• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Music Lover , Audiophile or Both ?

Well that doesn't work. My equipment spending outweighs my media costs because FM doesn't cost a thing. When you've got a dozen or so good stations there's not much need for spending money except for the equipment to listen to it.
It truly must be nice. It seems every other station here plays "pop-country" nonsense. We have a couple of "oldies" stations for country music, but I have a hard time defining Tim McGraw as an oldie. It's sad to say, but there's an "easy" station that plays more classic country than any of the country stations put together.
 
No - phile means lover - philosophy is the lover of wisdom. Phile DOES NOT have negative connotations, but people who don't understand think it does.
:confused:. Words mean what you want them to mean, not what some "dictionary" says they do.
:music:
 
Words are not negative or positive - it is how we react and react to the words that is negative. Just because one word with that suffix has a negative connotation they all do?

The dictionary is the proper definition and use of words. I try to use them that way.

I agree. You can't simply declare that you don't like the commonly (by even the minimally educated) accepted dictionary definition and decide a word means something that you decide it does.

The suffix "phile" has been around for a while and the definition is commonly agreed upon.
 
I don´t consider myself an audiophile. I love music, and it needs to be reproduced relatively accurately.

Music on my system moves me to tears, but I also thoroughly enjoy music just on my phone with €30 earbuds.

I have heard a lot of "systems", or bluetooth speakers that just sound terrible, really unlistenable. I mean, really how can you enjoy music with something like that?
 
I would like to be an audiophile but I have 60 year old ears! Guess that relegates me to simple music lover. I do however like having a system that sounds nice, is easy to use and makes me happy. I am sure my system would be the envy of some and the scorn of others.
 
I think the suffix -phile generally has negative connotations. Think pedophile. An oenophile is a wine snob; ergo, an audiophile is a high fidelity snob.
I commend your courage to make the pedo comparison...I think its unfortunately the most referenced of the philes these days and it does seem to come to mind when using the word audiophile.
 
I love the way certain components sound but I am much more of a music lover than an audiophile.
16508357_1392805284116188_2541345207603820886_n.jpg
 
Recently I read a statement on another site : A music lover listens to music on their system . An Audiophile
listens to their system through their music . Made me think about my listening habits . Lately I've been using an assortment of Digital Audio Players , IEM'S and Headphones . I realize that for me , the music will always come first . How about you ? Music Lover , Audiophile or Both ?
As this thread shows, there are different ways of understanding the term audiophile. In my experience, that is, at the shops and hifi clubs I've hung out at over the years, an audiophile is a music lover who goes to the expense of using high-end equipment to reproduce the music. My first foray into separate components was in the 1970's with brands like BIC, Pioneer, and EPI--not audiophile-grade equipment, but very enjoyable, nonetheless. In the 1980's, I upgraded to components from Linn and Naim, which some would consider high-end gear. About a decade ago, I went a different direction with components from Well Tempered, Audio by Van Alstine, and Vandersteen, also gear considered audiophile-worthy by some. Currently, I'm getting all the musical pleasure I crave with a more humble Rega RP3, the same Audio by Van Alstine amplification, and low-end Bose speakers--not an audiophile system in the sense I've understood it, but very enjoyable nonetheless. Whatever the make-up of the system, love of music has been the reason for having any kind of sound system at all.
 
My name is Aldo Cella and I'm no slave to fashion or the misuse/misunderstanding of the language.:biggrin:

The suffix "phile" means lover of, nothing more nothing less.
 
Depending on the selection my first choice might emphasize the quality of the performance with equal emphasis on capturing the sound of the performance hall. Other selections might be critiqued by mic placement, the mix, or musician ship. I don't know what that makes me. I was listening to a terrible recording of the Marine band today on You Tube where Sousa compositions were discussed and how the Marine Band interpreted them. But I got a thrill out of the presentation.
 
I love the music, especially live music. Therefore, I record the music.
Because I love the music, and the experience, I want to replicate it to the best of my abilities. This means scads of concerts attended, untold hours of critical listening, assessing, trying again; followed by another attempt, extreme critical listening, assessing, trying again.... over decades.
Its a cycle of my front end (recording rig), feeding my back end (playback rig), and critical listening to minute adjustments. I have some nicely assembled pieces in both my front and back end, and, they compliment the music well.
The impetus is the music, and a deep love for it. The result is appreciated by a few different playback rigs. Without either end, I'd listen to a lot less msuic.

I proudly call myself an audiophile.
 
Back
Top Bottom