To me, Koa is even brighter than Mahogany. My Ukes are made of Koa.
They were measuring the elastic modulus and Q of various materials and doing it scientifically. Not research that I would dismiss as having "no correlation". Of course a box will behave differently to a plank - that isn't in dispute - but it doesn't negate the usefulness of the research. I'm sure the people conducting the research weren't idiots.Testing a thin strip of wood had no correlation to a thick pieces of wood joined on all four edges. They tested just that, strips off wood by themselves big deal. Now double/tripple the thickness and build a box with the wood connected tightly at all the intersecting edges with enclosures made of different materials put same driver in it playing the same for all the differnt enclosures and "then" try to figure out if it has a significant impact on anything you can actually hear; Totally different things.
Sure you can test a strip of 1 inch by 1/8 strip of metal and get x reading but weld a cube out of it and its characteristics will be totally different. . Apples to oranges in what one is testing.
Not saying they are not intelligent but the test would only be useful for someone using that strip of wood in that size and that thickness with that moisture content ect et. Attach it to something, change the thickness and width and everything changes. Just hold the free edges of the piece of wood during testing everything changes. Only useful for what it was.
"The test" was to measure the basic properties of a range of materials for comparison, not to measure the properties of any particular strip of material. Furthermore, the research goes on to test complete loudspeaker enclosures for sound transmission through the walls of the enclosure and study the effects of various types of damping material.Not saying they are not intelligent but the test would only be useful for someone using that strip of wood in that size and that thickness with that moisture content ect et. Attach it to something, change the thickness and width and everything changes. Just hold the free edges of the piece of wood during testing everything changes. Only useful for what it was.
Those who have said that mahogany is better used elsewhere convinced me.
I recently came into a quantity of beautiful 1 1/4" thick mahogany boards. I'll be building a system for my office soon, a 3 way with a 10" woofer. The woofer will be crossed over fairly low. The midrange and tweeter will be in a separate enclosure. I'm mulling over making the woofer enclosure out of the mahogany instead of the usual heavily braced MDF. My thinking is that the cabinet resonance that speaker designers try to get rid of by using inert materials only affects the upper bass / midrange frequencies. Is this flawed thinking?
When I built my DIY subs, a friend who helped me, worked as a summer intern at JBL. He said 3/4-inch MDF was the way to go, for overall strength, lack of bass tonal signature, and low inherit resonance frequency. Built correctly, it needed the least amount of internal bracing --- which he said was good for good bass response. To reduce standing and internal interference waves. And keep internal volume as high as possible. If I remember correctly. It's been a long, long time.
I hand-wound the 20mH chokes with 100mfd caps = about 115Hz crossover (6dB/octave). I used JBL 136A 15-inch speakers --- which match those in the L300, at the time.

