Marantz 2245 vs ???

shashvat

Member
I'm looking to buy an integrated amplifier and am willing to consider both vintage and new equipment.

The record shop down the road has a restored Marantz 2245b and the sticker on that is $600. I see similar prices online as well.

I've never heard vintage Marantz receivers but have heard a lot about their desirability.

My question is - how does a well restored vintage Marantz amp from the 22xx series compare against something new, like a Marantz PM6004 or Yamaha A-S500?
 
Register to hide this ad
I think the first thing that I would ask about the 2245 would be what was done as far as being "restored". If it was restored, at a minimum, it should have had electrolytic caps replaced, output transistors checked and or replaced, and some resoldering of boards as needed. This would also include things involved in "servicing", such as replacing lamps, vellum paper, cleaning, and adjustments as per service manual.
 
I think the first thing that I would ask about the 2245 would be what was done as far as being "restored".

For the purposes of this thread, let's assume that any Marantz 22xx vintage amp being discussed has been restored in all the points you mentioned.
 
I'm looking to buy an integrated amplifier and am willing to consider both vintage and new equipment.

The record shop down the road has a restored Marantz 2245b and the sticker on that is $600. I see similar prices online as well.

I've never heard vintage Marantz receivers but have heard a lot about their desirability.

My question is - how does a well restored vintage Marantz amp from the 22xx series compare against something new, like a Marantz PM6004 or Yamaha A-S500?

For the purposes of this thread, let's assume that any Marantz 22xx vintage amp being discussed has been restored in all the points you mentioned.

Sound wise a vintage Marantz should sound better, if it still meets original performance specs.
Properly maintained and "restored" the amplifier stages should be as reliable as a brand new unit. The AM/FM tuner sections have some parts, electrical and mechanical, that could give unrepairable issues though. But, if any component fails, due to abuse, excessive heat, dormant component fault, it is conceiveable that parts will not be available for repair. Or you may have to pay more for the part to source it from a salvage unit &/or pay for the labor involved to retrieve said component.
These were not engineered to "last forever". There can be issues caused by the heat from those incandescent lamps. The tuner front-end capacitors are prone to corrosion in nearly unreachable areas. Some of the power amps are barely stable and don't take well to temperature extremes. Some of the components are compromised by nearby heat or their own generated heat. Some of the internal potentiometers are such poor quality that heat, time, and dust makes it difficlult to "align" amp and rf/if stages.
All that being said, you have the same, or similar issues, with modern mid-fi equipment.
I have a pretty good collection of most of the 22XX series and love the sound of each one but do not consider the $ value more than say 50% of the cost of a present day unit.
For the cost, the technology was good, the sound quality was better, but the cost of maintaining these old boat anchors is high, unless you do it yourself.
To put the Marantz product line in the same reference as automobiles, Marantz was the Dodge of that era. McIntosh, on the otherhand, is the Rolls Royce.
 
I bought a new Marantz PM8003 a couple of years ago. I'm very happy with it. I also have a few vintage receivers: Pioneer SX950, Marantz 2235, Pioneer SX780, Sony STR5800... None of my vintage equip is "restored" but I have rebuilt the power supply section of the Marantz. All in all, I'd say you'll be hard pressed to hear any difference in a quality built new amp and a vintage amp. If your hearing is exceptional and you have a keen ear, there might be a difference.
As much as I love my vintage equipment, I think for reliability and at least equal sound quality, a well built new amp is the way to go.
YMMV,
Mike
 
...
My question is - how does a well restored vintage Marantz amp from the 22xx series compare against something new, like a Marantz PM6004 or Yamaha A-S500?

I have a Yamaha R-S500 as well as a Marantz 2245 and a 2220B. Neither Marantz has been fully restored.. I prefer the sound of either Marantz to that of the RS-500.

The remote volume control is one reason I'm keeping the Yamaha. I now use the R-S500 to listen to cable radio.

One of my music sources is an mp3 player with an equalizer and a volume control. I hook that to the Marantzs with a long cord and a line level booster. That gets around the lack of a remote volume control on the vintage receivers for one music source.
 
Last edited:
I'm looking to buy an integrated amplifier and am willing to consider both vintage and new equipment.

The record shop down the road has a restored Marantz 2245b and the sticker on that is $600. I see similar prices online as well.

I've never heard vintage Marantz receivers but have heard a lot about their desirability.

My question is - how does a well restored vintage Marantz amp from the 22xx series compare against something new, like a Marantz PM6004 or Yamaha A-S500?

You might want to check on the model number of the Marantz, since they never made a 2245B. If it is a model 2245, $600.00 seems high to me.

Comparing a 2245 to the PM6004 is a fair contest and while the PM6004 may edge out the 2245 because of its newness, it doesn't have the cool factor of a vintage receiver.

Comparing the Yamaha to the Marantz seems like a mismatch due to the Yamaha's output which is almost double the Marantz
 
I have a modern lower mid-range unit in an Onkyo AVR. I love the thing and use it a lot for background "house cleaning" music in 5.1, and theater in 7.1. (It stops there.) I guess the better new stuff needs to take no back seat to ANY vintage gear.....my humble Onkyo NR-609 does in 2 channel to the point of it being ridiculous....it conquers in theater and connectivity. For me it will always be about AND. No way in heck do I want to choose either/or. (Like jstang said...it's a good savings account with silver.)
 
2245 is a great sounding receiver but I'd only pay about half that for one and that's a stretch. I think you my have the model number wrong.
 
My son has a 2245, I have a 2270 and a 2220, for $600. I would be looking for a 2270.
No point in comparing to any other brand as arguments always ensue.
If you want full control of your 22xx series, put an airport express on it and you can control music selection, volume, select radio from online from a smartphone or ipod Not perfect but still a good way to work your Marantz, about $100.00.
The 2245 will run most speakers admirably, I'm impressed by my son's set up with the paradigms.
If you have $600.00 and the unit is proven as previously stated by others to have had a complete restoration, sure, otherwise I think that's high.
 
Last edited:
2245 is a great sounding receiver but I'd only pay about half that for one and that's a stretch. I think you my have the model number wrong.

Ditto. $600 for a 2245 is way, way out of line, IMHO. I paid $150 for mine, unrestored, champagne engraved. A fellow AKer near me paid the same for a near mint unit, also champagne. Beyond price, it's the best sounding Marantz receiver I've ever heard.
 
Wading through offerings that price things as though they have had extensive servicing and don't....sucks. It does influence real world pricing and that has to always be kept in mind. (Just the facts Bob.)
 
Looking at all the replies looks like I should hold off on buying a new amp till I've heard a few 22XXs.

While a new amp has its virtues - hassle free, support and mod cons like a remote - there seem to be enough people here who prefer the sound of a vintage Marantz over comparable modern offerings.

Time to continue research.

Thanks all for your replies.
 
Looking at all the replies looks like I should hold off on buying a new amp till I've heard a few 22XXs.

While a new amp has its virtues - hassle free, support and mod cons like a remote - there seem to be enough people here who prefer the sound of a vintage Marantz over comparable modern offerings.

Time to continue research.

Thanks all for your replies.

While you're right to do some more research before buying; listening to a few 22XXs receivers isn't likely to yield much RELIABLE INFORMATION.
I'll explain... The problem is, you have no way of knowing the genuine condition of those few receivers you may have a chance to audition, never mind the differences you will hear due to the different speakers and room acoustics. While extended listening is, no doubt, the final criterion when judging new equipment, where the rest of the system can often be controlled. The variations when trying to audition used equipment make a final buying decision very difficult, and are often misleading. Again, the real wildcard is the condition of the receiver itself. Even if it was refurbished, the completeness of the job AND the QUALITY of the replacement components will make a huge difference in the resulting sonic qualities of the receiver in question.
My advice...
look at a lot of Marantz receivers. They essentually come in three groupings:
1971~76: the 2230, 2245, 2270,
1974~77: the 2235, 2250/B, 2275,
1977~79: the 2238/B, 2265/B, 2285/B.

The earliest grouping were produced in the highest volume, and generally have the biggest following; but, being older, will need a refurb, especially the electrolytic capacitors, sooner than the others... and will likely sound accordingly.
The newest grouping will more likely have a few 'good' years left before a refurb is needed.
How many hours any used receiver has been player, and at what volume is a total wild card, as with it's likely need for a restoration.
Rest assured, to sound their best, ALL of the above receivers will need a full restoration by a skilled AND motivated tech, using BEST QUALITY AUDIO GRADE COMPONENTS to sound their best.
... this will NOT be the condition of any receivers you are likely to be able to audition.
So what is one to do...
First give some thought to the size of the listening rooms for your receiver over the next 20 or more years, what speakers you may want to use in your system and what music you want to listen to, and at what volumes.
This will help you to decide between a 2230, 2245 or 2270 for example, or a receiver from the newer groupings. How much POWER being the primary question.
Here's a good LINK to Marantz Legendary Audio Classics:
http://www.classic-audio.com/marantz/2245.html
Spend some time there.
Consider that the older grouping will need a refurb a little sooner.
Some prefer the 'busy' look of the newer groupings with all the extra buttons knobs and often a Balance slider.
To my ear, the newer 2 groups are 'brighter' sounding, especially in the upper-midrange. Not an improvement to my ear; but many would disagree.
In the end, they are all fine receivers that will sound between very Good ~ Excellent, depending on the QUALITY of the refurb... something you should plan for. Whether you refurb sooner or later, and who you chose to do the work will have a far greater influence on the sound than which receiver you eventually chose.
A last word of advice... for me, a little MORE POWER is always the better choice. You will be able to move your system to a bigger room, or upgrade your speakers without then, also having to upgrade your power amp, and having to start from scratch, designing a whole new system.
To the POWER point:
Marantz rated their specs, especially POWER, more conservatively in the early 70s, especially compared to the late 70s.
For example:
The 2245, 2250 and 2265 all make about the same power;
same with the 2270, 2275 and 2285.
The 'POWER WARS' (as advertised) were on in full force by the late 70s.
...How does that quote go?
"Lies, damned lies and statistics"... and receiver SPECS...:D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom