Day 3 with my new Sony TA1150 vintage play toy. WOW. I an duly impressed.
I have a handful of 70's vintage pieces, Sony TA2650,Sherwood 9400, Pioneer SA7700, Sansui 5050, Sanyo Plus 55, all of which get play time pushing my Forte I, TW 1A or B&W 610 speakers.
While each exhibits its own unique flavor, they all have that telltale sweet 70's vintage hi-fi quality, to a greater and lesser degree, that is so alluring. Yeah, yeah, I know, I cannot really determine what the true sound is without a full recap and whatnot to fully hear the units as the engineers intended...But I think you all know the sound to which I refer.
Enter the Sony TA1150, an altogether differant animal from other vintage i have heard. Bought off the 'bay supposedly 100% functional; arrived with a dead left channel and interior dust as thick as cake frosting (This is the 3rd straight 'bay buy not as described for me). Deoxit to the rescue once again. Gave it the D'bath and removed a great deal of the dust.
My O' my, this thing is more akin to a modern day finicky audiophile grade amplifier then any other vintage I've encountered. As I've read about here at the AK, I can see why it is thought that early Sony was voiced to compete with McIntosh. I own an MC2205.
I'd say the 1150 shares an emphasis of the midrange and a lack of concern with soundstage that I think marks part of the signature of the 2205. The 1150 has a very neutral, clean, lean and detailed sound that nobody would describe as having note of vintage warmth. Not so much detail as to be etchy, but I'm hearing into the recording further then I'm used to With the Sony, Forte/TW1A set up. My critical listening is done on a Spectra 33/Bedini 150 mkIi combo so I have a good idea what's in these recordings.
This little 35w bugger is picky about recordings. My recently acquired kyocera R851 loves everything I throw at it. Great soundstage. Nice inner detail. Incredible low end. Most people would much prefer its commanding attitude. The Sony is far more snooty. I find myself tweaking every recording: the Kyocers not so much.
Additionally, this baby is just loving the vinyl. Nice balance of frequencies. VG detail. The records sound differant. Somehow they seem more confident. It has really taken to my at440mla w/120e stylus. Of course I'm still basking in the newness of it all. Some would say its just a crush but I think I may be in love.
Any of you all have a similar experience with early Sony? I dig my 2650. It's got that HiFi thing in spades yet is of a very differant nature. Could anyone enlighten me as to what is going on engineering wise with the 1150 that the 2650 or the other same era pieces I mentioned just don't seem to have?
Thanks
I have a handful of 70's vintage pieces, Sony TA2650,Sherwood 9400, Pioneer SA7700, Sansui 5050, Sanyo Plus 55, all of which get play time pushing my Forte I, TW 1A or B&W 610 speakers.
While each exhibits its own unique flavor, they all have that telltale sweet 70's vintage hi-fi quality, to a greater and lesser degree, that is so alluring. Yeah, yeah, I know, I cannot really determine what the true sound is without a full recap and whatnot to fully hear the units as the engineers intended...But I think you all know the sound to which I refer.
Enter the Sony TA1150, an altogether differant animal from other vintage i have heard. Bought off the 'bay supposedly 100% functional; arrived with a dead left channel and interior dust as thick as cake frosting (This is the 3rd straight 'bay buy not as described for me). Deoxit to the rescue once again. Gave it the D'bath and removed a great deal of the dust.
My O' my, this thing is more akin to a modern day finicky audiophile grade amplifier then any other vintage I've encountered. As I've read about here at the AK, I can see why it is thought that early Sony was voiced to compete with McIntosh. I own an MC2205.
I'd say the 1150 shares an emphasis of the midrange and a lack of concern with soundstage that I think marks part of the signature of the 2205. The 1150 has a very neutral, clean, lean and detailed sound that nobody would describe as having note of vintage warmth. Not so much detail as to be etchy, but I'm hearing into the recording further then I'm used to With the Sony, Forte/TW1A set up. My critical listening is done on a Spectra 33/Bedini 150 mkIi combo so I have a good idea what's in these recordings.
This little 35w bugger is picky about recordings. My recently acquired kyocera R851 loves everything I throw at it. Great soundstage. Nice inner detail. Incredible low end. Most people would much prefer its commanding attitude. The Sony is far more snooty. I find myself tweaking every recording: the Kyocers not so much.
Additionally, this baby is just loving the vinyl. Nice balance of frequencies. VG detail. The records sound differant. Somehow they seem more confident. It has really taken to my at440mla w/120e stylus. Of course I'm still basking in the newness of it all. Some would say its just a crush but I think I may be in love.
Any of you all have a similar experience with early Sony? I dig my 2650. It's got that HiFi thing in spades yet is of a very differant nature. Could anyone enlighten me as to what is going on engineering wise with the 1150 that the 2650 or the other same era pieces I mentioned just don't seem to have?
Thanks
