• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Totem Hawks: review

ambient

Super Member
I picked these up in part because of MWalts excellent thread about the search for a modern speaker upgrade. I sold the DQ-10s, the KEFs and even the Sonys (SS-m7s) and took a calculated gamble with the Hawks.

All I can say is that the upgrade was well worth it. I listen to a fair amount of electronic music and I always felt I was missing something in the lower end. The hawks deliver superb bass, despite an innocuous 5.5" woofer. In fact the bass was a bit much in my room until I filled the lower chambers with about 3.5 lbs of sand each. I put on the The XX's first track and was blown away by the bass at the end of the track.

I listen to a lot of jazz and vocals as well, and timbre is what these speakers really do well. Imaging is superb as well. On Bill Evans' Waltz fot Debby, the brush on the drums decay nicely, and the upright bass is a good as I've heard it on my system.

These are simply incredibly well balanced speakers and are ideal floorstanders for smallish rooms (id be shocked if they didnt sound good in larger rooms though). With only a 7"x9" footprint, I have plenty of room to get them away from my rear and side walls; placement was pretty hassle-free.

I strongly recommend these for those with very varied listening habits, looking for true low frequency extension while not sacrificing an iota on the mids or imaging. These are real keepers, and at one half of retail, a steal.

I should add that I'm the second owner so they're fully broken in.

74a1d90e.jpg


07c8a13a.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Excellent!

Tell me more about your room if you don't mind. I'm running the DQ-10s and Sony SS-M7s myself. I'm finding the M7s to be excellent, but finicky in regards to both stands and placement. I'm a big electronic fan as well as jazz and vocal and acoustic, so I appreciate your review.

Any harshness in regards to the tweeter? Any shortcomings noted? Do you find the midrange "polite"? And tuning the bass- is the cavity you put the sand in also the home for the mid/woofer unit?
 
I have always wanted to hear the Hawk and Forest lines...

Totem makes nice speakers for the money.
 
The only Totems I've heard are the Rainmakers which have less bass than these. A good all around bookshelf that does nicely in most smaller to mid-sized rooms. I would imagine these to be a kind of Rainmaker tower?

Though I certainly liked the Rainmakers I was not as bowled over as I thought I would be. Were they better than my LSi-7s? Yes, but not by as much as I was expecting. In fact after listening to the Totems I had a renewed respect for my lowly Polks (the Rodney Dangerfield of bookies, lol).

I suspect that added bass in the Hawks makes "all" the difference, though!

Enjoy!

cnh2
 
Last edited:
The only Totems I've heard are the Rainmakers which have less bass than these. A good all around bookshelf that does nicely in most smaller to mid-sized rooms. I would imagine these to be a kind of Rainmaker tower?

Though I certainly liked the Rainmakers I was not as bowled over as I thought I would be. Were they better than my LSi-7s? Yes, but not by as much as I was expecting. In fact after listening to the Totems I had a renewed respect for my lowly Polks (the Rodney Dangerfield of bookies, lol).

I suspect that added bass in the Hawks makes "all" the difference, though!

Enjoy!

cnh2

The Hawk is a better speaker all around than the Rainmaker, not just the lower end.
 
Excellent!

Tell me more about your room if you don't mind. I'm running the DQ-10s and Sony SS-M7s myself. I'm finding the M7s to be excellent, but finicky in regards to both stands and placement. I'm a big electronic fan as well as jazz and vocal and acoustic, so I appreciate your review.

Any harshness in regards to the tweeter? Any shortcomings noted? Do you find the midrange "polite"? And tuning the bass- is the cavity you put the sand in also the home for the mid/woofer unit?

My room is about 11'x10 with 12 foot ceilings. No treatments other than plenty of LPs and CDs along the side walls. Definitely no harshness detected so far. The cavity is at the base of the tower and is completely isolated from all mechanical/electrical components.

I never quite understood 'polite' as a descriptive term in audio....what's the opposite of polite?
 
I love Totems. Heard the Hawk demonstrated by their designer and was shocked at how much bass came from that little speakers. I was on the fence between the Forest and Harbeth when I bought my Harbeth Compact 7s. The Forest laid waste to any idea that I had about needing at least an 8" woofer for convincing low end performance. I've heard those fill a very large room with wonderful sound.
 
Nice buy! The Totem Hawks topped my short list of floorstanders. I probably would have bought them if I hadn't chose a stand mount.
 
My room is about 11'x10 with 12 foot ceilings. No treatments other than plenty of LPs and CDs along the side walls...

Thank you very much. As you know, I have a pair of the Sonys. I love the cohesiveness of the drivers and timber, but I'm finding my room to be a bit of a challenge. It's about 12' and the depth is hard to say- it's 40' but with lots of breaks. It's a studio layout.


...Definitely no harshness detected so far...

Great to hear. It seems technology has especially benefitted tweeter design. It seems to have really been able to but the best forward in design and material while squelching any inherent issues.

...The cavity is at the base of the tower and is completely isolated from all mechanical/electrical components...

Thanks. I know Monitor Audio does the same on some of it's designs too.

...I never quite understood 'polite' as a descriptive term in audio....what's the opposite of polite?

Agressive. Some reviews have pinned the Hawks as having a slightly recessed midrange compared to some of the competitors. But, this may just be a very flat speaker, with some of the competitors a bit forward in the midrange.

The Totem line seems to be a winner at every level. Congrats!
 
Some reviews have pinned the Hawks as having a slightly recessed midrange compared to some of the competitors.

I like Totems, but this is my finding with all that I've heard (Arro, Wind, Rainmakers, Dreamcatchers, and Hawk iirc). They are very smooth and rich, but kind of laid back imo. Yet they are very musical and captivating, cable of rendering a "magical/mystical" involving sound scape. Perfect for those who prefer this sound. :yes:

The bass on those Hawks is outstanding, even astonishing from such a small driver. Totem's have great bass overall, at least the floor standers.

Great speakers, enjoy!
 
Last edited:
Hey there
I have the Totem Staffs and simply love them them. I spent a ear auditioning speakers from the local high-end shop before deciding on them. I couldn't find a speaker that could really do it all like the Totems.
I also use the beaks. I too was skeptical, but they really do make a difference in the presentation of the soundstage. Spend some time fooling around with the placement of them and I think you'll see what I mean. The only issue I've had with them is they can buzz a bit at certain frequencies. You may not have that problem. My brother has the Hawks and beak combo, and hasn't experienced this. Also be aware too much sand in the chamber can adversely effect the soundstage, which is one of the best attributes of these speakers IMHO.
Congratulations and enjoy!
Mike
 
They don't sound laid back in my system and room...at least in comparison to the stable of vintage speakers I was running before.
 
I was reading about Totem speakers and found this old post. So how did the date end?
Your sig says KEF LS 50.
So made the change voluntarily, or are the KEFs mandatory in your state?

btw, I also have the Heed Phono = nice.
 
Back
Top Bottom