I picked up that M-60 on CL which cleaned up fine and now my brother has it combined with a C-80 and T-80. Really great combination for the money.
I spend some time with the M-60 in my own system before he picked it up. I was generally impressed with its performance. The high frequencies tend to have a little more air to them, maybe a little more delicacy to some instruments as compared to my M-2.
The M-2 has much more authority, a more forward mid range, and with warmer high frequencies.
My brother gave me a well used M-4 in trade he had recently picked up. It was horribly dirty inside, but with some work it cleaned up quite nicely. All the setting were off but adjusted to specification just fine.
For the last couple of nights I have been listening to it in my system. This is a fine sounding amp! What a sleeper. I've heard some of you state you like the M-4 sound better than the M-2. I've got to spend some more time comparing, but I think you might be right. Granted the M-2 has more authority but the mids and highs may be more balanced on the M-4?
I spend some time with the M-60 in my own system before he picked it up. I was generally impressed with its performance. The high frequencies tend to have a little more air to them, maybe a little more delicacy to some instruments as compared to my M-2.
The M-2 has much more authority, a more forward mid range, and with warmer high frequencies.
My brother gave me a well used M-4 in trade he had recently picked up. It was horribly dirty inside, but with some work it cleaned up quite nicely. All the setting were off but adjusted to specification just fine.
For the last couple of nights I have been listening to it in my system. This is a fine sounding amp! What a sleeper. I've heard some of you state you like the M-4 sound better than the M-2. I've got to spend some more time comparing, but I think you might be right. Granted the M-2 has more authority but the mids and highs may be more balanced on the M-4?