Fisher- List Reasons of Superior Design

sony6060

Super Member
Banned
It is no secret I like Fisher stereo tube products. Fisher built a superior product. My focus leans towards the receivers, but also includes the amplifiers. If I missed a few design attributes, please add your comments.

Front Panel-
The 400/500/800 series uses an aluminum anodized champagne color panel of timeless appearance. The receiver dial is a gorgeous and artful multi-color design plus the silk screen print stays intact over time. The tuning eye tube is beautiful and the later models meters rarely fail over time. I never experienced a failure. The receivers and amplifiers simply blends in well to any décor and Fisher avoided that cheap 'kit' like unfinished appearance.

Small Components-
The quality of components holds up well over time. I rarely find a resistor out of specification and some of the resistors appear to be epoxy coated. Unlike some vintage products from Asia, few coupling capacitors have excessive leakage over the years. Fisher also used expensive German manufactured ERO FOL II capacitors in strategic locations for a great sonic signature.

Audio Transformers-
No cost cutting here. Fisher uses large audio transformers for excellent response across the audio range. Some other manufactures made use of cheap open frame mini sized audio transformers. In todays value small audio transformers are a $20 item and the modern equivalent audio transformers of the Fisher grade are at least $120 each.

Power Transformer-
Fisher did not cut costs with installing a barely adequate power transformer.

DC Filaments-
Fisher makes use of DC filaments in the phono, input amp and tone amp sections to remove AC filament induced hum. Most other manufactures skipped this important attribute.

Wiring Layout-
Fisher used shielded wire at critical areas to remove induced AC hum. The wiring layout is neat and providing service on most Fisher products is simple due to the careful wiring and component layout. The tube products are hard wired, no cost cutting printed circuit boards to fail when under the stress of multiple heat cycles from the tubes.

FM Tuner-
Careful design of the FM tuner section provided good frequency accuracy across the dial. I never experienced a Fisher tuner drifting off frequency during warm up too. The RF front-end is very sensitive (holds up to modern standards) and the many multiple LC type IF sections provides excellent selectivity & an excellent sonic signature. The FM stereo multiplexer is well known as a superior design. Some other vintage products cut costs in the FM tuner section with a minimal design.

Phase Splitter-
The simple cathodyne type phase splitter is inherently well balanced by the design itself. And, Fisher provided potentiometers to fine tune the audio output as seen on an oscilloscope. Fixed resistors do not allow fine tuning. Use of a 12AX7 did account for excessive miller capacitance influence, however I find the overall sonic response to sound extremely pleasing as is. And, a multitude of 12AX7s exist to tune the sound to ones desires.

Phono Section-
Some say the phono amp is inferior to other era phono amps. I do not get it! Many other designs are almost identical using the 12AX7 tubes. Fisher low end roll off? Personally, I do not need a -1dB response to 25Hz. The Fisher phono stage is as quiet as any due to DC filaments & careful location in the chassis. Even the tube sockets are installed with isolation grommets. (Time to replace the grommets though). Want a world class sounding Fisher phono section? Upgrade the coupling capacitors & tubes. Others with impeccable background in the audio & entertainment industry will verify the upgraded Fisher phono section performance. They do not require a $1K outboard phono preamp.

Conclusion
I consider the Fisher products a bargain price wise and on par with the best vintage designs from an engineering view. Thanks to the large production numbers, the Fisher receivers and amplifiers are not $1500 items in unrestored condition.
 
Register to hide this ad
I agree with everything you stated, Sony6060. I know the complete history of my 800B since it was purchased in 1963 and it has held up extremely well all those years. Given the fact that none of the tubes were EVER changed and the unit was played until the power tubes were simply too weak to put anything out, it is amazing how well it sounds now.

The component placement and wire routing made working on the amp very easy. I found many of the capacitors I replaced were still in spec (but I replaced them anyway, especially the electrolytics.)

Those mid-century Fishers were high quality units!
 
my 1st experience with Fisher stuff is with my X-100-B intg. amp.
Layout of everything has been well thought out. things just seem to belong where they are.
Wireing is neat and routed carefully as apprppriate.
Each section of amplification is well defined and in it's own place and can be identified easily once you get the layout .
They look very good up front. kind of 'elegant' IMO.
Good stuff.
 
Last edited:
Aside from the things that attract me to Fishers, like the component quality and repairability, there's one key feature that was groundbreaking and set their gear apart.

The user interface.

Ever try and connect the speakers and then turn on an Eico Stereo 40?
 
I'm very impressed with my Fisher line up, X-101-C, TA-600, and 500-C. It will be interesting to see how my other brands stack up once they are restored. I have a Scott, Harmon Kardon, and Bogen to test against the Fishers down the road. I guess it will be a tube shootout! :thmbsp:
 
I have certainly become a fan since getting my 400 rebuilt and in operation. Sounds awfully good through a bookshelf pair of Tannoys. :yes:
 
Ive been a Fisher fan since the mid 60s with my parents Fisher console. I know i was going to be a hands on man back then i figured out a way to hook up my car 8 track player to the console battery charger and all for power.

Now that ive gone through the spectrum of audio gear ive settled down and went back in time. Fisher 400c pre and 200a monos going with my modern speakers and turntable. A match that none of the modern gear i went through can touch audibly.

While rebuilding my Fisher gear i was impressed with all thats mentioned above especially the phono section of my 400c. While rebuilding the EQ which means removing it from the chassis. I rebuilt it by installing 4 phono inputs and thats a feature im glad i went with.
 
My only gripe with the Fisher units is the steel chassis. The aluminum chassis on comparably rated HHScott units clean up better.
 
Back
Top Bottom