PR Audio
Super Member
For those who don't know about the build, this is the original thread.
It has been a some time now, and all I can say is WOW!!! To me these speakers sound amazingly good for what they are. So clear, decent bass, nice looking, mids to die for, and airy highs. No, they are not perfect, no speaker is, are they good, don't tell Paul Barton, but better sounding that my beloved PSB B15's, much better than my B25's (B25 can go lower). I have said over and over again that as of today my preferred speaker is Revel's M105/106. This is not a Revel M105, but is darn close to its sound; quite a statement, but that's what I feel. I'm sure the enclosure design can be improved (for example, round off the baffle edges), and other things can be improved as to get more bass. I hooked my old Audio Source SA-50 8" sub (very first sub owned) to the system, and the sound got even better. Extremely happy with the results, though I'm still playing with active crossover settings, it seems that the best results are obtained at 700-800Hz, still debating. When I build a passive will most probably go with a 2nd Order LR, though a simple 1st Order Butterworth might work well in this speaker design. Not a crossover guru, so if someone wants to chime in with a suggestion for passive design, it will be appreciated. Also, an L-Pad with -4dB is a good idea, as though both drivers have basically the same sensitivity, the MarkAudio in its OB configuration seems to overpower the vented (1" Dia x 2" L) enclosure HiVi, in the active crossover I have to lower the gain of the MarkAudio by -4dB. But at the same time, it is not "un peo que rompa calzoncillos" (translate from Spanish to English or whatever your language is).
As for the drivers, I expected the MarkAudio CHR-70A.3to be a good full range driver, and used for mids and up, they are extremely good, especially in the high range, didn't expect it to be so good in the high range, they don't disappoint. Though in a single driver design I don't see the MarkAudio to give much bass extension. But, even more impressed with the HiVi M5N, I consider it an overachiever, its sound is extremely good, no wonder the 4" version is highly praised used in PE's Overnight Sensation speaker.
In my case, I didn't design the speaker as to use any drivers. My goal had to do a lot with aesthetics (WAF), so the dims of the enclosure is based on the correct volume for the HiVi M5N, but with width, length and depth had to look right, and the front baffle needed the right height based on my stands, so 16" total height for the baffle seemed correct as to have a proportionally pleasing bookshelf speaker. The drivers were selected based on the combination of performance and looks. The gold-champagne color of the drivers are almost identical. To me a black driver with a driver of another color simply didn't look aesthetically pleasing. Anyways, if you want to do an equal or similar speaker use the driver you think works best and design around them. Personally, I designed the enclosure I wanted, and selected the drivers based on the enclosure. Ak'er Donkey Karma ordered the same drivers as to build the same, he already advised he will round the baffle edges, he will go with a 1st Order passive crossover, and he will experiment with different weights of poly-fill (I will do the same on my end).
I guess that once everything is dialed in and passive crossovers have been installed, in lieu of the active crossover being used, I will try my best to do a proper "review" post.
It has been a some time now, and all I can say is WOW!!! To me these speakers sound amazingly good for what they are. So clear, decent bass, nice looking, mids to die for, and airy highs. No, they are not perfect, no speaker is, are they good, don't tell Paul Barton, but better sounding that my beloved PSB B15's, much better than my B25's (B25 can go lower). I have said over and over again that as of today my preferred speaker is Revel's M105/106. This is not a Revel M105, but is darn close to its sound; quite a statement, but that's what I feel. I'm sure the enclosure design can be improved (for example, round off the baffle edges), and other things can be improved as to get more bass. I hooked my old Audio Source SA-50 8" sub (very first sub owned) to the system, and the sound got even better. Extremely happy with the results, though I'm still playing with active crossover settings, it seems that the best results are obtained at 700-800Hz, still debating. When I build a passive will most probably go with a 2nd Order LR, though a simple 1st Order Butterworth might work well in this speaker design. Not a crossover guru, so if someone wants to chime in with a suggestion for passive design, it will be appreciated. Also, an L-Pad with -4dB is a good idea, as though both drivers have basically the same sensitivity, the MarkAudio in its OB configuration seems to overpower the vented (1" Dia x 2" L) enclosure HiVi, in the active crossover I have to lower the gain of the MarkAudio by -4dB. But at the same time, it is not "un peo que rompa calzoncillos" (translate from Spanish to English or whatever your language is).
As for the drivers, I expected the MarkAudio CHR-70A.3to be a good full range driver, and used for mids and up, they are extremely good, especially in the high range, didn't expect it to be so good in the high range, they don't disappoint. Though in a single driver design I don't see the MarkAudio to give much bass extension. But, even more impressed with the HiVi M5N, I consider it an overachiever, its sound is extremely good, no wonder the 4" version is highly praised used in PE's Overnight Sensation speaker.
In my case, I didn't design the speaker as to use any drivers. My goal had to do a lot with aesthetics (WAF), so the dims of the enclosure is based on the correct volume for the HiVi M5N, but with width, length and depth had to look right, and the front baffle needed the right height based on my stands, so 16" total height for the baffle seemed correct as to have a proportionally pleasing bookshelf speaker. The drivers were selected based on the combination of performance and looks. The gold-champagne color of the drivers are almost identical. To me a black driver with a driver of another color simply didn't look aesthetically pleasing. Anyways, if you want to do an equal or similar speaker use the driver you think works best and design around them. Personally, I designed the enclosure I wanted, and selected the drivers based on the enclosure. Ak'er Donkey Karma ordered the same drivers as to build the same, he already advised he will round the baffle edges, he will go with a 1st Order passive crossover, and he will experiment with different weights of poly-fill (I will do the same on my end).
I guess that once everything is dialed in and passive crossovers have been installed, in lieu of the active crossover being used, I will try my best to do a proper "review" post.