I'd call it a wash, performance wise. For servicing, the 8100 looks easier.
I've had both, and compared them extensively. The Kenwood is very accurate with great extension on top and bottom, bordering on a dry presentation. The Sansui is much richer, warmer midrange, with a darker treble. After I restored the Sansui, it gained the treble extension of the Kenwood, while retaining its warmth and richness. I believe the Sansui, when restored, is in another class above the Kenwood. That's not to dismiss the Kenwood, only that the Sansui is an extraordinary performer. You have to go way up the food chain to find another amp that significantly outperforms it.
As far as other matters go, the Sansui is much more solid in build quality, but the Kenwood is definitely easier to work on. That Sansui is not for the faint of heart!
The Kenwood is good, no doubt. But the Sansui AU-717 is a period icon.
...
...As far as other matters go, the Sansui is much more solid in build quality, but the Kenwood is definitely easier to work on. That Sansui is not for the faint of heart!
...
I've had both, and compared them extensively. The Kenwood is very accurate with great extension on top and bottom, bordering on a dry presentation. The Sansui is much richer, warmer midrange, with a darker treble. After I restored the Sansui, it gained the treble extension of the Kenwood, while retaining its warmth and richness. I believe the Sansui, when restored, is in another class above the Kenwood. That's not to dismiss the Kenwood, only that the Sansui is an extraordinary performer. You have to go way up the food chain to find another amp that significantly outperforms it.
As far as other matters go, the Sansui is much more solid in build quality, but the Kenwood is definitely easier to work on. That Sansui is not for the faint of heart!
The Kenwood is good, no doubt. But the Sansui AU-717 is a period icon.