I agree. He set the hook and walked away.Tell me more about this stylus, please.
I agree. He set the hook and walked away.Tell me more about this stylus, please.
hi!Tell me more about this stylus, please.
I agree. He set the hook and walked away.
Oops, I meant bigbopper's stylus (D5000). Nice!
hi!
Is a normal 625e without the plastic chunk.
I removed to improve the stylus talk test. My theory was correct. The stylus vibrate and the vibration was transmited to the plastic chunk that is hollow and hard.- Vibration love hard surface!! The plactic is attached to the body and so on. Removing the plastick the talk decreased a lot, because doesnt have the resonsnce box anymore. I was thinking to add bee wax inside the hollow cavities inside the chunk, but add weight that I dont need. Still a fair option to do that, probably in my next stylus.
The small tab you see, i made it to keep the gap between the stylus and the body and adjust the azimuth.
Andre.
I've experienced both, but not for a long time--not since factory fresh, original styli were still being made. The XSV-3000 produced some of the best sound I've heard in a modest stereo; a friend had one in his Thorens TD147, and it produced extremely fine sound through his original NAD 3020 amplifier and Klipsch Heresy speakers. I liked the XV-15 625E in my Thorens TD146, finding that my TD146 really couldn't take advantage of or get my money's worth out of more expensive cartridges. I later used a Stanton 981 (similar to the Pickering XSV line) in a Linn LP12, but reverted to a 681EEE Mk III when they stopped producing styli for the 981. When the 681's were also discontinued, I moved to Shure; now that Shure is gone, I'm using Sumiko.I was use to a faster answer and this subject should raise some replies for I'm sure lots of you have experienced one or the other cardridge ...
![]()
Dont discard the idea that you probably have good ears..
AG.
That is a long journey under lots of different brands ! I don't have that experience yet ... I only have two TTs, both Sansui, one being a SR-2050C that spins with a Nagaoka MP110 (the most expensive cartrige I ever bought and according to my ears, worth every cent spent) and the other, a recently purchased SR-4050C dressed with it's original cartrige that gives a really poor sound !I've experienced both, but not for a long time--not since factory fresh, original styli were still being made. The XSV-3000 produced some of the best sound I've heard in a modest stereo; a friend had one in his Thorens TD147, and it produced extremely fine sound through his original NAD 3020 amplifier and Klipsch Heresy speakers. I liked the XV-15 625E in my Thorens TD146, finding that my TD146 really couldn't take advantage of or get my money's worth out of more expensive cartridges. I later used a Stanton 981 (similar to the Pickering XSV line) in a Linn LP12, but reverted to a 681EEE Mk III when they stopped producing styli for the 981. When the 681's were also discontinued, I moved to Shure; now that Shure is gone, I'm using Sumiko.
The xv-15 w/ 350 stylus is ideal. 400 will work too if you want an elliptical stylus.
NOS are hard to find at good prices, but you should be able to find aftermarket.
The xsv-3000 takes higher compliance styli (that usually means lower VTF). It may not match your tonearm as well.
In between all the different expenses with equipment, if you don't squeeze the budget, you got none left to by LP's and then ... what's the point in having the best equipment with plenty various items to compare if you have nothing to listen on ?Without knowing your financial situation I will naively recommend to buy both and let your ears decide which one you prefer. In any case, good luck.![]()





The Stanton closest to the XV-15 625E would probably be the 680EE, which I believe was later called the 680 HiFi. The 681 models were part of Stanton's "calibration standard," which were individually tested at the factory and the test results included in the box the cartridge came in. Neither the 625E nor the 680EE included test results. The 681EEE models also tended to be specified as having slightly higher compliance (e.g., 25 cu as opposed to the 17 or 18 cu of the 625E and 680EE).. . . The cardrige meant to be on this turntable is an IM type ... But I guess setting an MM type will do ?? I do not have lots of knowledge in the field of cartriges and don't know if either Stanton of Pickering ever made any IM types... Maybe you can help me on this point ?
Jrtrent ?... what return do you have to share wrt the Stanton 681 vs the XV-15 625E ??
I made it using a laser cutter. Glad to send you one. I am not home until next week.Sweet! If you don't mind sharing, how did you make the little tab? I have a couple spare aftermarket stylus I'd love to try this on.
Trying.Hearing those issues, means your ears for me are worthy and beyond reproach. Meaning you have a trained ear.
Thanks Nat for picking this up!What I can add is that the arm on your table is the original arm, and that you have the lateral weight misadjusted - it should be vertical not horizontal (and it actually looks tilted up). How much that matters is arguable, but in its correct orientation it will lower the center of mass a bit, which is probably helpful.
All the manuals are in the library at Vinyl Engine.



)