I'm shopping for a new 2 channel recevier. Not much out there, is there?

I have been looking for my Brother who wants to replace a older integrated with a new one. He to is on a tight budget. I've also recommended Denon/Marantz and Yamaha. He lives nearby a Crutchfield retailer. I told him to go and listen to them before he decides.

His Birthday is this month and I plan on getting him a Crutchfield gift card.
 
The old Yammies I've heard sounded fine and offered many features for the cost. However, my son has that Cambridge ARX100 you listed and we think it sounds quite good. The internal heat sinks look adequate plus a variable speed fan kicks in only when needed - which is at elevated levels when the fan is inaudible. It appears to be designed for reliable use at high outputs. He's got a sub connected and actually uses the FM tuner. The ARX looks better built than my similar 75wpc Marantz receiver, who's heat sinks are undersized for rockin'.
 
I have the Yamaha R-N303 at my beach house. I've got a nice, older Yamaha CD player connected and also use Bluetooth to stream Spotify from my iPhone. Speakers are KEF Q150 bookshelf speakers on stands. They list for $599 but often go on sale for $399 or $299. I really love the KEF sound, speaking as a former B&W fan (still have 2 sets).

The Yamaha R-N303 has excellent sound and at 100 wpc has no problem driving the KEFs loud if I so desire. Well-built with plenty of punch. NOT strident or harsh. As sweet as my Modwright tube pre>Krell amp combo? No. But at a fraction of the price, the Yamaha is a great unit that does nothing wrong and I simply enjoy the music when I am using it.
 
New Emotiva Basx100 integrated with Built in DAC , Phono stage , FM tuner and all metal case is already very good sounding 2x60 or 2x90 into 4ohm despite Emotivas usual crapy capacitors and resistors used , so it could sound even better with proper audio caps and parts .
Not sure if are willing to mod it but this Emotiva has solid potential for 399usd plus 100usd in much better parts and some time to swap some parts ..... result could compete with many 1000 to 2000usd amps...
 
New Emotiva Basx100 integrated with Built in DAC , Phono stage , FM tuner and all metal case is already very good sounding 2x60 or 2x90 into 4ohm despite Emotivas usual crapy capacitors and resistors used , so it could sound even better with proper audio caps and parts .
Not sure if are willing to mod it but this Emotiva has solid potential for 399usd plus 100usd in much better parts and some time to swap some parts ..... result could compete with many 1000 to 2000usd amps...

That would be the TA-100; I had one. Good value, but no fixed out for a tape deck made it teats-on-a-bull for my bedroom. Plus, I found the brand's pale thin display digits (even with top models) too dim to read - and using with their oddball-logic remote control requires some feedback from the display. I might well still own some of their units if they had legible skin. That criticism aside, the sound quality was fine enough. And most people don't use tape decks, obviously.

Couple my poor vision and handicaps for getting up and down a lot, then Emotiva doesn't exactly fill the bill. In case the OP has similar concerns, I mention this. But warning to all: Remote Control can become very important to you over time.

The little A-100 "Flex Amp" is also a good-sounding amp, and it has no display for it needs none. Input, VC, Output. I think it may share amps with the TA-100, but that's merely speculation. One on the front porch, one on the back patio and I jack in my Zune player or Sangean pocket radio.

I've been saying it for years. Give me a display I can read across a room, even OSD would be acceptable - preferable if done well. Why is it you can spend $12 or less on a clock radio with a large display, but if you want to read an electronic menu, you have to pony up bigtime, with McIntosh or similar?

That jes' don' make no sense.

Now, is the OP still shopping, or did I miss a purchase while scanning?

Emotiva, you say? Fine choice, fine...
 
Why is it you can spend $12 or less on a clock radio with a large display, but if you want to read an electronic menu, you have to pony up bigtime, with McIntosh or similar?

That jes' don' make no sense.

Ain't that the truth!
Some of these units should change the description of their display dimming options from Off-Dim-Bright, to Off-Darned near off-Still unreadable at ten feet away.
Oddly enough, some of the cheaper units actually do a better job with their displays than some of the medium to higher priced units.
 
The old Yammies I've heard sounded fine and offered many features for the cost. However, my son has that Cambridge ARX100 you listed and we think it sounds quite good. The internal heat sinks look adequate plus a variable speed fan kicks in only when needed - which is at elevated levels when the fan is inaudible. It appears to be designed for reliable use at high outputs. He's got a sub connected and actually uses the FM tuner. The ARX looks better built than my similar 75wpc Marantz receiver, who's heat sinks are undersized for rockin'.


A fair amount of used Yamaha "Aventage" series available out there. Canuck Audio Mart for one...$140 Amer (Sa-RX 740)...or offers online for $200-$300 range for related models.

Have had the RX740 for five years now without a hitch.

Q
 
Last edited:
My Yamaha A-S500 is driving Monitor Audio floor-standers of recent vintage (rather petite model Silver 6) - and the sound quality is very good indeed. Addictive even. The Yamaha receiver amp sections, unfortunately, are not the same amps as their integrated models with a tuner added as some suppose and reasonably so, as it was done more often in the past - NAD certainly did. I believe the OP would love an A-S501 driving his Klipsch. Or step up a little closer to that grand for a 701 or 801. Nice.

While tube amplification is quite beguiling, I'm more the lock-and-key sort. A good solid state amp requires no maintenance to speak of, and less trouble-shooting is good for my soul. Never was a tube-roller, either. Just finding a matched quad for a custom ST-70 that actually all glowed properly proved to be enough tube-rolling for me. Gimme transistors, please. I prefer listening to music over repairing, replacing, or fiddling with gear, though I do like the remote control fiddle.

So, I wouldn't know what tube integrated amp to recommend and will leave that for those smarter about it. My experience suggests that a grand may not get me all I want from tubes. Best tube gear I ever heard always came with an Audio Research Corporation logo, and big tickets.

For solid state at under a grand I like Yamaha because the company has an excellent track record of building high quality at reasonable cost because they can sell more units than many brands. Want a really good acoustic guitar? A three-to-four-hundred-dollar Yamaha will provide a professional sound quality. They make wonderful pianos, too. I know those Yamaha guitars are hard to beat for the price. I own two now, and still pick one up now and again... they sound great, really good tone. And use some build techniques usually found at a higher price. And they sell a lot of them. The more units that sell, the lower the price can get.

Of course, they have a long history in audio, too. Some fine gear over the years. They still have the advantage of selling more than most audio brands, and they've always been above average with quality control. I believe their technical experience and long history of good, reliable product makes them hard to beat for affordable integrated amps, too. When it comes to the A-S1100 at $2500, I'm looking elsewhere, but near or under a kilobuck I put 'em on the shortlist.

I like Cambridge Audio, too. But I don't believe they are built better than the Yamaha int-amps priced near them, or maybe even under. However, I've not heard the Cambridge int-amps, so can't comment on their sound quality. Do have a little receiver Cambridge that I enjoy sometimes.

I'd also check out Marantz at the price. Used to swear by NAD until I bought their $1k preamps 160, then 162 and both quit after a few months of warranty expiration. Same problem, failed logic circuitry, which was almost guaranteed to recur (from my 100% failure rate perspective) - to fail again. When they failed under warranty, the manual (and the Company) treated the subject as normal, instructing to leave it unplugged for a specified amount of time, plug power cord back in and it is reset. And it is, the first twenty or so times you have to go through this, but then it relieves your stress by refusing to work at all; two weeks after the warranty expires so does the product. An experience that weakened my faith in the company. I once owned nothing but.

I have considered replacing my A-S500 with a CXA-81, but the sound is so good now to me that I have trouble believing I'd hear any difference. If I try one, it will be easily returnable. However, I just keep losing that need-it-feeling whenever I listen back there.

Of course, the A-S500 was considered by many to be the sweet spot in the line. I don't know how well the current A-S501 compares with it - could be even better, for all I know. Picked mine up from an AKer who asked $200 a few years ago, intending to upgrade pretty soon after. I found an amp I love for $200? Yep. Now I know others here have felt that way many times, but this is the closest I ever came to a scroe (I hate that word).

Now, I really never was a Yamaha fanboy in the past (what's that Natural Sound mean anyway?), but they've been able to keep the doors open when so many others couldn't that they wore me down, I guess.
 
I also have become a Yamaha user and they are very reliable. I also am limited in my ability to get around. Being able to see the display is a plus. My latest system in my study are a Yamaha RS 201 in my study coupled to a Grace internet tuner, Bluetooth input, a Sony XD tuner ( nice display) , a Denon DP300f automatic turntable using the built -in preamp. BS-RS22 Pioneer speakers.

I control the station Choices on the RS201 with my iPad and my iMac via Bluetooth. The Sony with it’s own remote, also the Grace.

My living room system is the Yamaha RN 402 powering a pair of KEF Q300 speakers using the iPad to control everything.

Musichal is right. For us movement challenged folks, a good display and remote really helps.
 
Last edited:
For you guys using the lower priced Yamahas (say the A-S301 or R-N303 or even the R-S202), how much sound degradation to you hear when feeding them FLAC or MP3 files by Bluetooth? The Bluetooth would be received by a simple Logitech dongle plugged into one of the Yamaha's RCA inputs, fed by either my laptop or a Samsung Tab 4 tablet.

I've been spoiled by my Onkyo TX-8050's front USB input, which I use to listen to those FLAC and MP3's, but I'm curious about using a Yamaha with the Bluetooth setup just described. One of the great things about that USB is the navigation. It shows the Artist/Album/Song Title right on the Onkyo's display, so it makes selection very easy.
 
IME with the Yamaha receiver in my bedroom. The quality of the file being played is the determining factor for audio quality. Although I could use Bluetooth I don't, because I'm not sure I have AptX on everything. Besides, I can and do always use the USB input on the front of the receiver.
 
The little A-100 "Flex Amp" is also a good-sounding amp, and it has no display for it needs none.
I use one for the office/around house system sourced by a MacMini that provides access to my digital library, Qobuz, SiriusXM and internet radio. It lives inside a cabinet so it remains out of sight. Nice unit.
 
He will be disappointed in the tuner. No company makes a receiver with a good one.
 
My husband and I recently purchased a Sony STR-DH190 for my father-in-law as a birthday gift. It was around $120 at Best Buy. I was really surprised. This relatively cheap two-channel receiver, complete with a 2-year warranty and remote control, certainly does not sound cheap. In fact, it is quite musical and dynamic. He is using it with a pair of Polk R50 speakers. These speakers are, well lets not mince words: HORRIBLE. Yet, the Sony drives them effortlessly and very dynamically. It is well worth a look.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom