MWalt
Super Member
Have any of you guys here ever heard about the break in trick of applying a 9v transistor radio type battery to ICs. The fellow who told me about at a fest a few years back said that you want the negative terminal on the end that will plug into the amp, and the positive on the end that will plug into the device (CDP or whatever). Current flows from negative to positive, so this will break them in directionally as well, even though we are dealing with AC voltage. He also said it takes just a second, no matter what the manufacturer recomends. I never tried it, as I use a Cardis sweep LP for most burn in jobs. It just came to mind when I read the 400 hour deal. I wonder what is actually happening to the wire that takes so long, do they say? I think if I were to try the above mentioned "trick" I'd first try it on some cheap cables and use a 1.5 volt battery, or even a variac set for 1 or 2 volts to get AC.:scratch2: I think I might design a cable burner inner. I used to have a lot of trouble with belts stretching when I did residential AC and heating. I'd put on a new belt, and in 30 days it would be too loose. I made myself a belt stretcher with a motor, a couple pulleys, and a fairly heavy spring. The problem was eliminated, as were the call backs.:thmbsp:
Now that's a cool trick. I'll have to remember that one.
I just bought a pair of SP3 speaker cables, MA3 interconnect and PH3 phono cables. They should be shipping soon. I'm pretty excited as these are my first upper level cables.
If I recall, the MA-3's are the sweet spot in the IC lineup. Let us know how they sound.
*EDIT* Almost immediately after I wrote this post i ordered two pair of Morrow Audio MA-3 IC's. Also Jay, I asked about the 1.5v battery trick and he discounted the idea by claiming that the cables needed sine waves to properly break in. He gave me a bunch of reasons so I hope I got that correct.
Last edited: