• Please note that there are a few updates and clarifications made in the Audiokarma Rules, mostly relating to advertising and the addition of the new "Paying it Forward" & "Giving back" forums in the AudioKarma Audio Marketplace section.

Did I save these Dynaco A50s or destroy them? Forum vote

saabracer23

Super Member
Did I save these or did I kill them?

So, my father brought home a pair of mis matched Dynaco A50s and they were in pretty poor shape. One speaker had the seas woofers and the tweeter mounted above the woofers and the other speaker had peerless woofers with the tweeter mounted below the woofers. The original tweeters were gone and replaced with some cheapo Philips drivers. My father mentioned how odd it was that they would mount a tweeter above the woofer and at a different time mount them below. This led the conversation into a direction of mirror imaging talk. He said that he had never seen a pair mirror imaged and that I should make them mirror imaged. Well they're his speakers so why not, I'll do it.

First thing I had to do was source the right tweeters. So I looked everywhere and found a pair of A30 tweeters which I guess were the ones used in the A50. I wanted to find two more SEAS drivers so I had a total of four and then sell off the peerless. Finding two SEAS woofers in 15 ohm was going to be near impossible so I decided to use one of each driver in each cabinet so they looked the same at least. I ordered new poly caps (I really like the Audyn caps from PE as they are about the same price as the Daytons and I think they're better) and my father wanted to replace the potentiometer made up of small resistors with a more modern one so I got one of those too.

I pulled off both front baffles and noticed that the board that goes through the cabinet that acts as the aperiodic vent, runs differently in each cabinet. In one the board runs straight across, parallel to the top and bottom and in the other cabinet it runs diagonally at about 22 degrees. So I had to make the, the same.

I apologize, I didn't take a ton of pics.





So I cut out the board that went straight across and made a new one that you can see here using plywood. I cut the vent using the same position and dimensions as the old one.



Here is the new crossover, every component is brand new. One of the old coils was pretty much destroyed so I measured the good one with my ESR meter and so I ordered two. I wish I had done a better job with the layout. If I could do it over I would have laid it out neatly on 1/4" ply and made all of the connections on the under side where they wouldn't have been seen. I was in a hurry though. Oh well, they won't be seen anyways, unless the cabinet is taken apart.



One thing I forgot to mention was that the cabinets were very scratched up. I sanded them down completely to the bare veneer and then stained them and finished them with poly. I don't have any of the cabs before so you'll have to take my word for it I guess. The cabinets turned out quite nice though!

Next was to remake the baffles. I wanted to flush mount all of the drivers. In the originals they counter sunk all of the drivers by quite a bit and I wanted to make them just flush.



They came out pretty flush don't you think?



I stuffed both cabinets with that ultra touch denim insulation. I love that stuff. If you have the room to keep a bag of that stuff it is quite the buy. It was on sale and I was able to purchase enough to do at least 20 pair of these speakers for $40. I also painted the baffles black after sealing the MDF.







Next was to mount the drivers and listen!





As you can see in the pic the cabinets aren't perfect but I did the best I could. They really do sound good. After all of the work was done I was told that they were mine!!! So I think I may have one of the few mirror imaged pair around.

So my question to you fine folks, did I save these or did I completely ruin them? They look better as they are, but would it have been better to have left them as they were as they are somewhat rare? Put it to a vote as I'm really curious as to what others would have done.

Dan
 
Register to hide this ad
I think you did a great job and would like to see a grill cloth on them. As much as I like Dynaco speakers, I don't consider them like a vintage Corvette where all numbers need to match for the best price. How they sound to you is what is important, I bet they are cool!

Congrats on a job well done!
 
Really nice work. If I have it right, you replaced everything except the 4 sides of the cabinet, one interior board and the back.

If that is right, he should locate a brown knob of a Marantz 7 and let you go to town with it.
 
almost bought a pair of A50s at a great price way back in day from a mail order outfit that only lasted for one catalog in '74 i think. when i had saved the money to get them...the place had folded and was gone.

i moved on and missed my chance. the non-mirror imaged thing really kinda bugged me though, but bet they sounded great anyway.

terrific job you've done on those! keep us posted.
 
From start to finish, a major improvement! Your wood working skill are to be commended! Look forward to seeing the grills finished and installed.

Glenn
 
Looks like the engineers were in these deeply enough to come up with specific "tunings" for the resonant cavity for both the Peerless and Seas woofers. Obviously, differing volumes were used for the respective woofer used.

I would not have mixed up the woofers. Tandem woofers only realize their true benefits when their operating parameters are closely matched.

Great job on the appearance/cosmetics. I'm just pretty certain that a good bit of the engineer's magic of the design has been un-done. Just my .02 y'all understand.
 
Thanks for the kind words everyone! Boetie427ss I understand your concerns. Even though one board was straight across and one was diagonal they both actually had identical volumes. When I say identical, I mean identical. I put my math skills to use and so it was. After I took out the board that went straight across and replaced it with one that was diagonal, they crossed directly in their centers proving the fact that they were the same. The fact that Dynaco used the same cabinet volume and same crossover said to me that the woofers were built using the same t/s parameters. I really should get a DATS setup and run them all through.

Anyways, I wouldn't have combined the woofers if I had thought they were different from each other in ways other than appearance. I'm thinking one was diagonal was because the SEAS driver has a bigger frame and so it had to be placed in the cabinet differently.

Dan
 
great job! i found a pair of A50s once long ago at Salvation Army but didn't know what they were and let 'em go. i think you saved these.
 
Sure, with non-matching woofers in each cabinet and a revised crossover these are no longer fully authentic A-50's, but I really like what the OP has done here in his restoration and/or reclamation efforts. Nice veneer restoration, mirrored black baffles with flush drivers, excellent crossover components, fine work all around.

I happen to still have Dynaco literature from the early and mid 70's, and I found these two pics of the A-50. The first pic shows the A-50 with the tweet below the woofs - - dated 1975 from Dynaco of Canada. The second pic has the tweet above the woofs - - dated 1977 from Dynaco New Jersey address. This later version specified a slightly higher (30 watts) minimum power recommendation as compared to the earlier (25 watts). And yes, the literature explicitly states that the A-50 and the A-35 (not A-30 as you noted) do employ identical 1-1/2" tweeters and "similar" woofers.

In discussing the aperiodic speaker systems, the literature states that "the sonic balance of the A-50 tends to favor the middle low bass range, and emulates the sound quality of one of the most expensive and widely regarded compact speakers." Being Dynaco's largest consumer speaker, I suspect they were trying to capture some of the market dominated by the AR-3a. In 1972, according to Dynaco literature with the original Philadelphia address, the A-50 had a sale price of $179.95 in the east ($5 more in the west). The A-50 was the only model that did not have integral concealed hangers for wall mounting, but an optional 8" high stand was offered at $7.95 each.

I would have liked to see a few more pics of the "before" condition: differences in the woofers, close-up of crossover, front of both baffle boards ..... that sort of thing. If possible, report back on the tweeter L-pad performance and values for the caps and coil. For grille fabric, I hope you'll be using something close to the original "beige linen" grille cloth.

edit: Oh yeah, I really like that cotton batting, too!
 

Attachments

  • dynaco 75.jpg
    dynaco 75.jpg
    87.3 KB · Views: 158
  • dynaco 77.jpg
    dynaco 77.jpg
    99.8 KB · Views: 161
Even though one board was straight across and one was diagonal they both actually had identical volumes. When I say identical, I mean identical.
This is good to know, and makes much of my previous post moot. Also, your comments regarding the woofers similarity make good sense.

I like that you chose the angled partition, certainly the more difficult path. But, also the more academic path. :thmbsp:
 
Yes they were A35s not A30s. It was really late last night when I was typing. Also the other woofers are Scanspeaks not peerless.
 
I wish someone could teach me how to destroy something that thoroughly.

Haha nice comment! I appreciate the honesty. I can teach you if you'd like, any time! The other option was to leave them completely alone and have two different looking, yet same sounding speakers. Is that what you would have done?

Thanks,
Dan
 
Back
Top Bottom