45 years old. A few cap changes and new cathode resistors is a band aid. These amps now have reached the point where a total rebuild is required for reliable performance.

Guys, this is an audio hot rod! It demands careful attention to a lot of different things. You can't just soup up the engine and go for a drive - the brakes may not work! What you see is typical of what occurs when you try to band-aid one of these amps. Let me point out just a few of the obvious issues...

1. What's up with the photoflash caps?? The Marcon/Rubycon caps are very good, and if they properly re-form (under MY criteria!) they can provide excellent performance. But why 3 of them? Both original voltage doubler caps are missing, so I'm assuming the Rubycons are to replace them. If so, it appears part of the doubler used two of them and part used one. This means the voltage will not divide equally, and one of those caps could easily be at risk. Rip that out of there and re-do the doubler right!

The rest of the PS caps appear to have been changed at some point. I don't trust them for a second. They all gotta go.

2. The 2 watt cathode resistors are fine. You can't use tiny wattage resistors in a Cit II. 1 watt is absolute minimum to keep the fuse from popping during transients - I use 2 watters in my rebuild kit and they perform well.

3. Those are the original tube sockets. They're shot. Replace them. How do I know they are original? See the rivets holding them in? That means this is a factory built unit, they had rivets, the kits used screws. It's a pain, but new octal sockets are a must! There's a good chance that what caused the meltdown was bad contact on pin 5 of the socket. Bad contact = no negative bias voltage = runaway tube.

4. This amp still has the original selenium rectifier! How can any "tech" leave that in there? The bias circuit is at risk with this in place!!

5. I have no idea what that is clipped in the diode holder. It's certainly not what belongs there!

6. Look at channel B, terminal post number three. See that wire just to the right of the yellow wire? It's SUPPOSED to be red! It carries supply voltage from the AC balance pot to the terminal board. That wire and many more like it in the amp are toast - and were toast before the meltdown. EVERY wire in that amp needs to be replaced - and now the trafo lead wires need to be cut back to get rid of the damaged parts. New wires need to be carefully and professionally spliced onto the original trafo leads, the splice needs to be double insulated (two layers of good polyolefin heat shrink).

BTW, the AC balance pots are toast - replace them or you'll risk more meltdowns in the future.

7. On the terminal boards themselves I see two resistors that were replaced. Two... just two. I typically find 50 or more bad ones when I redo a Cit II. You can try to save the large brownish resistors, but the old carbons gotta go. Most are well out of any reasonable spec by now. Replace every resistor in the amp - you MAY be able to save a few brown ones. Oh, while the board is being reworked replace those awful (and tired) ceramic disc caps. And replace the screen bypass electrolytics used on V1 and V4 - they are toast for sure.

8. It looks like the speaker terminal screws are rusty. Replace them - and replace the tired RCAs as well.

I could go on and on, but I think the point is clear.

The amp you have is a factory built example, and it has the last generation output trafos - trafos with a resonant frequency of 450KHz, and flat frequency response well beyond 100K. It's worth investing what it takes to make it work right. And what it'll take is a COMPLETE rebuild.

That's going to cost a lot of money, the parts alone are going to be $600.00 or so. And you need tubes virtually for sure. If you aren't capable of doing the work yourself then you need to pay a qualified tech (more about techs in a minute) to install the parts, that won't be cheap by any means. If you can't swing the funds don't use the amp. Set it aside and start saving up to get it done. Or sell the amp. Because trying to use it is asking for even more serious damage.

The damage can be repaired relatively easily at this point - and since the sockets and wiring need replacement anyway it really amounts to very little extra to repair the trafo wires and clean the soot out. The likelihood of any trafo damage is VERY small now - the second time you may not be so lucky. :nono:

Finally, I was not privy to the instructions you gave your tech. If you told him to do the absolute minimum needed to run the amp maybe he did that. But I would have turned you down if you asked me to do that. The workmanship inside this amp is appalling - it's a ticking time bomb. There are more potential failure points than I can begin to point out. How any tech could give that back to you and say it was okay to use is beyond my comprehension. And if he didn't say it was safe to use - well, now you know why he said it.

Why did it occur? The amp is WORN OUT. It should NEVER have been operated in the condition I see from the pictures.

I am sorry if I made you mad - but if this amp is in decent cosmetic condition and fully rebuilt it can go for $2500 plus. Or it can provide years and years of great performance and great music.:banana:

As it stands - or victimized by another band-aid - it's value is only what can be salvaged from it. :tears:

If you want my help feel free to contact me.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, but I've warned people time and time again - these amps are AT LEAST 45 years old. A few cap changes and new cathode resistors is a band aid. These amps now have reached the point where a total rebuild is required for reliable performance.


Guys, this is an audio hot rod! It demands careful attention to a lot of different things. You can't just soup up the engine and go for a drive - the brakes may not work! What you see is typical of what occurs when you try to band-aid one of these amps.Let me point out just a few of the obvious issues...

:ntwrthy::ntwrthy::ntwrthy:

I tell everyone this, why only replace a few caps in a 30+ year old piece of equipment. They are sooooooo cheap why would you insist in keep in a 30 year old cap and replacing another, if your going to do them do it all. I wish people would listed to us that have seen these horrors before but they don't. Just like how people laugh at you when you tell them not to plug in a radio/amp that hasn't been used since 1955. I think weak power caps did it. The new stuff made the old stuff work to hard and POOOFFFF.
 
:ntwrthy::ntwrthy::ntwrthy:

I tell everyone this, why only replace a few caps in a 30+ year old piece of equipment. They are sooooooo cheap why would you insist in keep in a 30 year old cap and replacing another, if your going to do them do it all. I wish people would listed to us that have seen these horrors before but they don't. Just like how people laugh at you when you tell them not to plug in a radio/amp that hasn't been used since 1955. I think weak power caps did it. The new stuff made the old stuff work to hard and POOOFFFF.

Hi Jason,

Redoing a Cit II isn't cheap, so I sympathize somewhat. But you and I totally agree on the best path to take with gear that old. You really need to spend the money to do it right. If you don't it's not a question of IF it will fail, but WHEN. :sigh:
 
Well Jim should have scared the bejesus out of the OP. I sure shuddered. His points are well taken. Now about the original wiring and sockets on old amps: Replace them as a matter of course with the same priority as caps?
 
The real scary thing is if a melt down like this occurred and a person had left the room or say gone out to pick up something at the corner store and forgot to shut it down it could start a real fire.

I'm beginning to think that tube gear should never be left unattended when powered up just for this reason. Even with new or totally rebuilt stuff you can have a tube go south and cause some of the ol' not so magic smoke :tears:. Had a tube go on my rebuilt Pilot 232 and it's ironic but it was my kid who said to me: "dad the stereo isn't sounding right". I was off in the other room on the computer lol. I went and took a look thinking: "what does he know?", only to see one of the EL84s red plating. Good kid:yes:

Cheers

Lar
 
That's the first time I've heard a recommendation to replace the ceramic caps. I think the parts lists for my Fisher rehabs just got a lot longer...
 
3. Those are the original tube sockets. They're shot. Replace them. How do I know they are original? See the rivets holding them in? That means this is a factory built unit, they had rivets, the kits used screws. It's a pain, but new octal sockets are a must! There's a good chance that what caused the meltdown was bad contact on pin 5 of the socket. Bad contact = no negative bias voltage = runaway tube.

i have got to disagree with you about the sockets, Jim. i rarely run across bad sockets unless someone has done a lot of tube rolling. if the sockets fit snugly, they are ok & usually just need a little DeOxit to clean them. i would much rather use those Amphenol sockets than any of those crap sockets coming from china any day.
 
You can't just soup up the engine and go for a drive - the brakes may not work!

Off topic, but this reminds me of back in high school when some friends and I skipped school, and went to check out this Jerry guy's car.

He's got like a 1968-69 Coronet 440. He found a 383 or a 440 to stuff in it.
He babied that motor. Nice, clean and pretty. Aftermarket intake, with a Holley dual feed, all the pretty goodies like valve covers, etc.....Too bad he didn't pay much attention to the rest of the car.....

We jump in and go for a spin. He muttered something about a leaking master cylinder, but he was driving it anyway, so we figured he had it under control.

We cruise around and end up behind the port of entry for Washington and Idaho, when there used to be a stretch of paved road behind it.
We're cruising along about 35-40 mph, and the front passenger side wheel comes flinging off. Smash! scrape! nice.....

