that's like saying bottom of the line Lamborghini!Pretty much the bottom of the line Hallicrafters radio.
that's like saying bottom of the line Lamborghini!Pretty much the bottom of the line Hallicrafters radio.
i am not worthy!Rated at 60 watts, you can listen and test, but if you like what you hear then you can seek more power.
that's like saying bottom of the line Lamborghini!
so what, its still cool, and old!No.
Say Collins, or Racal and you'd be closer, but Hallicrafters? No way!
Hallicrafters was a Ford if anything, I've had dozens of them as a Ham over the years, still have an SX17, a SX100, and an R274, so, yeah, the S-38 is a bottom of the line receiver, a very simple variation of the All American Five radio with bandswitching...it was a cheap radio...period.
The later versions of the 901 can handle gobs of power because they do not have a fragile thin-wired tweeter voice coil. They have nice thick wire wound on high power handling capacity 4" drivers. So they can handle being plugged into the wall, getting 1200 watts of pure 60 Hz audio power. Not that I would want to hear that. Additionally the input power is divided 9 ways so each driver doesn't see much power in typical applications.My 901 owner’s manual stipulated that there was NO power handling limit for the 901s, in “non-commercial applications”.
Obviously he knows more then the rest of us and does not need our help, the 901's are going to sound like **** with anything he has especially the joke the S-38, he doesnt even know yet if the surrounds are shot. What a mess this thread has turned out to be, makes a guy not want to help anymore.
This is true. Heck I know when I get a new toy I want to play with it, I have been known to take a day off work just to listen to a new amp speakers ETC and I was a workaholic typically I would work over 100 hours a week.I hear you. (Shaking head.) My thinking is…that the good thing about threads here on AK (despite the unproven longevity of digital content), is that, even if they fall on deaf ears today, they may help others in the future.



Some are now "collectibles" since ending production. My brother bought 901s in Germany, 1980s, still have them and they play like yesterday 

I normally use the lead which has the mfg/model printed on it as the "black" lead. But you'll need to follow it to it's source to determine the true polarity.Speaker wires not labeled, or color coded. One has mfg I’d on it.
thx. sucks i now have to unbold the tulips; or can i just do a quick test? 50/50 chance.I normally use the lead which has the mfg/model printed on it as the "black" lead. But you'll need to follow it to it's source to determine the true polarity.
thx for that input. the thread has taken a slightly dark turn with some important contributors pushing for the finish line. as much as i appreciate all suggestions and comments, i don't necessarily have a set up that is ideal for these speakers right now. i'm not running out to buy a $500 200 watt used amp. working with what i have. its as much the journey as the destination. just finding the time to acquire these was an effort.I've used a Pioneer SX-939 and a Yamaha AX-630 to drive my 901's. They were both 70-80 watts. The speakers sounded fine. This thread has taken off somewhat, but I'm pleased to see that the 901's are getting some love.
You gotta guess that the original install of the wires was done the same on both. If so, it does not matter whether you use the words or the plain as the + or - but do them both the same. Should be right if the original connection was done correctly.thx. sucks i now have to unbold the tulips; or can i just do a quick test? 50/50 chance.
Yes, they will.Sounds like they would rock the house.