• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

B&K Reference 2220 - Poking Around Inside

TimPD

AK Subscriber
Subscriber
Starting a new thread on the B&K Ref 2220 to share info.

Looking for more power and, specifically, more current to drive my speakers, I've recently acquired a B&K Reference 2220 for a good price, from a Goodwill in the Midwest.

For those unfamiliar, this amp is rated at 350 W/ch into 4 ohms and can supply 75 A of output current (for comparison the Class D amps using the TI TPA3255 can supply somewhere around 25 A). It is a pretty simple Class AB design, with 5 pairs of 2SK1058 MOSFETs forming the output stage. There is no active protection circuitry, but the rails are fused and the signal is not DC-coupled.

Prior to connecting it to anything valuable I checked the DC offset, which is low (<20 mV) on both channels. It sounds great to my ears, with great bass and great bass control.

After discussion with another AKer, who shall remain blameless, I noticed a barely audible hum at idle. Both channels. Audible with my ear 6" from the speakers and not otherwise. No inputs, no change with input shorted or open. No change with changes in preamp output volume (no source). Hi ho, hi ho, off to the bench we go...

DC rails are all at or about 70 VDC. The AC ripple measured across the cap terminals (15000 uF and the size of soda cans, qty 4) is around 260 mV. This is less than 0.5% of the rail voltage and, per ChatGPT, 'excellent' for a power amp power supply. So my tentative conclusion is that the PS is mostly working properly and I don't need to replace the filter caps.

After unscrewing the PS board from the filter cap screw terminals, I measured 0 V and ~7 V, respectively, of residual voltage across the caps on each channel. So either one side is leaking or one side is more effective at discharging the caps than the other.

The transformer is 650 VA and 5 1/4" in diameter. Eg large. The amp emits a significant magnetic field, enough to induce a major hum into the system if I sit my preamp (Adcom 715) on top of it. So either / both companies didn't shield their stuff well enough. Pass the mu metal sheets. That or something else is broken which I don't understand yet. The sit at a distance now.

There is only about 15 mV of AC output voltage on the speaker terminals at idle. Hard to believe that's audible, but there it is. The hum is not induced into the speaker cables as it does not change when the cables are moved around, but I may try this test again. The transformer has some mechanical hum but it is tight in the chassis.

I can feel heat coming off the driver boards and heat sinks when the amp is at idle. Not alot, but more than I remember from other amps, in my limited experience.

The PS board is B&K part number 10611, Rev C in this case. This board is shared across a couple of B&K amps and populated differently, depending. On this board there are 2 bridge rectifiers. On the recent ST-1400M thread by user @Stoddrob found here, there is only a single bridge rectifier. So the one B&K schematic available should apply to this amp, at least in part.

Next step is to connect an oscilloscope and measure the frequency, or reconnect the amp to the speakers and do an FFT of the sound, if possible. Maybe move the speaker cables around more.

After that I may try to measure the bias current via the fuse holders. Adjusting the bias requires some mechanical disassembly, unfortunately.

Some pics attached FYA. Note the initials on the 5 W MOSFET source resistor. Either someone has been in here prior or this is like (hand-built) Aston Martin engines, back in the day, having nameplates identifying the guy who built them, allowing A-M owners to further engage in pecker contests. :)

Tim
 

Attachments

  • 20260102_115746.jpg
    20260102_115746.jpg
    158.1 KB · Views: 41
  • 20260102_115758.jpg
    20260102_115758.jpg
    183.5 KB · Views: 39
  • 20260102_115804.jpg
    20260102_115804.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 20260102_152647.jpg
    20260102_152647.jpg
    126.1 KB · Views: 31
  • 20260102_152716.jpg
    20260102_152716.jpg
    72.5 KB · Views: 39
Register to hide this ad
I bought an EX-442 (similar design) a few years back with a bad channel.......blown outputs. Very frustrating unit to trouble shoot, & the original mosfets are near unobtanium now.
 
Spectrum analysis of the noise, sampled with an (Android) Samsung Galaxy S22 and analyzed by the Spectroid app. May try again with a UMIK-1 microphone.

The strongest component is around 60 Hz but there are other frequencies present. The furnace was running at the time...

Tim
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260102_202549_Spectroid.jpg
    Screenshot_20260102_202549_Spectroid.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 12
Here is one of the driver boards. Part number 10842, which is described by the publicly available schematic and also used in multiple other B&K amps (according to the schematic drawing).

This board has two trim pots, which appear to be bias current and DC offset per the adjustment instructions.

Tim
 

Attachments

  • 20260103_165507.jpg
    20260103_165507.jpg
    160.5 KB · Views: 22
I've been trying to understand the bias circuit prior to setting the bias. As a way to prep for some casual circuit analysis I re-created part of the schematic in a free online schematic capture tool called SchemaLite. In hindsight I probably should have gone with LTSpice or something similar. I found EasyEDA basically impossible to use. Current result attached.

I have spent a lot of time lately re-learning about bipolar transistors, MOSFETs, and their use in audio amps. Needless to say there are many topologies out there. I earned a BSEE back in the last century but, much to the derision of the professor(s) working on millimeter-wave radar for cars (in 1980), I focused on software and computers. So this has been slow going.

This morning I took a flyer and asked ChatGPT if it could analyze a schematic. It said it could. Uploaded the image. Holy Bleep. :oops:


This amp also has a DC offset control.

Tim
 

Attachments

  • Untitled_Diagram.jpg
    Untitled_Diagram.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 13
I subsequently uploaded the entire schematic, and the AI analyzed the entire thing. PM if you'd like the summary. It is impressive, at least for me, who isn't super well versed in analog design. Great learning tool.

Update: At the suggestion of a friend, I did the same thing with the Google Gemini AI. It produced consistent but more concise output. Both systems made errors, but when pointed out they corrected themselves (!).

The schematics for the Sony TA-F444ES II amps I rehabbed are helpfully labeled to show each amp section and the overall signal path. Not so with B&K. However the AIs will illustrate (in text terms) the path for you. This may be obvious to hobbyists, techs, and amp designers who have invested lots of time in the subject but I found it pretty helpful.

Tim
 
Last edited:
Bias and DC offsets verified today using B&K procedure. Everything in spec. No signs of distress, damage, or repairs to this amp! Cleaned out the dust with a soft brush and buttoned it back up. Great little project and educational experience!

It would have been nice to verify the current through each 0.47 ohm 5 W source resistor but that cannot be adjusted other than by replacing the component, and there are 20 of them.

On to the next Sony TA-F444ES II currently sitting on the front porch. "One weak channel". We'll see.

Thanks for reading.
Tim
 

Attachments

  • 20260106_112105.jpg
    20260106_112105.jpg
    174.6 KB · Views: 17
I just got me a 2220 and I must say I love it! It is one of, if not my favorite, amps. And it has pretty good company with my 12 other amps
 
Very cool, enjoy it.

Mine has some ground hum I'd like to address. Is yours quiet?

Thanks
Tim
 
J -
I think I have tried a couple of cords but I could try again. The ambient noise in my basement, in a semi-rural area, is about 30 dB. So any system noise seems louder than it would in a noisier environment.

I took the amp to Q Audio in Cambridge, MA today. We verified the noise was still present there using a very fancy power cord, but as the environmental noise of the city was higher the hum was more difficult to hear. The owner was puzzled by the noise and called later to point out that the rated SNR of the amp was 95 dB, which is not as good as more modern equipment (100 dB and greater). I don't think that's the problem, nor do I think all modern Class AB amps have 110 dB SNRs...

When you write 'silent', do you mean like 'dead silent'?

Thanks
Tim
 
J -
I think I have tried a couple of cords but I could try again. The ambient noise in my basement, in a semi-rural area, is about 30 dB. So any system noise seems louder than it would in a noisier environment.

I took the amp to Q Audio in Cambridge, MA today. We verified the noise was still present there using a very fancy power cord, but as the environmental noise of the city was higher the hum was more difficult to hear. The owner was puzzled by the noise and called later to point out that the rated SNR of the amp was 95 dB, which is not as good as more modern equipment (100 dB and greater). I don't think that's the problem, nor do I think all modern Class AB amps have 110 dB SNRs...

When you write 'silent', do you mean like 'dead silent'?

Thanks
Tim
How's it looking? Any update?
 
Sorry for the delay, I have been out of town.

Darius (sp?), the owner / tech at Q Audio, went through the amp and confirmed it was operating within spec. The conclusion was that the noise, which was slightly louder in one channel as compared to the other, wasn’t the result of an obvious failure or misadjustment.

On my amp the RCA inputs are located on one side of the rear panel, whereas the driver boards are located on either side of the power supply section. This means the wires connecting one channel's RCA input to its corresponding driver board pass around the rear of the toroidal transformer, whereas the wires for the other channel go more or less directly to the driver board. On my amp the input wires are, or were, a simple unshielded twisted pair, aka UTP.

In poking around inside, probably looking for a loose connection, Darius noticed that by moving the input wire of the "louder" channel he could change the noise level, a useful clue.

The PS in this amp produces a powerful magnetic field, including outside the case. It is enough to induce significant (clearly audible) hum in the two Adcom preamps I've tried with it, when they were stacked on top of the amp, or close to it vertically. I told him this when I brought it in for repair.

So Darius decided to replace the UTP input wires with shielded cable. This seemed to have helped significantly, to the point at which the noise is no longer audible. I would not quite call it "dead quiet" but there is basically no audible noise. The conclusion is that the noise in was induced in the UTP cables by the magnetic field of the adjacent power supply. One channel was quieter as the cable routing was further from the transformer.

He also suggested I try balanced interconnects, but from what I read an unbalanced-to-balanced conversion cable is unlikely to improve matters.
The preamp I am currently using - Adcom 715 - only has RCA outputs.

I do not have access to the amp right now else I'd post a photo of the cables and routing. Not sure I can characterize the sound of the amp but I think the five 15 A drivers in the output stages drive my Aerial 10Ts pretty well :)

There you have it.

Tim
 
Thanks Tim. And upon further listening, my 2220 isn't exactly 'dead quiet' as I previously stated. There is a very slight hum that I must not have noticed before in the left channel. Is this the same channel yours had the hum in? Also a very slight hiss from both channels with no volume. I attribute this to the MosFet 'mist' that I hear a lot about. Feel free retort. I appreciate your input. Thank you much......John
 
Back
Top Bottom