So we manage to get the wheel back on, and figure we best get out of there.

We are heading out, and there is only one way. Now there is a Sheriff who decides to block our way out, and stops.
Poor Jerry was really sweating a nut with those bad brakes to keep from hitting that patrol car. We come to stop about 2 inches from hitting the front of the cop car.

Now it's the third degree and ID check. Jerry, didn't have drivers a license. My best friend Jeff, forgot his. I'm the only one with a drivers license on me.

In those days, the police were a bit more tolerant, and mandatory liability insurance wasn't really law, yet.

The cops look at me, and tell me I'm the one with a license. Drive the car back......
Now I knew the brakes were bad, but good lord.......the first four-way stop, I about center-punched a car!

I looked at Jerry, And said: "Ya know Jerry, this is nice car. It drives rather good, and has gobs of power. BUT BRAKES ARE A NICE OPTION!!!!"
 
Well Jim should have scared the bejesus out of the OP. I sure shuddered. His points are well taken. Now about the original wiring and sockets on old amps: Replace them as a matter of course with the same priority as caps?

Keep in mind the Cit II is a special case. Like a high performance car, it needs more maintenance and repair to keep it going properly. Other amps don't need as much attention a) because they didn't run as hot or as hard and b) they may not be as old. Some Cit II amps are almost 50 years old.

But I can tell you to look with great care at power tube sockets. They are vulnerable. And if the wire has lost its flexibility - replace it.
 
To the OP, don't get too down about it. **** happens and hopefully we learn from it. I didn't start out with perfectly restored amps either, and everytime I redplated a tube I learned something from it. After all, it was my amp and my tubes ya know, just like that one is yours. How about starting a thread and letting us help you through a proper "fix up" for that old gal.:yes:
 
i have got to disagree with you about the sockets, Jim. i rarely run across bad sockets unless someone has done a lot of tube rolling. if the sockets fit snugly, they are ok & usually just need a little DeOxit to clean them. i would much rather use those Amphenol sockets than any of those crap sockets coming from china any day.

Robert,

You said "if the sockets fit snugly, they are ok". Sure, that's fine. But to me that's kind of like saying "if it wasn't for his bad liver he'd be in great health!"

Most Cit II octal sockets (and MANY other amps' sockets) do NOT fit snugly anymore.

45 year old tube sockets are tired because:

1. The metal in the tube socket contacts has been thermally cycled many times and has often lost much of it's elasticity

2. The contacts have been stretched by many insertions/removals of tubes, and have been attacked by corrosives in some cases.

3. The insulator material has baked out and may have begun to crumble (look at some 7591 tube bases and see what the heat can do).

When I started working on Citation gear in the late 70s the sockets were almost always fine. That's not the case anymore. Other cooler running gear may still be okay; but I've seen MANY posts here about runaway tubes, etc., that are often caused by tired sockets.

If in doubt - replace! And regardless of where they are made, you still can find a lot of decent sockets out there.
 
That's the first time I've heard a recommendation to replace the ceramic caps. I think the parts lists for my Fisher rehabs just got a lot longer...

Sam,

Unless they are NPO caps, ceramics are awful for audio for a number of reasons. That's why I replace them in Citations and other amps I work on. Of course if they are part of a tuned circuit (like you find in a Citation III or other tuner) then I don't replace them unless I plan on getting alignment done.

In most amps there's just a handful of them in the audio path, and much better caps to replace them with are quite inexpensive. I strongly recommend replacing them.
 
Sam,

Unless they are NPO caps, ceramics are awful for audio for a number of reasons. That's why I replace them in Citations and other amps I work on. Of course if they are part of a tuned circuit (like you find in a Citation III or other tuner) then I don't replace them unless I plan on getting alignment done.

In most amps there's just a handful of them in the audio path, and much better caps to replace them with are quite inexpensive. I strongly recommend replacing them.

What do you recommend in place of the ceramics? Some sort of poly/film caps? There's a specific reason why I'm asking, but I don't want to derail this thread into something completely different. Space is a serious issue in the application I have in mind.

And I've just received a PM indicating that Fisher used NPOs. I'm feeling much better now. :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom