PCB is marked
NAD3020E
NAD3020PE
5553125800 "w-08"
TATUNG TT-294-v0
Looking at this doco it seems to be labelled W-00 and there are some labelling differences on the fuse section.
I now realise that they are a little sloppy in the manufacture - see attached.
The fuses are on a little board and there are two pairs of fuses and each has an associated cap.
The diagram shows f503/504 and C503 wheream I got confused for a couple of hours cos I couldn't locate the fuses and cap
my amp uses which are f501/502 and C502. I then noticed them on the NAD3020PE circuite diagram which uses all 4 fuses and caps.
But the 3020E only uses half the fuse board and the assemblers obiously used the other half that isn't on the E schematic at all.
Hey ho.
! The two fuses F503/504 (or alt f501/502) are blown.
I didn't notice if these were blown before I started work as I didn't even pay attention to that little board until I'd inspected the back of the main one (which looks ok).
But then I noticed that a cap C502 (see below) was lifted, and so forgot to check the fuses before investigating c502.
So I don't know it those fuses were blown by me or the underlying fault.
Also C502 which bridges the output of those two fuses (coincidentally ?) wasn't soldered properly.
One leg was basically floating, possibly in contact intermittently, so I attached that properly.
However, I need to get two fuses to test more.
Additionally C502 measures as 10nF out of circuit which seems tiny but it has a high resistance so isn't a short. The schematic indicated 0.1 but no units.
UPDATE: Found Schematic for 3020i and it shows this as 10nf
https://akdatabase.org/AKview/albums/userpics/10007/NAD 3020i 3225PE Service Manual.pdf
Also - the discrete bridge rectifier diodes are intact.
--
The voltage across the dead fuses is 44v AC.
Neither of the rail coming out of the discrete rectifier are shorted to ground.
Both big caps read about 4800uf
--
All 4 power transistors still look like transistors, diodes drops where there should be diode drops.
? However, correct me if I'm wrong but I can't test these in circuit using the opposite multimeter probes - where out of circuit these should read open.
If I try this on my multimeter then on the npn the voltage creeps up to 2v then my meter reads OL.
Maybe its pointless?? let me know.
--
npn Q411 ok
2SD669, 2SD669ASilicon NPN EpitaxialApplicationLow frequency power amplifier complementary pair with 2SB649/AOutline1. Emitter2. Collector3. BaseTO-126 MOD1 Datasheet search, datasheets, Datasheet search site for Electronic Components and Semiconductors, integrated circuits, diodes, triacs and...
www.alldatasheet.com
pnp Q413 ok
2SB649, 2SB649ASilicon PNP EpitaxialApplicationLow frequency power amplifier complementary pair with 2SD669/AOutline1. Emitter2. Collector3. BaseTO-126 MOD1 Datasheet search, datasheets, Datasheet search site for Electronic Components and Semiconductors, integrated circuits, diodes, triacs and...
www.alldatasheet.com
npn q412 ok
pnp q414 ok
---
bd139 pnp ...
pnp q410 B/C is a 0.6v but B/E is 0.18v (116ohm) DEAD MAYBE NOT?
pnp q409 B/C is 0.6v but B/E is 0.18v (116ohm) DEAD MAYBE NOT?
BUT there are 2 resistors from B to E, a 100 (r441) and a 39 (r445) so OK ????
At least there is no short ?!
---
D406/406 ok
---
bd139 pnp ...
Q407 ok
q408 ok
---
pnp bc556B
BC556 PNP Transistor
q405 0.7v ok
q406 0.7v ok
====
npn bc550c base in middle
q401 0.7v ok
q402 0.7v ok
pnp bc556b
q403 0.7v ok
q404 0.7v ok
----
d401/401 ok
d403/404 ok
----
d801 ok
d803 ok
d802 ok
d804 ok
d805 ok
d806 ok
----
q5XX transistors all ok
----
q301 ok
q302 ok
q303 ??? is this labelled wrong in the schematic?? B and E seem transposed on the little image on schematic vs my measurements and datasheets
q304 ok ?