Thank you for your post. I've never seen a 10b in the flesh, just pics, so I found it very interesting indeed. Didn't realize its selectivity was so good. My tuners are all digital now, and I miss the tuning knob. Great job, great post.
The 10B, because of its unique linear phase filters, has the ability to separate stations close together on the dial with minimal IM distortion. I've owned tuners with wide and narrow filters, and they provide good selectivity in the narrow position at the expense of fidelity. IM distortion rises sharply when using conventional ceramic narrow filters.
The beauty of the 10B is that it is able to give you low IM distortion, phase integrity and high selectivity at the same time.
Another treat of the Marantz is the quasi-vestigial sideband MPX decoder that maintains full separation even with marginal signals. With a conventional tuner you often experience flickering of the stereo indicator with such DX signals. And if you do have stable stereo, the image is often compressed and an auto blending circuit might come on, affecting separation.
With the 10B, you can manually apply hi-blend. But even without it, many fringe stations come in quite listenable.
The Marantz 10B was a tour-de-force in FM engineering back in the day. The development cost was $250,000 in early 1960s dollars. It pretty much put the company near bankruptcy. But then, the goal was to produce the finest tuner available. And to me, they succeded!
I'm glad you liked the video and this humble thread of mine. All the best in the New Year!