My new Standard Bearer: The Sansui 5000X

M Jarve

Audio Geek and NGE Freak
You can’t really know how much it pains me to write what I am about to, so I’ll just out with it: The King is Dead! Long Live the King! That is to say I have finally found a receiver so extremely musical that it has out-shined the h/k 430. This receiver is none other than the Sansui 5000X.

A week back or so in the D&S forum there was a thread about a 5000X for a fair price in Connecticut, and it turned out that the reluctant seller was also a member of AK. I inquired as to whether Rod would mind selling out of state and we struck a deal. The unit arrived today in impeccable shape.

When I first plugged it in and turned it on, the lights seemed a little dim. When I started to play music, it was playing fine, but it did not seem to have the gusto that my 5000A had (my 5000A has a blown channel, but the other plays fine). Since Rod was thoughtful enough to include the service manual, I cracked her open (both the receiver and the manual) and started to make adjustments. I also noted, curiously, that a sticker on the side indicated 220V operation. When I removed the 5000X from the handsome wood cabinet I just about started to laugh. It was set for 220V operation! :saywhat: For probably 30+ years it had been running at effectively ½ it’s capability! I quickly reset it for 117V (closest to current 120V) and adjusted the idling current.

I reconnected it to the CDP and speakers and let it rip. Lights were definite brighter, but the sound? Totally different receiver. It went from demure and timid to brawny and very confident. FM reception also improved by orders of magnitude. I started off with the first track from Alicia Key’s Songs in A minor, and the piano just jumped right out from the speakers and onto the floor. I moved on to “Talking Bout my Baby” from Fatboy Slim’s Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars, where a (usually) barely audible infra-sonic beat sounds off in rhythm in the left-speaker- the beat was not only audible, but shook the entire house. Then it was of to Jazz Land with Alice Babs and Yoko Kanno where the 5000X demonstrated an almost unbelievable ability to express limitless dynamics. Overall sound is very neutral, but smooth, with a nice slight under-dampening in the bass region that I love in capacitor coupled amps. Not enough to make it sound anywhere near muddy, just a little more meat when compared to a DC amp.

The 5000X is RMS rated for 60 wpc into 8-ohms (160-wpc IHF into 8-ohms), making it a very powerful receiver for the time (’71-72). One of the attributes that is most impressive is its almost limitless power. It begs you to try and find the limit and it provides more power than I would ever use on a routine basis. Its load tolerance is very good as well, easily powering both a pair of AR 28BX’s and Koss C/M 1020’s at the same time.

Looking at the competition, the 5000X (and 5000A) is a great value. Comparable Marantz units (2270) routinely fetch 3-4 times the average price of a 5000 series, with Pioneer SX-939’s more competitively priced -the 5000X certainly holds its own against them.

A caveat: the 5000, 5000A, and early 5000X’s were prone to catastrophic driver-board failure. The 3.3uFd capacitor near the bias-pot could leak causing it to explode, and certain other elements would cause a greater current draw than the components could handle. Driver boards numbered F-1040 or F-1040-1 are affected; units sent in for factory service up to 1986 would have the boards replaced with a F-6013 version that corrected these problems- though, historically to the degradation of the sound. Generally, if it has not gone bad after 35 years, it probably will not, though it may be a good idea to replace the 3.3uFd cap anyway.

The h/k 430 is a worthy receiver and perhaps one of the best in the 30-wpc or less bracket, but the 5000X filled in the missing blanks and is definitely one of the best mid-power receivers I have come across yet. Makes me want to finish the 5000A just to see how it would compare.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Having too many recievers, I recently sold my 5000x but I just wanted to congratulate you on getting one. The 5000x is a very "musical" sounding reciever and fared well with all genres. I found it to be very comparable to the SS Macs of that vintage and if you do a cosmetic comparison, they favor each other. That's one I know I'll regret selling. BTW, there's a convenient output control on the back of the unit that allows some tweaking that can come in very handy dependent on your listening needs. Great reciever!
 
Mike,

I was wondering if you thought that having you 5000x run at 220V for the past 30 years has saved it from the problems you've described, and maybe saved it's best (or original) sonic presentation for you? The different components not driven hard but just enough to work. As my knowledge is limited, it may be that the reverse is true and being set at 220V was, potentially more harmful. :scratch2:

Just an thought I had. Nice pickup and I hope you do not have any of the problems you spoke of, just good tunes

Jason
 
I picked up a 5000X at a local thrift back in January for $25.00, and then spent another $25.00 in new capacitors, and man does it sound great! It beat out a Pioneer SX-780 and a Yamaha CR-620 without even breaking a sweat. :D However it met its match with my Concept 11.0, but only slightly. I wouldn't even think of getting rid of mine, but did get rid of the Pioneer and that Yamaha is taking up space... :scratch2:
 
Urizen said:
I would love to see a nudie of that one...please? :D
I think that can be arranged, as well as a comparison shot with the 5000A.

mhardy6647 said:
Mike, your comments beg the question: how does the 5000X compare to the 5000A?
I need to get some new output transistors for the 5000A, though one channel does work. I suppose I could play a mono program into both and make a pretty fair comparison.

whyaskit said:
Mike,

I was wondering if you thought that having you 5000x run at 220V for the past 30 years has saved it from the problems you've described, and maybe saved it's best (or original) sonic presentation for you? The different components not driven hard but just enough to work. As my knowledge is limited, it may be that the reverse is true and being set at 220V was, potentially more harmful.

Just an thought I had. Nice pickup and I hope you do not have any of the problems you spoke of, just good tunes

Jason
I don't think it would have, seeing as how the problems were current related and not voltage related. I have little doubt that having the unit run in 220 Volt mode for so many years probably did affect it. For one, the capacitors were likely not fully utilized during that time. It probably clipped more easily as well (there was noticeable low-order harmonic distortion akin to an over-driven tube amp before I switched it). My unit does have the F-1040-1 driver boards, but as long as I keep it well maintained and calibrated, I do not imagine I will have any problems with it.

On the positive side, however, the active components (transistors, etc.) may have been saved some years by the lower operating voltage.

Damage said:
You sure it's not the added power that makes it sound better?
At the same levels (levels my 430 has always been comfortable with), the 5000X has more body and richer texture that I can really appreciate. The 430, by comparison, is a little more dry sounding, though perhaps more accurate. The 5000X has a very tube-like sound that reminds me more of a h/k 820 than anything else. About as close as you can get without filament heaters. It is very likely that over the years my tastes have begun to lean more towards (or back towards, as it is) tube sound. There are some things, however, that the 430 does better hands down. Imaging for one. The soundstage is definitely kept to the confines of the speakers with the 5000X, where as it does expand quite a bit with the 430.
 
Great post, Mike. The Sansui must be pretty nice. I remember my SX-828, a bit newer from 72-74, and have a fond spot in my heart for the guy.
Had some friends with the same era Sansui receivers, and I know I really enjoyed myself when we hung out and listened to stereo and other stuff.
 
Hey! I also had a revelation with my Sony STR-7055. Handily beat out my Pioneer and Kenwood receivers, simply being more musical. Better sounding in almost every way. Definitely a warmer sound, yet very detailed and dynamic. Amazingly, even a better soundstage with the Sony - something I didn't think was possible with electronics. I thought that was left to the speakers. Not true. There wasn't a pair of speakers that didn't sound better on my Sony.

Can't talk to the Sansui 5000x. My dad gave away his 5000a about 3 years ago :tears: . Would anyone (Mike) care to make a comparison to the older Sony's?
 
Guess you need one of these, Mike!
hk930-1.jpg

hk930-3.jpg
 
I saw that. Pretty neat. No tubes for me quite yet. I'd love to find a "plug-and-play" tube amp that I don't need to futz with, and that will not burn-down the living room... again. Unfortunately, such an amp in the 20-40 wpc range is difficult to be had under $1K. I have a couple of MC-240's, and the one that was (mostly) working did not really impress me that much, but it needed new caps and tubes so I never really gave it a fair chance. The other one started smoking the moment I turned it on, and I have not touched it since.

Still, after hearing Ron's Pilot amps, I felt bitten by the bug. But, for the time being, CC solid-state amps are about as close as I will get.
 
I have never heard a 5000X Mike. One of the next times your going to be down this way and have some time, bring it with you. Im sure we could find something around here to hook up to it.

Maybe even give my 430 a onsite attitude adjustment :yes:

RC
 
Have to agree with Mike. My 5000X is my favorite. There are more powerful, more expensive and not many as good looking (IMO). Clean, classy, great features and beautiful sound. I was amazed at the warm, detailed sound. Lucked into mine when neighbor was moving. Enjoy Mikes descriptive and knowledgable review's.
 
Pictures!

Here are some pics, along with one with my new Koss CM/1020 speakers... With the internal pics, try to guess which is which.

Sorry that the quality is not very good. It's the MS Photo Editor program. I need to re-install Photoshop something fierce.
 

Attachments

  • ks_f_m.jpg
    ks_f_m.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 233
  • 5000_f_m.jpg
    5000_f_m.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 239
  • 5000a_f_m.jpg
    5000a_f_m.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 168
  • 5000a_t_m.jpg
    5000a_t_m.jpg
    53.6 KB · Views: 143
  • 5000a_sd_m.jpg
    5000a_sd_m.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 140
  • 5000a_bk_m.jpg
    5000a_bk_m.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 144
  • 5000a_bk_dt_m.jpg
    5000a_bk_dt_m.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 156
  • 5000a_int_t_m.jpg
    5000a_int_t_m.jpg
    67.8 KB · Views: 231
  • 5000x_f_m.jpg
    5000x_f_m.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 166
  • 5000x_t_m.jpg
    5000x_t_m.jpg
    54.7 KB · Views: 152
  • 5000x_iso_m.jpg
    5000x_iso_m.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 169
  • 5000x_sd_m.jpg
    5000x_sd_m.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 139
  • 5000x_bk_m.jpg
    5000x_bk_m.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 156
  • 5000x_bk_dt_m.jpg
    5000x_bk_dt_m.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 154
  • 5000x_int_t_m.jpg
    5000x_int_t_m.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 265
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom