Changers that work well for stacked 78's.

fondofmusic

Active Member
Hello all,

Off an on over the years I have collected vintage 78 albums, many of the 12 inch classical variety. Why is a good question but they have always fascinated me.

Obtaining a reliable turntable has always been my main problem but a few years ago due to the internet and groups like this one I was pointed in the direction of a couple turntables. My requirements were that it should be able to play all speeds well though quality amplifiers. That of course limited them to a rather short period of the late 50s to mid 60's for the most part.

The two I purchased ended up being the Elac H 50, a turntable I accidently stumbled on not even knowing what it was at a local action for a dollar.. The other I got though suggestions on the net from ebay, it being a Dual 1009. Both have fine sound. For some time I thought that the Elac cartridge was producing way too much surface noise and so I only tired it a few times as it had other issues as well. Recently however after having endless problems with the Dual 1009 not being able to change the records well took another look at the Elac. I have come to realize that the single spindle system, which granted it in hindsight not the best way to support a heavy stack of records has some real issues depending on design.. the dual was constantly refusing to drop records that had the slightest roughness to the center spindle hole due to the way the little arms have to move up and into that area to drop the records. Any bit of rough paper or damaged shellac would result in tipping of the stack knocking the arm off the platter and usually not changing the record. To my surprise when I finally got the nerve to clean up the Elac mechanism and give it another try, the spindle on it drops the straight down with little effort, sets I thought would not play automatically now do with ease. Only a really damaged center will cause it to fail to drop.. Bottom line is all designs are not the same and Elac seems to have won on the way they change the records.

I have however often thought that a changer that used the side support like a Garrard would be best suited for these type of albums. Trouble with that one is that I have acquired the 78 and LP stylus for both Dual and Elac and they each have fine cartridges. I rather hate to have to start over from that angle.

I am curious if others who would granted be a limited bunch probably on this site, have some changers they would suggest that fit the specifications of having all speeds and dependable changing systems. If nothing else I wanted to say that the Elac, (slight hum tendency and all) is by far the superior system for those who do collect and value early 78 speed albums.

Larry
 

Attachments

  • DSC05842.jpg
    DSC05842.jpg
    70.5 KB · Views: 22
  • DSC05843.jpg
    DSC05843.jpg
    89.8 KB · Views: 22
Register to hide this ad
Greetings and welcome!

I set up an Elac 40H specifically for stacking 78s. It works very well for that purpose but, as you mentioned, it is a bit noisy for use with LPs.

You can't go wrong with a properly set up Dual. A fine table for 78s and LPs.

And, I think you'll find more than a "limited bunch on this site" to offer suggestions. :thmbsp:

Cheers!

John
 
Last edited:
Excuse my ignorance, but are you concerned about 78's cracking when dropped down in the changer?
 
I was actually going to specifically suggest one of the Garrard A models, probably the Type A-II or the A70 as being the perfect thing for this. The side pusher is more gentle and won't drop the records as rapidly as a center drop spindle type will. Its also
somewhat less affected by a worn center hole.


A lot of the noise issues are stylus-dependant though, and often the LP stylus will track at a different weight than the 78 one does so there may be some amount of re-setup when changing record types. It may be you just need a different LP stylus thats a little less revealing. What cartridges and what stylus types are you using on the Elac ?
 
Wow.... you're a braver man than I.

I wouldn't dream of playing shellac 78s on a stacking changer. A number of used 78s I've acquired apparently have been played on changers as evidenced by wallowed-out spindle holes. Perhaps my fears are unfounded if one has the right changer that is 'gentle' on the records?
 
Excuse my ignorance, but are you concerned about 78's cracking when dropped down in the changer?

No, but I will say the Dual is much more problematic with a loud thump on the first record down. I attribute that to the 10" turn table an a very hard unforgiving rubber mat they used. The Elac is nearly quiet when it drops the first record. The issue is getting them to drop as the arm moves off the reject and not get hung up or tilt wildly and hit the arm causing it to end up either on the turntable as in 10" settings or off completely with the 12" records.. From my experience only near perfect records will change well with the Dual model I have.

Larry
 
I was actually going to specifically suggest one of the Garrard A models, probably the Type A-II or the A70 as being the perfect thing for this. The side pusher is more gentle and won't drop the records as rapidly as a center drop spindle type will. Its also
somewhat less affected by a worn center hole.


A lot of the noise issues are stylus-dependant though, and often the LP stylus will track at a different weight than the 78 one does so there may be some amount of re-setup when changing record types. It may be you just need a different LP stylus thats a little less revealing. What cartridges and what stylus types are you using on the Elac ?

The Elac has the original Elac Cartridge and I purchased from Germany original elac stylus.

Larry
 
Breakage is a concern. In my case, I'm afraid if I had to sit in front of the changer and change the record after each short play I wouldn't use it much so I take my chances. I've never had any break but may have second thoughts if that happens.

The OP however seems to be a more serious collector than me and may want to consider not stacking.
 
Wow.... you're a braver man than I.

I wouldn't dream of playing shellac 78s on a stacking changer. A number of used 78s I've acquired apparently have been played on changers as evidenced by wallowed-out spindle holes. Perhaps my fears are unfounded if one has the right changer that is 'gentle' on the records?

I know that many collectors do not use a stacking mechanism for 78s'. However I for a while tired to make do with that but endless trips to the changer to change the records of a from six to twelve side set was really not what I want to do when I want to enjoy hearing the records without constant attention. Many old 78 changers like some Zeniths and others in their day never seemed to have a problem, however as mentioned many records have been damaged especially from that center hole being pushed by a little internal arm that shoved them from their resting place. One thing going for the single spindle is that they are gentle on that center hole for sure, I have never had a 78 in 50 years break from simply dropping onto the turntable.
 
The issue is getting them to drop as the arm moves off the reject and not get hung up or tilt wildly and hit the arm causing it to end up either on the turntable as in 10" settings or off completely with the 12" records..

Larry

My Elac never fails to drop correctly. Do they tilt when sitting on the spindle before play or after they start cycling?
 
My Elac never fails to drop correctly. Do they tilt when sitting on the spindle before play or after they start cycling?

Sorry, wasn't exactly clear on that one, the Dual is the one that tilts them due to the small arms that move upward to try to close and allow the bottom record to fall. When those little arms meet resistance they tend to stall in their movement a bit allowing the whole stack to lean to one side or the other. The Elac uses a simpler smaller sized set of arms that move inward rather than upward so much as the dual does and so far it always just lets the bottom one come straight down, no tilting observed with it.

I am not sure of the reasoning that Elac used, but they state in their manual that their spindle is the gentlest on the records of any system at the time. It may have a slight break to the lower part of the fall that helps to slow them just as they reach the bottom but I am not sure on that. From some other automatic changers I have seen in operation nearly all of them fall at a pretty good clip. I think the saving thing is mostly the air cushion that may exist as they fall slowing them just a bit.
 
I think I'd have to agree on the 50H; it was the very last changer I ever owned before being seduced by the Japanese single-play turntables. After going through perhaps 4 or 5 Garrards and a Dual or two, the Miracord was the best changer I ever owned - although by that point I was using it more as a manual. A very nice piece of equipment, and very much under the radar for most people.
 
I stack 78s on my BSR changers pretty often. They do a surprisingly good job for what they are, and I've never had a record crack or shatter. I've stacked as many as 6 at a time. The suspension seems to absorb most of the energy from the drop.
 
Thorens TDW-224. The only gentle one I know of for 78 RPM discs that I feel comfortable with. Especially those laminated 1940's era Columbia.
 
Other than the changers that pick up the record and place it, much like a person would by hand, the Garrard pusher platform models are the safest and gentlest. The Dual 12 series and Miracord spindles are unnecessarily harsh to the center holes with their metal "fingers" to hold the stack up while the bottom record drops. I have seen the Duals crack center holes. The Dual 10 series spindles have the notorious rubber "fingers" that go bad with age and drop the whole stack. Garrard's Lab 80 had the gentlest of the "tripoise" spindles but the Lab 80 turntable was 33/45 only.

Anything with a "pusher" built into the spindle is also excessively harsh.

The best of the Garrard pusher platform units were the A70 and the nearly-identical 70 Mk II. The Type A was next-best. However if you are using the General Electric VR-II cartridge in its turnaround version, the Type A accommodates the turnaround knob; the A70 and 70 Mk II do not, unless you want to drill their magnesium headshell.
A foam mat on the platter makes for a soft landing of the first record.

Light tracking capability of the tonearm is a nonissue for 78rpm records. ANY modern tonearm, including anything on a component-grade automatic from 1960 or so, is good enough.

I'm among those who bought the Shure VN78E 78rpm stylus for my V-15 Type III, many years ago. It has turned out to be nearly useless; it tracks TOO light to handle the very quick, small warps on many 78rpm records.

The original poster in this thread wrote, "Off an on over the years I have collected vintage 78 albums, many of the 12 inch classical variety. Why is a good question but they have always fascinated me." Much classical music was performed differently in the 78rpm era; for example many of the musicians had teachers who had known such composers as Brahms and Wagner personally. Some had been taught by Mahler. The "WHY" may well be because of a performance tradition that no longer exists.

Sound quality is not everything; in fact without the music, it is nothing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom