is the 4000 XL inductance like the 4000D or closer to the 2000 series?
Odd that you should ask. Not the later style illustrated here with the flip-down stylus guard, no, but the earlier style without the flipper, yes. It can be a tight fit, in my experience. Don't force anything. This is assuming you can even find an earlier-style 4000D stylus. You might have better luck with the 440D stylus, which I've only seen in the earlier form.Have a dumb question;any chance of it fitting on an RM-50?
Okay, everybody sing:Doug G said:Except, what's that little blue thing in there?
Regardless of whether MacNoob's 4000XLIII is typical or not, the S912E is wrong for it,
Odd that you should ask. Not the later style illustrated here with the flip-down stylus guard, no, but the earlier style without the flipper, yes. It can be a tight fit, in my experience. Don't force anything. This is assuming you can even find an earlier-style 4000D stylus. You might have better luck with the 440D stylus, which I've only seen in the earlier form.
The RM-50 is a 350mH body, and the original 4000D styli are meant for a body down around 250mH, but for stereo use this is close enough.

I wouldn't recommend this as an everyday swap. Tolerances could easily line up such that insertion would be impossible, but it works. I've done this and there are photos on the interwebb of others frankencarting it up. Just know that there's a risk involved-- might be so tight you couldn't get it out again.Doug G said:...I thought that, because the metal shank sticks out so much farther than the plastic one on the chunky styli, it wouldn't insert far enough. On the other hand, I do remember conversation to the effect that a 2000 type stylus would work in a chunky body...